ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • India & South Asia Political & Social Issues

Caste, Martial Races and the Indian Army

Updated on June 16, 2015

The beginning


In the 17th century the British looking for a route and trade with India formed the East India Company. The company soon became a major player in India and by the beginning of the 19th century had become literally the ruler in the sub-continent. This was because of an ingenious process of divide and rule. The East India company set up its own army and this in due course became the British Indian Army. The modern Indian army thus traces its lineage to the days of the British Raj. The British Indian army became the Indian army after the exit of the English in 1947

The East India Company had recruited their force on certain considerations. They based their consideration on their own experience in India and also the socio-political atmosphere as well as history. The British accepted the Hindu division of caste and recruitment was carried on that basis. They accepted the Hindu concept of the Kshatriya as a warrior class and confined recruitment to the higher castes and completely cut out the lower castes from the process of army recruitment. The British thus left behind an army based on caste. In the entire world no such parallel of a army based on caste exists. The army was also a higher caste army and unwittingly the British perpetuated the caste division in India.

Gurkha troops of army
Gurkha troops of army

Concept of Martial and Non-Martial races

Along with caste the British brought in another element which was based on their experience in India. The British divided the castes into martial and non-martial classes and confined their recruitment to the martial races. Thus the British firstly accepted caste as the basis of recruitment and secondly confined the recruitment to the so called martial castes.

The British concept of the martial caste was as per their reading of history. They were of the opinion that races that had faced perpetual conflicts and wars were more amenable to discipline and could be better soldiers. At that time the British were only looking for soldiers as the army had only European officers of British descent.

The British ths enlisted men from certain regions like the Punjab and North West frontier, regions which had seen invasions since the time of Alexander the Great. They recruited other martial races like the Rajputs who glorified war. In addition they added their own experience of battle with the Indians and the Sikhs, Gurkha and Muslims from the Frontier were foremost in the field of recruitment to the Indian army.


Do you think the British were right in having a caste based army ?

See results
Sikhs
Sikhs
Sikh troops with british officer
Sikh troops with british officer

The British Were Right After All

Were the British right in this differentiation of martial and non-martial races? There is a lot of discussion on this , but the fact is the British policy paid rich dividend for the empire. The British Indian army helped the allies win 2 World wars and as is well known the main battles in Mesopotamia against the Turks in World War I and the Japanese ( 8th Army) were fought by a dominant Indian force.

The British Indian army also fought in the Afghan wars and the Invasion of Tibet. Not many may be aware that the Punjab troops were also used in the Boxer rebellion in China. The British Indian army was one of the pillars of the Raj and helped keep far flung British territories under the British flag. No doubt it was a mercenary army, but such things happen in history.

Indian troops during the Raj
Indian troops during the Raj

After 1947: Nehru and Congress Retain British Concepts

Once the second World war was over the British realized that holding India would not be easy as teh army on who they had relied for over 150 years had become suspect. Many had joined teh INA of Subhas Bose and some also joined Hitler and formed the Indian Legion. A mutiny in the Navy convinced the British that teh time had come for them to go. They left India in 1947.

The inheritors of British rule the Congress party and Nehru decided that the caste based regiments be retained. This was a step that did not go down well with a few, but the view of Nehru prevailed. Even Gandhi who had for long been a proponent of the varna system agreed that caste based regiments were a necessity.This was a practical step as these regiments had their own war cries and food and religious habits.


Despite the British leaving India the caste composition of the army, in particular the Infantry regiments remained. Now 70 years down the line the battalions of Dogras, Sikhs, Gurkha, Jats, Rajputs among other continue in the Indian army. The new raisings do not have a caste composition , but the old regiments remain.

Indian army is perhaps teh only army in the world that is a caste based army and yet is highly efficient and effective and well respected all over the world.

Indian troops World war I
Indian troops World war I

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • emge profile image
      Author

      Madan 2 years ago from Abu Dhabi

      Thank you Lawrence for your comment. yest the caste based army has distinguished itself in battle s all over

    • lawrence01 profile image

      Lawrence Hebb 2 years ago from Hamilton, New Zealand

      Fascinating. The British used an instrument of indian culture for their own purposes yet it was retained after independence as it was seen to work!

      From experience I can say the class system is alive and well in the British Army as well.

      Enjoyed the read and learning about the Indian Army

      Lawrence

    working