ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

1984: How Orwell's Proposed Future Has Changed. A Modern Literary Extrapolation.

Updated on August 20, 2015
Mitch Charman profile image

Mitchell Charman is a storyteller. He loves crafting new worlds, characters, and ideas, and studying why we as humans need story to survive.


The Introduction

The renowned George Orwell novel 1984, first published in 1949, is utterly fantastic. The issues it raises regarding propaganda, surveillance, and mass thought control are still applicable today, but could perhaps benefit from an upgrade six decades on.

For those unfamiliar with the the novel, Orwell essentially outlined a dystopian totalitarian society, run by the ‘Party’, in which every citizen is a depersonalised number, forced into complete oppression under Party ideologies. It identifies a whole host of fascist and communist propaganda techniques, offering the reader a proposed future taking these feared concepts to their logical extreme (but more on this in a second). If you have not read it already, you absolutely need to stop reading this and go find a copy (there's a cheap one here).

The future, the year 1984, offered a world where the authoritative corruption of the time continued and intensified. While no rational mind understood the text as a literal possibility of the future, it certainly struck a chord in many people as to how easily authority could steal an individual’s freedom and identity from within his or her own mind. Brainwashing had become a reality.

As time progressed the fear of fascism and communism peaked and subsided, but the propaganda techniques and mass surveillance Orwell warned us about have become more prevalent than ever. The internet wasn’t even within our realm of understanding, but Orwell predicted the privacy concerns we face today over sixty years ago with television screens in citizens homes that could watch you. We experience more subconscious ‘encouragement’ now than ever before through careful manipulation of words and images to elicit the emotions others want us to feel, exactly as the Party did in 1984. Perhaps the most worrying of all is the helpful yet unnerving existence of targeted advertising.

The Concept

Orwell did what is called, for purposes of this Hub, a ‘literary extrapolation’. He proposed a fictional future based on the acute enhancement of certain circumstances as they currently stood. While all dystopian sci-fi novels do this to some degree — that is, after all, their purpose: reflecting human nature in a predicted future, similar enough to be relatable but extreme enough to be considered bleak and undesirable — Orwell's 1984 almost completely revolved around the concept.

He did this incredibly well in ’49, and these issues only gained mainstream attention because of him. But the times are, inevitably, moving forward, so I’d like to perform a ‘revisited literary extrapolation’ in the context of the ideas raised in 1984. Imagine writing Orwell’s novel today about the issues we are still facing, taken to their logical extreme 35 years from now (2050).


Big Brother is still watching you.
Big Brother is still watching you.

The Extrapolation

Let’s first consider the term ‘extrapolation’ for those unfamiliar with it or would benefit from a refresher. Most often used in mathematics, it means ‘to extend based on a current trend’. In other words, if the methods of propaganda and thought control — as they currently stand — continue intensifying at the rate they have been, how will 2050 look? In this scenario, to maintain consistency with 1984, we will ignore extrapolated environmental issues.

What should initially be outlined, while 2050 will be a ‘dystopia’, is this suggested future could not be considered bleak by any measure. The only way an authoritative body could suppress westernised society is by making the masses want to be a part of it. No one would stand for a decrepit, smoggy future. Colour and video would keep us entertained, and material luxuries would create the illusion everything is alright.

Assuming some form of democracy remained, political agendas would persuade us more than ever. The wording used would be so emotionally triggering there’s no telling what they’ll convince us to do or believe. But the government’s control over us won’t be the problem. It’ll be the large companies.

If consumerism trends extrapolate into 2050 at the rate they are, we will all be slaves to highly addictive products. All foodstuffs will contain the scientifically ideal level of sugar, the bliss point, creating a society physically dependent on the food and drink we’re told we like. Sadly, this isn’t an extreme way of the future, this is now.
For more information regarding the sinister research companies are conducting to addict you to their product, I recommend checking out Damon Gameau's That Sugar Book which can be purchased here and its film counterpart That Sugar Film.

The film that revealed everything.
The film that revealed everything.

Our collective attention span has decreased rapidly over recent years due to the ease of access and extreme competition of video content. Video clips must become more entertaining and get to the point quicker or else we’ll stop watching, so 2050 would be filled with fragmented video segments at fractions of seconds long. This flashing, subconscious-targeting content would render us entirely susceptible to corporations’s carefully orchestrated messages.

Advertising would certainly be the biggest dystopian element of this proposed future. Currently, online ads are tailored to you based on your search history, age, gender, and a whole host of other factors. The recorded data of your your search history and your online presence knows more about you than you know about yourself: it knows your medical conditions, your relationship problems, that you cleaned red wine off your carpet using vinegar and bi-carb a year ago today. It knows what you look like and how you’re ageing, your taste in movies, music, it knows the words you can’t spell and your philosophical views. Social media is even worse, having the ability to target adverts specifically to you based on every physical attribute and digitally recorded action you give them (age, relationship status, location, the places you go, the content you're interested in etc.). It knows, based on your pictures, what you look like and even what clothing brands you wear. Imagine a 2050 where your entire personality is stored, forming a completely individualised customer profile toward which they target ads.

If a corporations were to get a hold of that information (or if they initiated the collection of data themselves or, say, purchase it from a certain search engine company) there’d be no need for generic advertising ever again. They would know exactly how you feel and how to change how you feel. As you walked down the street, facial recognition software would identify you based on your online presence and display the perfect ad for you while you look at it, and for someone else when you look away.

Big Brother is persuading you.
Big Brother is persuading you.

But while they would record your personality and could easily alter it, no one would take it away from you. Even today, individualism is synonymous with freedom. It doesn’t matter if you’re stuck in a work-farm job in the same suit and tie as three hundred other people so long as you can go home, watch what you want to watch, drink what you want to drink, and think what you want to think, even if all these factors were influenced by those who want you to be a certain way. Orwell’s future took away this freedom of choice, or at least made freedom's absence too obvious, which is why it could never work today.

Freedom, or its appearance, would certainly be maintained, even if it didn't exist. Companies may even ironically state their support of freedom by referencing 1984 while influencing you to buy their product, but I don't think anyone's that obvious about it...

The Conclusion (or Encouraged Continuation)

There is so much more to write about a dystopian future given what we know now. This Hub could extend indefinitely, forever elaborating on ways George Orwell’s 1984 predictions have shifted for 2050. But now it’s up to you. I’d absolutely love for this post to turn into a discussion in the comments.

I absolutely encourage people to disagree with anything or everything I've said because diverse thoughts create discussion, which form more educated ideas and smooth out rough edges. I'd like nothing more than getting a low rating (and be sure to cast your vote), because the more people disagree, the bigger the discussion will get! But don't rate low unless you're willing to back up why.

If you’re too worried your comment will be attacked, I welcome personal messages and emails, too (but do certainly try to post about it. I'll maintain a friendly and constructive environment)!

What did you think of this proposed future?

4 out of 5 stars from 1 rating of this literary extrapolation!


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • B Brian Hill profile image

      B Brian Hill 

      5 years ago

      I think your insights are very accurate, and you've expressed them in engaging detail. I guess the question is, for those of us who are thinking similar thoughts, is what do we do, and is it possible to change the path of disaster that we are on?

    • Mitch Charman profile imageAUTHOR

      Mitchell Charman 

      5 years ago from Western Australia

      I completely agree with you FatBoyThin, your rationality prevails. Thanks for your interest.

      Thank you Mel! I appreciate the compliment. I agree that the only way a totalitarian -- or, as you said, oligarchic -- society could result from current trends extrapolating at their current rate is by the illusion of freedom rather than the reality of oppression. We shall certainly see.

    • Mel Carriere profile image

      Mel Carriere 

      5 years ago from Snowbound and down in Northern Colorado

      I don't think Orwell was too far off the mark. The NSA can actually watch us through our built in computer cameras we use for Skping, which is creepy. As you have alluded to, perhaps even more insidious than the Orwellian vision is that although we think we are a free society, being able to choose our leaders through a democratic process, perhaps we are not. As you said, unrelenting advertising keeps us in line with a consumerist philosophy, and this in turn makes us turn a blind eye to the Big Brother oligarchy that really runs the show. Great hub.

    • FatBoyThin profile image

      Colin Garrow 

      5 years ago from Inverbervie, Scotland

      Fascinating stuff - interesting and scary. I do think the very fact that Orwell's book exists and that its message is generally understood, allows us to examine our society and look at how governments and large corporations use information to manipulate the population. These days, people aren't so ready to swallow propaganda as in the past, and given that governments and large corporations are also made up of individuals (who presumably aren't all megalomaniacs), should prevent any single group from getting out of control. Of course, we had a similar situation with Hitler...

    • Mitch Charman profile imageAUTHOR

      Mitchell Charman 

      5 years ago from Western Australia

      "Vibrant deception than a cold nothingness." Perfect summary Josh.

      I like how you've taken these individual points and tied them together within the idea of a government's and corporations's reliance on each other, a perfect elaboration on the article's skeleton framework. It also explains how 2050 could still be a dystopian totalitarian society, which my central Hub didn't explain and merely assumed.

    • profile image


      5 years ago

      An interesting attempt to define something that could be seen as a New Wave Dystopia: redefining the bleakness of an existence as more of a vibrant deception than a cold nothingness. It's Orwell recontextualised.

      The propaganda model does imply that rather than solely blaming corporations for our mess, that the government and corporations in a capitalist society require support of each other for success. So to suggest the government doesn't have control is to disconnect them from holding any role at all. But maybe that is the perception that will be gained through the deception of the media? Maybe the feeling of freedom will come from the perceived democratisation of social media; people will feel as though they have a voice without realising how filtered the messages they receive are. This won't change the power of the government, but just allow them to move away from receiving flak and then therefore give them more opportunity to act surreptitiously.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)