ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Legislating Morality: Laws Are Meant to Protect Us from Others

Updated on August 31, 2012

Laws Are Supposed to Protect Us from Others

Without getting into specifics as to drugs or drug statistics, I believe we can still have a discourse about the constitutionality of making crimes out of things that people do to themselves. Just for a moment or two, cast away your personal feelings about drug abuse, because personal feelings aside, because there is no legitimate reason to incarcerate by the thousands people who have been convicted of using drugs.

These laws have stemmed from moral beliefs, but our government was never intended to prosecute or persecute people on the basis of morality. Isn't that why there was a revolution between the British and the colonists?

We can prohibit actions in the workplace, while behind the wheel of a car and other situations where another person or persons safety could be at risk, but do we have the right to dictate what people do in their own homes?

If you think that isn't happening, consider urine drug screens. Suppose a person indulges only on the weekend when s/he is off work and home. Monday morning that person is no longer mentally or physically impaired, but if a urine drug screen was performed there's a likelihood that a drug or drugs would be revealed. The unimpaired person is likely out of a job for flunking a drug screen.

Legalize Drugs?


History Is Our Greatest Teacher

The United States has already waged war on another mild-altering substance, namely alcohol. Prohibition was a disaster, creating an empire for mobsters and bootleggers. The war on drugs is no different.

While my main concern is the use of laws to dictate morality, the legalization of drugs is also worth consideration. If drugs were legalized and handled properly by the government (is that possible?), an empire just as profitable as alcohol ever was would be crumbled. Take away the profit in drug dealing and who wants to do it any longer?

Gang violence would decrease and drug dealers would no longer haunt neighborhoods. Prisons would again have capacity, meaning no new prisons would be necessary. There would be a reduced need for parole and probation officers or correctional staff. Court dockets would no longer be overflowing.

And all of these positives for the community and tax payers? Make no mistake, crime control is big business. Don't think that everyone who opposes legalization of drugs does so on a moral basis; it is the bottom line--their bottom line--that is at stake.

It is a fact that the United States has more people incarcerated per capita than any other developed nation. Take the time to find out how many of those in prison are there for drug use offenses. You will be astounded.

I don't see the current legal system changing any time soon as far as drug use and incarceration goes, but it needs to. I'd like to believe that the Supreme Court would cut down a law that allows a drug user to be arrested, but my hopes are dim here also. It won't be until people such as you and me take a long hard look at this situation and make our thoughts known that change will occur.

Obama Declares Decriminalization of Drugs a Topic Worthy of Debate

Minding My Own Business Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • L.L. Woodard profile image

      L.L. Woodard 7 years ago from Oklahoma City

      abbykorinnelee, I've seen the same thing with potential employees and co-workers. Now, if these people were impaired on the job, that would be something else. But a positive urine screen only proves past use of many of the drugs, especially marijuana.

    • abbykorinnelee profile image

      Abigayle Malchow 7 years ago from Ripon Wisconsin

      I have been believing the same thing for many years now. I have had some of the best employees that were let go due to not passing a urine test and they were impossible to replace.

    • L.L. Woodard profile image

      L.L. Woodard 7 years ago from Oklahoma City

      Thanks for joining in Jess_C. I have less trouble with the punishments for drug sellers, but I maintain that locking people up for what they do do themselves is ridiculous and should be illegal.

    • Jess_C profile image

      Jess_C 7 years ago

      Often times drug abusers and sellers incur harsher punishments then those who are convicted of much greater crimes that involve the harming of others or others property. It is sad when we punish people more for hurting themselves then we do when they effect the well being of others.

    • L.L. Woodard profile image

      L.L. Woodard 7 years ago from Oklahoma City

      Thanks for the comment, multimastery. Jails and prisons are big business in the U.S.

    • profile image

      multimastery 7 years ago

      Yes I agree some minor drug related situations are too extreme. Jails & prisons are too overcrowded to send people there for a petty or one-time offense.