ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

American Half Cent copper coins

Updated on December 8, 2018
Pcunix profile image

I was born in 1948 and spent most of my career as a self employed computer trouble shooter for Unix systems.


United States Half Cents were minted from 1793 to 1857.

The initial design was very simple: a head of liberty on the obverse with the word "Liberty" and the date. The reverse has a laurel wreath of leaves and berries tied with a bow, the words "United States of America" , "Half Cent" and "1/200". The edge has an incuse "TWO HUNDRED FOR A DOLLAR" with two leaves.

The design of 1794 was similar, but Liberty now faced right and was larger. This design continued until 1800, when the depiction of Liberty was again changed. In 1809, the so-called "Classic Head" design appeared - Liberty again faces left and has gained weight!

The "Braided Hair" design appeared in 1840 and continued until the end of the series in 1857.

This 1855 Half Cent is one of the very few pieces I kept when I sold off the coin collection I had begun when I was a young boy. I was always very interested in early American copper coinage, both large cents and the smaller half cent.

Only 56,500 of these half cents were produced by the U.S. Mint in 1855. Indeed, less than 8 million of this denomination were minted in all the years of their production. Never popular, the demand for these coins was highest in the early 1800's; by the 1850's very few were being made.


"Classic Head" Design
"Classic Head" Design | Source
"Classic Head" Design
"Classic Head" Design | Source


Due to difficulties obtaining copper and lack of demand, no half cents were minted in 1812 and mintage did not resume until 1825. What copper was available was used for Large Cents, indicating that the half cent was less popular even then. The mint often had large quantities in its vaults due to the lack of demand.

By the way, these coins were 100% copper. Today's one cent pieces are zinc with a copper coating.

You might think that the low demand was because of the low face value, but the purchasing power of a half cent in 1855 was roughly equivalent to a dime today (2010). An unskilled workman earned about seven cents an hour then (see MeasuringWorth.com ), so this was not an insignificant amount of money. It may have been that there were simply enough of these coins already in circulation. However, then as now, inflation was steadily eroding the purchasing power of these small coins, and their size (just slightly smaller than today's quarter in diameter, but much thicker and therefore weighing almost as much) made them unpopular. In several years, they were produced only for collectors, with none going to general circulation.


This is the smallest denomination ever officially minted by the United States. There was never coinage of smaller value. The Coinage Act of 1792 referenced "milles" as one tenth of a cent (approximately equivalent to three cents now), but no coins of that value were ever authorized or made.

(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinage_Act_(1792))

That the money of account of the United States shall be expressed in dollars or units, dismes or tenths, cents or hundredths, and milles or thousandths, a disme being the tenth part of a dollar, a cent the hundredth part of a dollar, a mille the thousandth part of a dollar, and that all accounts in the public offices and all proceedings in the courts of the United States shall be kept and had in conformity to this regulation.[3]

So why were these coins made? There was a popular economic theory that smaller coin values would bring lower prices, which would help the poor. The poor apparently didn't agree.

Because of their relative scarcity, these coins are fairly costly now. I paid $10.00 for the example you see in the photo, but a similar coin could cost $70.00 or more today. The earlier dates, and especially those before 1800, are particularly hard to find and quite expensive.

The 1855 would be harder to find if it were not for the fact that a large number turned up in a hoard. Another of the more commonly seen dates is 1853; the higher availability of this date is not easily explained as no hoard is known. A hoard of 1828 half cents was discovered in 1894 and thousands of 1833 and 1835 coins turned up in the 1930's. There were other hoards.

Mintage figures of 1831 and 1836 are suspect because some were restruck in the Mint by a night watchman, Theodore EckFeldt, in the 1850's.

A number of dates are listed as "Restrike" or "Mickley" in catalogs. These were produced by Joseph Mickley who had acquired rusted but quite usable dies sold by the Mint as scrap in the late 1850's. As copper coins were not classified as legal tender at that time, this was not actually illegal (that changed in 1933). Most of those dies were bought back by the Treasury in 1878 and presumably destroyed, but supposedly the 1823 dies still exist.

Half cents are interesting because of their checkered history and scarcity and perhaps because the hoards make finding high quality examples easier than for some other coins. I can look at that 1855 coin and imagine that it could have been spent by Abraham Lincoln or clutched by a run away slave.  Circulated coins always have a past, but we usually have no way of knowing what it was.

Comments

Submit a Comment

  • Blackspaniel1 profile image

    Blackspaniel1 

    4 years ago

    These are great coins, but expensive. Can you imagine getting 200 for a dollar bill? I cannot see getting one for a twenty dollar bill.

  • Pcunix profile imageAUTHOR

    Tony Lawrence 

    8 years ago from SE MA

    I was just reading the Wikipedia article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farthing_(British_coi...

    Thanks!

  • John Holden profile image

    John Holden 

    8 years ago

    @Pcunix. A full answer to the buying power of a farthing is probably a hubs worth but a broad and quick answer would say that when withdrawn it was already almost out of circulation and without value. In the medieval period it was worth roughly one modern pound or about US$1.6. though a direct comparison doesn't really work as the use of money has changed.

  • Pcunix profile imageAUTHOR

    Tony Lawrence 

    8 years ago from SE MA

    @gmagoldie: if collecting and studying coins for most of my lee and being a part time dealer and working for a dealer counts as "research" :)

    @kkalmes: let's hope things pick up soon. I'll do something on big coins next, maybe that will help!

  • KKalmes profile image

    KKalmes 

    8 years ago from Chicago, Illinois

    Hello PC, they might have to bring them back because that is about what I have been earning on hubpages and redgage for the past few months.

    Thanx for the info... reminds me, might be time to spend my coins for groceries.

  • GmaGoldie profile image

    Kelly Kline Burnett 

    8 years ago from Madison, Wisconsin

    Great Hub! You are amazing! Excellent writer and very well researched information.

  • Pcunix profile imageAUTHOR

    Tony Lawrence 

    8 years ago from SE MA

    I did not know that. What was its value in 1960 and how would that relate to the 13th century?

  • John Holden profile image

    John Holden 

    8 years ago

    Your hubs are always a joy to read thanks.

    Did you know that the smallest English coin, the farthing, was in circulation from the 13th century to the 1960s?

  • ngureco profile image

    ngureco 

    8 years ago

    Thank you for your good answer.

    I think that’s explains why you still use that small bill of one dollar. It never crossed my mind that Americans hardly uses paper money but credit cards – in this other part of the planet, we still use paper money and the smallest note is bigger than one dollar. Credit cards here are used by very few people but their use is all set to explode in the near future.

    Curiously, what’s seems to be catching steam here is the transfer of cash using mobile phone transfers where as little as a dollar can be transferred across different mobile phone accounts throughout the country – far much more money than the total for all commercial banks combined.

  • Pcunix profile imageAUTHOR

    Tony Lawrence 

    8 years ago from SE MA

    It's probably just custom, strongly influenced by the "almighty dollar" being the base of the currency. We could probably dispense with coinage and just round up or down and while people would grumble, they'd get used to it. Losing the dollar bill would likely cause riots :-)

    Though the velocity of bills may be less than you think. We use very little paper money - almost all of daily life is credit cards, bank transfers, checks. I often have no paper money at all in my wallet - between my wife and I we might use $20 a month.

  • ngureco profile image

    ngureco 

    8 years ago

    Nice article you have put up here about early coinages in the United States.

    I believe minting a coin should cost more than minting a banknote, and money with a lower denomination circulates at very high velocity and wears very fast unless it’s in form of coins. People of United States are people of value with per capita average $21587. This would mean that $1 is a very small thing to people of that country.

    If you will, my question to you is this: why does the US government allows the use of $1 notes which circulates at very high speed with a lot of wear, and as such are very expensive to maintain?

    I hope all is well. Stay well, and thank you.

working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)