ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

A Tale of Two Scenarios

Updated on June 7, 2020
jackclee lm profile image

Jack is a volunteer at the CCNY Archives. Before retiring, he worked at IBM for over 28 years. His articles have over 120,000 views.


Climate change has been in the news for the past 30 years or so. Al Gore was one of the early guru that projected bad things down the road if we did not heed his warning. The public was not convinced either way. Partly due to the long time frame, partly due to the lack of validation of projections, crisis seems to come and go and the people are just oblivious.

This current pandemic has created a good experiment. There seems to be two scenarios. One in which some blames the pandemic on our lack of preparation, while another blames it on act of God or nature.

In either case, it is a good thing. We now can get to the bottom of the theory of AGW, or man-caused global warming.

- May 2020


The Green New Deal as proposed by some activists, is one way to address the problems of climate change. It is an expensive proposition. By some estimates, it would cost $6.6 trillion annually. That is three times the annual tax revenue and about 34% of our GDP.

With this pandemic, we have shut down our economy temporarily and borrowed $3 trillion to help pay for the lack of production.

Some has asked the question, where does the money come from?

Another cynic ask, if we could not afford the Green New Deal to save our planet, how did we find the money to fight this pandemic?

The two scenario is very interesting. On the one hand, this pandemic has clearly point to a problem of priority with our government.

On the other hand, you can say climate change was not that dire compared to this pandemic. Perhaps, it was oversold.

Scenario One

The following is an excerpt from a newsletter from the Thomson Reuter Foundation Center.

"Over the past few months of the COVID-19 pandemic, it’s become more apparent than ever how closely climate change is tied up with all of our other problems - and opportunities.

Better rainwater harvesting to cope with drought is now providing hand-washing water during the pandemic, for instance. Stretched-thin emergency services around the world are worrying about how to deal with cyclone and hurricane season alongside the virus threat. How do you social distance in an evacuation shelter?

Meanwhile, trillions of dollars – the money policymakers told us they didn’t have to deal with climate change – are now being spent to stop our economies flatlining. If that cash can be spent on the right things – from better broadband to renewable power, cycle lanes to social safety nets – it could help build the fairer, greener societies that we’ll need to combat the next big threat: climate change."

Scenario Two

This past three months, we have achieved the impossible. We have deliberately stopped or curtailed human activities in order to address a deadly pandemic. The results should be eye opening. In a short period of time, we will have some validation about our efforts to combat global warming or climate change.

We will know, if the efforts of the past month made a dent on our climate.


What is profound is the stuff we can only dream about. Imagine a world where we can control our behavior to the point of affecting our climate. Is this possible? or even likely? There are currently 7 billion people living on this planet. They are using our natural resources such as water, food and minerals and energy...

Each person has a carbon footprint.

The AGW theory is that we humans, by burning fossil fuels, product so much CO2 gases, that it acts like a greenhouse on our planet and is contributing to the majority of the warming in the 21st century.

This is only a theory and unproven.

With the temporary quarantine, we have a window into the workings of our planet. Can we affect our climate by controlling our activities? That is the big question.

Two Possible Outcomes

As I see it, there can be two possible outcomes.

First, we can detect a noticeable difference in our global temperature as a result of the quarantine. This will give us a good gage on what we need to do in the future if we are to stop global warming.

Second, it may be totally undetectable and whatever we do have no effect and make no difference. The earth is just too big. Anything we try to do is lost in the noise.

This is actually a good experiment. If the second possibility is confirmed, then it really free us from going down the insane path of implementing the Green New Deal.


Let the data reveal the truth. Follow the science. We need answers. Is global warming human induced, or are we just bystanders?

Postscript - 6/7/2020

I received the following email response from someone representing the UCS, Union of Concerned Scientists, a group active in climate change issues.


Thank you for contacting UCS. Unfortunately, as you know, we are in a dangerous public health crisis that’s endangering lives and communities. Despite the urgent need for a clean energy transition, this decline in fossil fuel use and fossil fuel pollution is no cause for celebration, resulting from unprecedented societal disruption, borne on the backs of working people. This reduction in emissions is also ephemeral, with no thoughtful policies guiding it and likely to last only as long as the immediate health and economic crises persist. Past experiences with economic recessions show that emissions rebound quickly in response to stimulus measures and economic recovery. This was the experience after the 2008-2009 recession, for example. As such, UCS is not doing work to focus on or quantify this temporary effect.


My original question submitted to their website:

I have a question of a scientific nature relating the COVID-19 quarantine to the effects on climate change.

Here is the question -

Assume AGW is correct, and human activities, including use of fossil fuel contributes to the increase of CO2 emissions and green house effect.

The current quarantine of the past three months has drastically reduced all human activities around the globe.

The question for you scientists is, will we see a noticeable effect in the climate temperature data as a result?

and how large will that effect be? even if it is temporary...


It is interesting for me, and quite revealing, the cavalier response from UCS. Why the lack of interest? Where is the intellectual curiosity of knowing what effect our human contribution have on climate change? This is a once in a lifetime opportunity. If the results are significant, it would point to a workable solution going forward.

Here is my postulate:

1. Assume the theory of AGW is correct, then we should be able to measure or quantify that effect.

2. This quarantine due to the COVID-19 virus pandemic, should be a showcase event.

3. The proposed solution to climate change, such as reduction of fossil fuel consumption and conversion to renewable energy sources, should be able to make a noticeable difference.

Alternatively, if no difference is detectable, then we need to revisit the whole theory of whether humans have been the primary cause of recent global warming in the past 30 years.

This content is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and is not meant to substitute for formal and individualized advice from a qualified professional.

© 2020 Jack Lee


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Marie Flint profile image

      Marie Flint 

      12 months ago from Jacksonville, FL USA

      When I was in high school, I thought I wanted to be a scientist; however, science requires the ability to accurately measure data, a control group, and the ability to interpret data from planned experiments, which, in themselves, may have flaws. I couldn't pursue a path that I didn't feel actually certain and passionate about. The scientific method, in my mind, doesn't prove anything.

      On the issue of climate change, at first I believed humans did contribute to the "problem" of pollution and so-called warming, which, supposedly will really be a mini-Ice Age. Then, I heard of an observed fact that made sense--WE are a part of nature and fit into the cycles of transformation. It's not so much that we are destroying nature as it is that we are transforming ourselves.

      Personally, I enjoy harvesting my own food that i grew without pesticides and herbicides. I never liked automobiles, although I will drive one in an emergency and there seems to be no other alternative. I can't expect everyone to live as I do. That would be a boring world, indeed.

      As far as the COVID-19 virus, how do you quarantine animals, especially birds? We are linked to these creatures. I rather lean toward the "herd immunity" theory, which states we have always had these viruses and naturally develop immunity to them as we are exposed to them.

      All I can do is be myself. Yes, I can wear a mask if required for a short period of time (less than 24 hours), but I have no interest in vaccines.

      Cycles turn, nature always comes through them. We are social creatures designed to socialize and even hug.

    • Ericdierker profile image

      Eric Dierker 

      12 months ago from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A.

      Well done and an interesting point of inquiry. I want to see the raw data and not opinions in this area. Opinions are made by those who get more money if the news is bad.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)