ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Top Ten Failed Videogame Consoles

Updated on February 17, 2013
The RDI Halcyon was the most expensive videogame system ever made.
The RDI Halcyon was the most expensive videogame system ever made. | Source

Videogame consoles have a relatively brief but fascinating history. For every successful console, there are several that were abysmal failures. Many of these systems were created by electronics companies hoping to establish a niche in the videogame market. Others were made by established industry forces who, for one reason or another, made a major misstep. Common flaws that torpedoed these consoles’ chances of success were a high price, poor marketing, a lack of third party support, and poor design. Here is a top ten countdown of failed videogame systems.

Phillips CD-i
Phillips CD-i | Source

10. Phillips CD-i

Release Date: 1991

Why it failed: In the mid-90’s, Nintendo entered into a partnership with Phillips to produce a CD add-on to the Super Nintendo. The console never came to fruition, but Phillips gained the rights to make atrocious Super Mario and Legend of Zelda games for their own console. Phillips could never quite establish an identity for the CD-i. Was it a videogame system? A computer? A multimedia device? Consumers were confused, third party software developers were disinterested, and sales were abysmal. Phillips officially discontinued support for the CD-i in 1998.

Atari Jaguar
Atari Jaguar | Source

9. Atari Jaguar

Release Date: 1994

Why it failed: The Atari Jaguar was supposed to usher in Atari’s return as a market leader. Instead, it became a huge fiasco. The console was marketed as having sixty-four bits of processing power, four times that of the successful Super Nintendo and Sega Genesis systems. However, its claims were misleading. The Jaguar was really just a glorified sixteen bit system with a ridiculous seventeen button controller. Software developers found the console difficult to work with, and the Jaguar’s lack of sales made it even more unappealing. Atari discontinued the Jaguar in early 1996 with less than 250,000 units sold worldwide.

Virtual Boy
Virtual Boy | Source

8. Virtual Boy

Release Date: 1995

Why it failed: Nintendo has had many commercially successful consoles, but the Virtual Boy was one of their greatest failures. Virtual Boy was the first 3-D console and Nintendo hoped it would be revolutionary. Instead, it received a firestorm of criticism for its red and black graphics, small game library, and high price tag. Users sometimes experienced severe head and stomach aches after playing the console. Nintendo discontinued the Virtual Boy in 1996 after selling less than 800,000 units.

Panasonic 3D0
Panasonic 3D0 | Source

7. Panasonic 3D0

Release Date: 1993

Why it failed: Like the Jaguar, the 3D0 was marketed as a high end competitor to the SNES and Sega Genesis. It suffered many of the same problems, including a ridiculous price ($600) and a lack of third party support. The console had many poorly received games, including the infamous “Plumbers Don’t Wear Ties.” The 3D0 was marketed as a multimedia system, hoping that consumers would be fooled into thinking it was worth its price. The strategy failed, and the 3D0 faded away.

Apple Bandai Pippin
Apple Bandai Pippin | Source

6. Apple Bandai Pippin

Why it failed: The Pippin was yet another ‘90s attempt to market a videogame system as a multimedia player/computer/whatever. At $600, virtually no one was interested in purchasing the console. Consumers considered it an expensive videogame player, as opposed to a cheap computer. Third party support was nonexistent. The Pippin sold about 42,000 units in total. Most of the Pippins that had been produced were never sold. The console was discontinued in 1997.

Tiger Gizmondo
Tiger Gizmondo | Source

5. Tiger Telematics Gizmondo

Release Date: 2005

Why it failed: Despite its ridiculous name, the Gizmondo received a great deal of attention and hype when it was first released. The portable console was ahead of its time in some ways, with features like Bluetooth and a camera. Despite this, the Gizmondo was a colossal failure, selling only about 25,000 copies. In a bizarre marketing ploy, the Gizmondo was released with two different prices. Consumers could pay $400 for an ad free version, or $230 dollars for the privilege of seeing advertisements pop up on the device’s screen. Consumers quickly decided that the console was not worth either price. A whopping eight games were released in North America. Even fewer reached the European market. The Gizmondo was discontinued in 1997 and Tiger Telematic’s CEO was arrested for ties to the Swedish mob. After his downfall, the company filed for bankruptcy.

Sega Genesis with a 32X attached
Sega Genesis with a 32X attached | Source

4. Sega 32X

Release Date: 1994

Why it failed: The 32X was a colossal marketing blunder by Sega. It was conceived as an add-on for their successful Genesis console. Sega hoped that the 32X would revitalize the Genesis until the release of the Sega Saturn. But, with the release of Saturn just a year away, the 32X seemed pointless. Only five games were released as developers quickly turned their focus to the Saturn (itself a failure compared to the Sony Playstation and Nintendo 64). Between the Sega CD, 32X, and Saturn, Sega flooded the market with too many incremental updates.

Tiger | Source

3. Tiger

Release Date: 1997

Why it failed: Known for their handheld games, Tiger released the portable console in the hopes of competing with Nintendo’s Game Boy. could access the internet, but only by connecting to a modem. Playing with other users online was impossible. Tiger didn’t help matters by creating an infamous television ad campaign in which an actor playing a company spokesman insulted and mocked gamers, saying that the console had more games than most gamers had brain cells. Ironically, only about twenty games were released. was discontinued in 2000 after selling less than 300,000 consoles.

Nokie N-Gage
Nokie N-Gage | Source

2. Nokia N-Gage Classic

Release Date: 2003

Why it failed: The N –Gage was an ugly portable console that could also be used as a cell phone. It had an awkward control setup that inhibited gameplay. Using it as a cellphone wasn’t easy, either. Unlike, the N-Gage allowed multiplayer gaming over the internet. However, this was not enough to save the console from failure. Its sloppy design soon made it infamous. The console was discontinued until 2004, although an N-Gage mobile gaming service was available until 2010.

RDI Halcyon
RDI Halcyon | Source

1. RDI Halcyon

Release Date: 1985

Why it failed: This extremely obscure system was very ambitious for its time. The Halcyon was released with an outrageous price tag of $2,500. It was marketed as a multimedia system and featured a laserdisc player and a keyboard. Only two games were released, one of which came with the console. The Halcyon featured an early form of voice recognition. Users could speak commands instead of using the keyboard. Its games featured full motion video capabilities. The console might have been a success if it had been cheaper and better marketed. The Halcyon received a very limited release and sales were virtually nonexistent. RDI failed for bankruptcy a short time later.

Promotional Video for the RDI Halcyon


What do you think is the most significant reason for why these consoles failed?

See results

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)