Managing Labor, and Political Gain, Social Changes
Managing Humans At Work Via PoliticsClick thumbnail to view full-size
Politics Influence Job Stability
How does one manage human politics whether social or in the workplace?
The easy answer... By tyranny, force, brainwashing and terror.
History has shown time and again, that a person or entity is able to grab hold of an entire people, first in body, mind and soul.
Humans in many job or career situations are ruled by the politics or political sway of their CEO's and other owners.
Political expression on the job is usually frowned on, and can bring a damper, or violence into social situations.
Keeping the human being shut down, bound by fear and rules, may keep them silenced and under heavy prohibitions; this is one way to manage people, but it is impossible to keep the Human spirit down.
MOOC I The Free Labor Ideology I Civil War & The Reconstruction 1850-1861
Managing The Politics of People
The true answer: Managing the politics of human beings, is like trying to build a dam with sponges.
Many workplaces in North America have stringent policies about discussing politics, and religion in the workplace. There are also clear rules and boundaries laid out regarding the limits of personal human interactions.
In most workplaces in the United States of America, there are clear guidelines in place regarding topics that stir human emotions to a fever pitch. Managers have learned that emotional topics are best left for places suited to that activity.
A place of employment is not a place to push personal political positions, nor is it a place for proselytizing. Work is a place to exchange energy, talents, and skills for an agreed amount of filthy lucre or wages.
North America - Shift of Social Norms
Social settings are always evolving. It seems the evolution of social rules and boundaries in dealing with personal and public intercourse have been rapid from 2002 - Today
In North America, in the United States in the last 12 years we have seen a different trend in social settings. It is becoming chic to be rude, intrusive, and interlope within other's relationships and space that was once limited by some social niceties.
It seems as if Social Settings seem to be a good a place as any for politicians and political ideals to be blasted; one side against the other.
Ideas or Solutions
- This may be an excellent time for debate halls
- Join or encourage membership in Toastmasters.
- Provide more areas for oration, provide settings to allow enemies to think, consider, and remember they are being graded by an audience
- Cover topics such as: Communication,
- Research ,
- Consistency and Validity
- Contrast & Comparison
- It is important for thinking humans to take the opposite position.
- Make people more responsible for their words and / or actions, hopefully causing people to consider others, or their own consequences.
Another helpful suggestion is that the majority of humans, who are not bad actors, and who do not as a habit behave violently or in a rude manner, not accept, support or promote bad behavior actors..
Do not allow by doing nothing or pretending it is not happening: "That is just the way they are...". No more okays for intrusive, insensitive and people being mean, nor get away with it.
This type of bad behavior is not acceptable in a kind and careful society.
China has attempted to manage the politics of Tibetan Monks for many years
The United States Government has attempted to manage the social, economical and politics of the Native Tribes of Turtle Island for many years
Moses will be considered a Founding Father of the U.S. per Texas School Text
What A Shift
A shift in our society that I have witnessed the past two years is regarding the ACA or Obamacare. Here in the South, there has been an unnatural push to convince the poorest people to vote against and act against their best interests.
There are hundreds of individuals begging and pleading for help with medical bills, and those people are generally eligible for free or very low health insurance coverage. They will not have anything to do with it, because in some cases the individual will be at odds with their employers, church membership or community if they accept Affordable Care.