ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Change From the Inside: A Fool's Errand

Updated on July 13, 2020
Retired Shoe profile image

I am a leftist who loves reading about political theory and how it shapes our world today.

Change. A word spoken by many politicians and touted as the main function of the government. In the US there is a real sense that we, the common people, can change things. We elect representatives, congress members, the president, whenever we need someone to represent us we elect them. We choose the people who understand us. People who possess integrity, intellect, honesty, etc. Through this proxy we, the people, are the real ones making the decisions in the government. We decide what is best for us and what changes need to be made to make our lives better. If all of this is true, then why do we continue to live in squalor? Why do people still go hungry? Why are people going bankrupt from medical bills? Why are there still people living on the streets? Are we to blame for this? Have we not made the correct decisions? Do we really know what is best for us? What changes can we make from the inside to combat these problems?

Change From the Inside

Changes from the inside. What exactly does that mean? Well, we elect people to represent us. Those people go on to pass laws and policies that help us. Laws that give us rights, policies that give us healthcare. Through this action of electing representatives and officials, we can slowly morph policies into ones that benefit the people. We can send letters, make calls, and sometimes even personally talk to government officials to appeal to them. We can tell them what we want and how they can make that happen. The government expresses the will of the people. Then, as I previously asked, why hasn’t this fixed all of our problems? If the government is essentially an extrapolated interpretation of the will of the people, why are the people still suffering?


It’s simple: it’s in the best interest of the government to not change. Why would the government change? Why would we need these policies that would help the people? America has survived so long without them, why would we need them now? The government is not made up of representatives of the people, rather, it is made up of representatives of capital.

Politicians are at the top of the social hierarchy. They dictate what happens to everyone below them. Why would someone want to lose that control? Why would somebody want to make the lower castes’ situations better when it would only give them less control? Oh, but the constitution! All politicians must follow the constitution! It is like god to the priests. The priests speak the words of god and only that. They cannot twist what comes from god’s almighty mouth. What kind of priest is the politician to the constitution? How can the constitution be a god to these people when the people have the ability to twist their words? Prohibition came about from the constitution and was taken away by the constitution. What kind of god bends to its priests’ will?

Politicians not only are able to rewrite the constitution when they see fit, but they also have the ability to keep its worst parts. Take the 13th amendment for example. It outlaws slavery, except when it is used as punishment in prison. Why would politicians still allow modern-day slavery, especially when we are so far removed from its abolishment? Because it benefits them, or more specifically, it benefits their lobbyists. Corporations can use lawful slavery as a means of producing what they need. This use of slavery directly benefits corporations and does nothing for the common person. Why then is it still allowed? What benefit does the small business owner, the single mother, or the impoverished factory worker set to gain from the enslavement of prisoners?


What about rights then? Doesn’t the government grant us rights? To that, I would ask: what good are rights that can be taken away? What good is free speech when the government has the power to limit it? What good is the right to bear arms when the government can take guns away? The government uses rights as an excuse to rule over the people. And when the people do not listen, their rights can be taken away.


So the government has the power to manipulate itself to justify its existence. But can’t we elect new people to make changes that can stop these abuses of power? The problem with that notion is the assumption that the government would even allow people who want to make changes. Voter suppression is rampant in both major political parties. The government would not want to allow someone to be president if they wished to upend the system. If this notion is not true, then why has the status quo been kept for so long?


There is also an argument to be made about the people’s vote not mattering. The electoral college bars candidates from winning even if they get the popular vote. How is that representative of the people’s will? If the majority of Americans want somebody as president, they should get to choose. Instead, there is a system put into place to limit how influential the people are over elections. Even if the electoral college was abolished there would still be little choice in how the president actually controls the government. The people do not elect all of the important officials needed to keep the machine running. We do not elect supreme court justices or the president’s cabinet, two very important groups within the government. If the supreme court is supposed to assure the American people that they have equal justice under the law, why do we not get to appoint who we best see fit? If the cabinet is supposed to advise the president on their specific areas, then why can’t we elect people who we know are professionals in those areas rather than whoever the president thinks will agree with them the most?


Direct Action

So if the government is designed in such a way as to keep control out of the people’s hands, then what are we to do? I believe direct action to be the only solution. Direct action is the term for acts in which the people take economic and social matters into their own hands, rather than appealing to the government for assistance. This can manifest itself in different ways: charity, protesting, forming worker’s unions, helping those in your community, etc. Direct action is the language of oppressed peoples. It is the way in which the people show that they are unsatisfied with their conditions and their government.


Historically speaking, direct action has been the only way significant change has come to a society. The peasants of Russia would have never been truly freed from serfdom if the Russian Revolution never happened. The American people would have lived under the tyrannical rule of George III without the American Revolution. The people of India would have never become independent without the Salt March. Black Americans would not have gotten rights without the Civil Rights Movement. The list goes on and on.


The government’s ambition for control shines through when direct action is used: the British went to war with America, people were jailed for marching during the Civil Rights movement, the Russian government jailed people for speaking against the Tsar, etc. Even now we see this kind of suppression. Recently President Trump threatened to make it a felony to even attempt to harm federal monuments--even punishable by ten years in prison. People who have committed federal offenses are not allowed to vote in most states. It is no surprise that he wishes to take away people’s right to vote when they carry out direct action.


So what kind of direct action can we take today? Spreading information about the failings of the government, protesting, sharing stories about injustice, etc. can all show people what is wrong with what goes on in the US. Direct action must not only be taken when injustice occurs but at every opportunity there is.


Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Retired Shoe profile imageAUTHOR

      Matthew Smith 

      3 weeks ago from Iowa

      Hi CJ

      I would like to say thank you for reading and commenting, I appreciate it! But I do disagree with the points you made.

      1. I should say I don't understand what point you are trying to make here. Is Donald Trump making people's opinions of the government more hopeless? I would agree with that to some extent, but I wouldn't say that's changing things from the inside. I would say he is actually making people MORE content with the government because of how his followers seem to stand by him without question.

      2. Gorbachev was better than other Russian leaders at the time, that much is true. But I feel that has had little lasting impact on Russia. They have been invading Ukraine and Putin has been able to game the system to stay in power longer than he should.

      3. Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid did come from government action, but I believe that these systems are not good enough. I feel as if these systems are meant to keep people complacent. People will still be upset as long as they do not have free access to healthcare, and Medicare and Medicaid do not accomplish that.

      Again, thank you for reading.

    • lions44 profile image

      CJ Kelly 

      3 weeks ago from PNW

      Great topic. But I have to disagree with your conclusions by arguing that the only way to make lasting change is to work within the system. It is a disregard of that system which has led not just to our current problems, but those of the past as well.

      1. Donald Trump - In a way, Trump and his minions are a form of direct action. He was considered an "outsider" who will drain the swamp. He's not. But that perception and overall loss of faith in government led to his rise. That is why so much of this hopeless talk about our institutions is dangerous.

      2. Mikail Gorbachev - He bided his time within the system, though a repulsive one, and worked to better his country. Eventually, it led to the liberation of Eastern Europe and most of those nations are thriving now. Russia is still a mess, but at least some good came from Gorbachev's changes.

      3. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc, all came from government action. It can be done. Just takes will Abandoning the system won't help.

      Marching and protesting is great, but eventually you have to get in the game.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)