ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Class Warfare-I think not

Updated on February 10, 2011


Conservatives are frequently accusing Progressives of picking on the wealthy merely because of the fact that they have become materially more successful than those in the working and middle classes. Nothing could be further from the truth. I celebrate the success of the wealthy well to do and certainly want to imitate them. The fact that they drive a Jaguar while I drive a Chevy is of no concern to me. After all, they are both modes of transportation and my Chevy can get me to and from my destination just as effectively.


 I am concerned about the influence of money and power as a method of making it less likely that any of us mere commoners can successfully follow in their paths. I speak about Thurston Howell and the corporations coming to my congressional representatives, plying them with bags of money supposedly to help promote their candidacy or hand over large sums to their opponents to insure the incumbent’s defeat. We are not children; we all know that these sums are not merely given to the incumbent or their opponent, without expecting something done on behalf of the donor in return. These obligations may involve the successful congressperson taking positions on issues of the day contrary to the best interests of the majority of his/her constituents to satisfy the obligation to the donor. Whether it is one political party or the other, we know that, in spite of Rush Limbaugh’s statement that the Congress is made up of big boys and girls who are beyond letting large sums of money influence their judgment, we just have to watch the daily broadcasts to see that such is not the case. There is no reason why someone with vast sums of money should have a voice and influence in the corridors of legislative power any greater than you or I, regardless of the fact that he or she owns a Jaguar.

Yes, I am aware of the Conservative argument that references the power of the Unions, George Soros and such. But, can we all agree that for both sides the tempting influence of money in our political campaigns need to be further curbed? I still see a great deal more resistance to this idea from the Conservative side of the ideological divide than from the Progressives. Conservatives say that this represents free speech, but money to candidates is not speech but more corruption. I also find it very disturbing that the Conservatives in Congress voted not too long ago to resist the idea of the disclosure of the identity of donors to political campaigns. It seems sinister and dishonest on its face, so what gives? Who is trying to hide something and why?

We all know of the corrupting influence of money in politics, and to try to deny it is sheer lunacy. Yes, Thurston Howell, you can have that fabulous residence and expensive wardrobe, but tenets that form the basis of our democracy are not for sale, ever.

(Thurston Howell is a fictional character not meant to be representative of the many affluent people who make positive contributions to our society every day)


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Tim Truzy info4u profile image

      Tim Truzy 

      22 months ago from U.S.A.

      Thanks, Credence2. No socialist here either. I believe you and I would gladly die for our country. But we believe in fairness. You hit it on the head: the conservatives really want to shut down any access to wealth for the poor, especially, education.

      Without access to the means to gain wealth, the populace can be controlled. It was no wonder Roy Moore made a plea for families to return to a time before the Civil War, when men and women depended on the wealthy plantation owner for survival.

      There is a reason why these right-wing guys hate LBJ, he increased the avenues to wealth and power. minorities and women became more affluent, and the republic enjoyed stability. Barack Obama, signaled to me, that at least, politically, LBJ was successful.

    • Credence2 profile imageAUTHOR


      22 months ago from Florida (Space Coast)

      • Hello, Tim, thanks for reading this article and providing a comment.

      Conservatives spend a great deal of time downplaying the significance of wealth in regards to how and why the system actually works the way it does instead of the way that it should.

      Rush Limbaugh earned his millions from corporate America and conservatives advocating and selling their point of view to the masses as if they actually had objectives in common.

      I always believed that, by definition, it would be the conservatives or rightwingers that would be most intimidated by free access to information by the ‘rabble’.

      It reminds me so much of the dog races, you have to get the dogs to run frantically after a rabbit that they were never meant to catch. After all, we don’t want anyone to ‘think’ too much. This is on the same principles as slave owners not wanting slaves to have the ability to read or write.

      • Yes, capitalism has, at its very foundation, Greed. While, I am not necessarily a socialist, I accommodate the capitalist system only with intense oversight by Government regulators to insure a fair playing field and that matters of public concern that inherently will not be ‘corrected’ as part of the profit motive and the ‘invisible hand of the market’, are always considered. Conservatism has been the equivalent of elitism, maintaining the privileges for the few at the expense of the many.

      The foundation of the ‘Divine Rights of Kings’, there is an order in things and everybody has his or her natural place in the scheme of things and fairness and equality has nothing to do with it.

      Just like the scriptures speak of Jehovah admonishing the Hebrews not to glean the fields, providing for the poor and not being greedy, if capitalists are smart they will leave at least the illusion that the ‘system’ is one of opportunity where anyone can ‘in fact’ win.

      How long would the system last if people believed that there is no viable way of success within it? Those that have the most should have a vested interest in maintenance of the present system.

      Because if people get tired of playing by the rules that work exclusively against them, they will knock over the cookie jar and we will all have to start over. Will the affluent be able to gather the same amount of cookies they had before, would their social status remain under a drastic change?

    • Tim Truzy info4u profile image

      Tim Truzy 

      22 months ago from U.S.A.

      mWe only have to look at the Koch brothers and there towering influence on the Conservative landscape and R. Murdoch to know money plays an important part in politics. It was the conservatives in this group that pushed for the elimination of medica giving both sides of a story. Now, we are hearing "fake news" from all of these outlets.

      One thing which is ignored, a basic principle of economic theory is that man is "greedy." He'll look out for his own, or those like him, especially, concerning wealth. Our founding Fathers wanted to avoid a "royal" group developing in our nation.

      Unfortunately, these guys haven't really studied Marx or even our history thoroughly: oppressed groups rise up and rebel. At least, they should use some common sense: Do they want to "poor" to come and take what they have by force?

      Great article, my friend. Brilliant observations which our elected officials should pay attention, too.

      Isn't it ironic: They still support no gun control.

    • Credence2 profile imageAUTHOR


      7 years ago from Florida (Space Coast)

      Barnsey, thanks for the comment. The days of being a public servent for it own reward has passed. The Founding Fathers, even the ones with the most foresight could not have possibly predicted the influence that money currently has in politics today. I bet that if they did, the Constitution would have written differently to acknowledge the fact that plutocracy is just another form of tyranny.

    • Barnsey profile image


      7 years ago from Happy Hunting Grounds

      Indeed, not class warfare, just elimination of the excess government/old boys network that has been placing their own concerns before those of the country as a whole. With great power comes great responsibility, for the pure of heart. With great power comes corruption and greed for the power hungry wealthy that, honestly, are the only people who can afford higher offices such as the senate, house, Governor, President...well, there you have it. What kind of government requires someone be wealthy in the first place? If they are not wealthy they have to seek out wealthy supporters who will help finance their campaign. That system is counterproductive and too open to human temptation to begin with. Our forefather's must have forgotten the ease at which men fall to their own weaknesses. Time for an updated and clarified constitiution and a new, much smaller, non-pensioned government!

    • Credence2 profile imageAUTHOR


      8 years ago from Florida (Space Coast)

      Thanks, AC, I am glad that the article made sense and hopefully the misunderstanding regarding welath and its possession vs abuse and power can be understood.


    • American_Choices profile image


      8 years ago from USA


      I predicted before the recession, we would have class warfare. Hitler rose to power from economic woes. Sad state. We must stay united and stay focused.

      "We all know of the corrupting influence of money in politics, and to try to deny it is sheer lunacy." - great statement.

      Very well done my friend. Voted up once again! Great hubs!

    • profile image

      Howard Schneider 

      8 years ago from Parsippany, New Jersey

      Welcome to HubPages Credence. You are off to a good start. I look forward to reading more from you.

    • Credence2 profile imageAUTHOR


      8 years ago from Florida (Space Coast)

      HSchneider, as I am the new kid in town, I want to thank you for your favorable acknowledgement of my hub. I did get to your hub profile and found fascinating topics for hubs that you have written. You and I are contemporaries and I look forward to speaking with you and others regarding the issues of the day. I am awkward and want to make certain that I reciprocate properly within this hub universe. Regards, Credence2

    • profile image

      Howard Schneider 

      8 years ago from Parsippany, New Jersey

      You are quite right that money is having a very large and unfair influence on our politicians and their policies. The Citizens United Supreme Court decision gave corporations and the wealthy carte blanche to give any money they want to any candidate with absolutely no disclosure. This is going to make our political system already skewed to the rich, into one completely owned by the rich. This needs to be changed. Very insightful Hub Credence.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)