ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Micro-Apartments and Sustainable Building Design

Updated on September 30, 2012
Micro-Apartments are small but make a big impact in sustainability
Micro-Apartments are small but make a big impact in sustainability | Source

Micro-apartments are nothing new in sustainable building design. These small living quarters have long been in use in world cities with space shortages, like Tokyo. Yet they have never caught on in America for a few reasons. First, the U.S. has plenty of space and the simple thing to do has always been to expand. Then, larger families required more—not less—space. What may be most revealing is that sustainable urban planning has never been a priority.

But things have changed drastically.

Today most people in the world live in cities, with the projection being 70 percent by 2050. The U.S. now gains 100 million people every 50 years, packing into cities where urban sprawl is becoming a serious issue. Further, families are much smaller, including the fact that one- and two-person homes now constitute a large percentage of city dwellers.

So the “plenty” of U.S. space no longer exists where most folk live and family size has shrunk. Guess what we’re now forced to do? That’s right—think sustainable.

What Are Micro-Apartments?

Micro-apartments, or micro-units, are apartments with a footprint of about 350 square feet or less—somewhere close to the size of a parking space. In Japan’s densely populated cities efficiency apartments have become common for people, often younger with modest budgets and that do not wish to leave the urban center. Designers came up with well-thought out ways to include needed functions without sacrificing quality living.

Micro-housing is a highly sustainable aspect of urban design, as it contributes to compact cities that require less infrastructure costs, resources, and environmental impact.

Japan is not the only place around the world to implement small-scale sustainable houses. Other fine examples are Paris and Barcelona. The trend has been on the American scene for a short time and is gaining momentum. Chicago and San Jose, for instance, are two cities that have nicely included micro-units in their quest for urban sustainability. New York and San Francisco are now becoming ground-zero locations on the issue.

Would you live in a micro-apartment?

See results

Micro-Units in San Francisco and New York

In two of America’s greenest cities, New York and San Francisco, it is ironic that micro-housing enters with a splash. San Francisco is experiencing an influx of young, high-earning technology workers that need to be closer to their companies, which are opting for the urban core as opposed to Silicon Valley. Rent rates have skyrocketed, with average studio apartment rates standing at $2,126.

The city is scheduled to vote on legislation to change its building code to lower the minimum size for apartments and so allow for micro-housing—as small as 220 square feet. Opponents have taken to calling the proposed housing “Twitter apartments.”

In New York things are similar but more complicated. The city doesn’t have enough studios and one-bedroom apartments for the 1.8 million one- and two-person households in the city—along with the projected 900,000 coming. So Mayor Bloomberg and the City created adAPT NYC, an urban planning competition for designers to come up with a micro-apartment proposal for an existing residential tower. Two-thirds of the tower will be micro-units (about 80 apartments) between 250 and 350 square feet. AdAPT NYC is only the first of a three-part housing endeavor to address New York City’s unique housing problems.

How to Live in a Micro-Unit

Concerns with Micro-Housing

Micro-apartments pass the test of sustainability, but some frown on them in other ways.

Some say micro-housing is laudable but only as integrated into a building with a variety of units, not as a building type. Others see micro-housing as undermining zone regulations that protect the public. This could only occur if safety requirement are being relaxed, which isn’t happening.

The real concern is whether the units will be affordable. If only the young, tech-savvy, and fairly well-to-do are claiming these dwellings, a social sustainability issue lingers as low-income residents are only squeezed between a flourishing city core and wealthy suburbs. The adAPT NYC project affords 20 percent of its micro-unit project to low-income residents.

Micro-apartments are an excellent sustainable building plan that revitalizes urban cores and meets the needs of hardworking individuals and overcrowding cities.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • ithabise profile image

      Michael S. 5 years ago from Winston-Salem, NC

      I like your ideas, about long distance commutes and dorm rooms. It will be interesting to see how this takes root in America. We do like our space: I know I do! Cheers!

    • GlstngRosePetals profile image

      GlstngRosePetals 5 years ago from Wouldn't You Like To Know

      I could see mico apartments used for long distance work commuters at a job site or close by. Even a substitute for dorm rooms, but long term could pose a host of other problems like cabin fever for instance. I dont think micro apartments are such a good idea for amaricans that are so used to having space. Great hub. Voted up!!!

    • ithabise profile image

      Michael S. 5 years ago from Winston-Salem, NC

      Tiny indeed! I can understand their usefulness as well, but I think they're better used to offer know, make them common in standard building projects. An entire building of micro-units...I don't know. Just seems that despite safety measures and all, that could be ugly if there were a fire or quake that destroyed the entire (compact) thing. Thanks for reading!

    • Pamela99 profile image

      Pamela Oglesby 5 years ago from United States

      Micro apartments are really small and I don't think I would like them, but if the location is convenient I can see why some people would. Interesting hub.

    • ithabise profile image

      Michael S. 5 years ago from Winston-Salem, NC

      Haha..."back in the Stone Age." I'm sure you're full of vitality, whatever your age. But the way trends come and go these days, with such rapidity, I suppose personal history can seem way-back-when. I think I could live in one of these if I had to, but it's not for everybody. Just a matter of being simple and organized, I think. Thanks for reading and commenting, DrBJ - Cheers.

    • drbj profile image

      drbj and sherry 5 years ago from south Florida

      When I first got married, back in the Stone Age, I thought our apartment was a micro-apartment but compared to these you have illustrated, it was positively roomy. Thanks for the info, ithabise.