ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • Social Issues

Of Violence and Violets

Updated on May 4, 2011
randslam profile image

Rand Zacharias is a published freelance writer, author, poet, artist, photographer and all round jack of as many literary trades as he can.

You may not believe it. You may not want to hear it. It is safer to live on planet Earth in the present as opposed to any other time in human existence. It is the best of times and yet, for some, it is still the worst of times.

Edmund Burke

Edmund Burke...a "father of conservatism."
Edmund Burke...a "father of conservatism." | Source

Violent or Violet Culture?

I grew up in central Canada and during the course of my urban education read from books and short stories bearing titles like All Quiet on the Western Front , Slaughterhouse Five, Fahrenheit 491, Catch 22 and many, many more. What lesson was gleaned?

That war and violence are insanity.

After high school out came Apocalypse Now , the movie, adapted from Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, again teaching a young mind about the lunacy of violence...war...man’s inhumanity to man. I believe it was a valuable lesson to learn as early as possible, but some of us have never even dreamed of such a possibility—some hold no hope for the evolution of humankind. For some the idea of a rosy future only bears a bouquet of black dahlias.

These were lessons that I carried into my pacifistic life from the very beginning, being that my parents were begotten themselves in the conscientious cult of the Mennonite—another culture of non-violence. Now, don’t go blowing off with, “What kind of a bleeding heart liberal are you?”

Please, I’ve had my share of violent conflict while playing 35 years in the sport of hockey, growing up in public schools, and should someone accost a friend or family member I would take my three foot wide chest, with accompanying wide jaw, and have a discussion with said accoster who would find himself in a bit of a pinch—if not a punch. I own a 30.06 semi-automatic Remington that has taken down a few deer in its time—but won’t anymore. I don’t back down from a legitimate fight or hunt unless dialogue simply cannot be established. I haven’t found the need to create a violent culture like the news media, political panic button pushers or religious doomsayers. It is a wonderful world when watchful people take care to monitor the untruths of the authors that would rather have conflict.

When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle . Edmund Burke stated in a speech to the English Parliament on April 23, 1770. His context was toward the Whig party, who were rousting bad ideas in an illegal manner, and Burke was urging the Tory party to unite and fight the “bad men” from winning an election. In context Burke was uniting a political party to stand against another political party that was attempting certain persecutions, likely of a monetary nature, upon the people of England.

Ronald Reagan used a variation of the quote when the U. S. Invaded Grenada in the 80’s. Reagan used it to justify military action—violence—when the original quote of good men falling really meant Tory politicians could lose their position of political power. Life and death of a soldier was not at stake—only the position of an elected official. (See more of this misuse of web quotation from Martin Porter at http://tartarus.org/~martin/essays/burkequote2.html)

It is this idea of a culture of violence that is ridiculous in its epic onslaught. When one looks at the last 10,000 years and realizes that these days we live in are the best, and safest, time to be alive that we should shake our heads at the media, the body politic and pathetic prophets of doom. This present time period that we’ve built, been given or enjoy is the safest time during the course of all human history to be alive. It is safer than Cleopatra’s Egypt, Julius Caesar’s Rome and the European era of Renaissance—it is certainly safer than 10,000 BCE or Genghis Khan’s China.

How can I say that?

In a speech given in 2007 by renowned linguist and thinker, Stephen Pinker you can enjoy his interesting repartee of living in our present millennium. It isn’t rose-coloured glasses that I’m wearing trying to reveal a rosy future with silver clouds and golden moons that Pollyanna herself would love to live in—it is simply the factual reality that you are much less likely to be killed by violence in the 21st century than when compared to all of past human histories. Isn’t that encouraging? How’s that in attempting to make your day—week—or maybe, your year?

For all of you naysayers or theologians who pray for the soon coming return of Jesus Christ or the continuing myth of our violent planet? Christ was reported to have returned a second time, wasn’t he? Didn’t he say, “The kingdom of God is at hand.” Isn’t the kingdom of heaven in your hearts? Humanity has become more empathetic, bearing more “circles of reciprocity” and realizing the need for symbiotic and cooperative relationships globally, socially and locally.

As Pinker states at the end of his presentation after revealing this myth of violence, “It would be nice to know what it is.” Even the specialists can’t explain this continued drop in human violence.

So even though Hollywood keeps pumping out violent movies of ever-increasing ferocity, it would appear that the statistics of humankind in relation to homicide over the course of recorded history are revealing a kinder and gentler species.

Our past violent nature has been educated and not violated—but violetted. Perhaps the flower children of the 60’s aren’t all pushing up daisies, but rather, they set the table for a floral future of epic advances.


Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • randslam profile image
      Author

      Rand Zacharias 5 years ago from Kelowna, British Columbia

      Amen, Chuck, Amen...hate the religion...not the sinner...lol...like there are any.

    • Chuck Field profile image

      Chuck Field 5 years ago

      Well... great stuff! You know me well enough now that it shouldn't surprise you when I say that I think we are evolving out of the need for religions. The easiest justification to harm others is a difference in religious beliefs. It has been the case for most violence, since the beginning of recorded history. As we evolve from the myths, I think we will find it harder and harder to kill or do any evil in the name of "our" God. From my point of view, we can't evolve fast enough.

    • randslam profile image
      Author

      Rand Zacharias 5 years ago from Kelowna, British Columbia

      Thanks, Sooner. The sad fact for our news outlets remains the need for drama...usually the most extreme type of drama. The ability to bring destructive news instead of constructive information to the masses just doesn't seem to be in their wheel house.

      Humanity becomes more civilized, yet those with the greatest opportunity to inform instead of deform are missing the mark.

    • profile image

      Sooner28 5 years ago

      You know, you bring up a really good point about the media focusing on crime when it is actually DOWN historically. Me and my siblings love to watch our local news channel, and count how many "scary" stories they air in one 30 minute period. Yesterday, there was a case of a teacher being attacked by a parent, a fire, and a repeat drug offender being arrested again. I guess "if it bleeds, it leads" as the saying goes. Voted up.

    • randslam profile image
      Author

      Rand Zacharias 6 years ago from Kelowna, British Columbia

      Each has a right to his or her opinion. If you believe the media isn't causing the focus on violence and creating the promulgation of much of the violence in our culture--you've stated your opinion.

      If you're talking about domestic violence, well that's different than my topic, but I hope you got a chance to think about the real violence human history has seen--and how on a percentage basis--we are seeing less for the size of population that now occupies our planet.

    • platinumOwl4 profile image

      platinumOwl4 6 years ago

      Yes, it is violent, but the unseen violence is the worst. People have not and probably will not know of it unless they investigate for themselves. The media in some instances will not bring it to the forefront.

    • randslam profile image
      Author

      Rand Zacharias 6 years ago from Kelowna, British Columbia

      Welcome to HubPages, htodd--glad you liked this reversal on a theme that the media keeps blowing out of proportion.

    • htodd profile image

      htodd 6 years ago from United States

      Great info..Thanks for sharing

    • randslam profile image
      Author

      Rand Zacharias 6 years ago from Kelowna, British Columbia

      The reason people don't write about this, or make movies about this, is easy to see. It's just not very exciting.

      Perhaps as we see more and more of the injuries created by the atrocities of war, after the Iraq debacle and the invasion of Afghanistan, returning home with soldiers who are willing to speak out against the insanity of violence a change of heart will be introduced, but I wouldn't put money on it.

    • profile image

      jules 7 years ago

      I am so glad to see people writing about this! The reason we think these are the most violent times is because we KNOW about every violent thing that happens all over the world because of our modern media/communication abilities. People didn't know of everything that was happening to people around the world like we do now. We think it is more violent because we see it all--in the older days, they did not see it all.