ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Turning Business into "Agent of Change" In The Lives of Poor

Updated on October 27, 2018
Goodpal profile image

Goodpal is a keep reader. He is specially interested in topics like poverty, population, climate change, solar power etc.

Why are you so rich when I am poor?
Why are you so rich when I am poor? | Source

Poverty is Not a Human Way of Life

Poverty is a global problem, although it is more glaring in the world outside the Western hemisphere. It is weird that even the richest country US that can wage endless multi trillion dollar wars has plenty of poverty and homelessness. Given the abundance of natural as well as man made wealth poverty should not exist. But over half a billion people survive within $1.90-a-day; they have been labelled “extremely poor” by the World Bank. On the threshold like $3-a-day, several billion people would get the privilege of having the "poor" tag! Poverty persists today because it has been taken as 'normal' and 'unavoidable' by development planners around the world.

Over 1 Billion People Live below $1.25-a-day poverty line.
Over 1 Billion People Live below $1.25-a-day poverty line.

Rising Income Inequality should be a Global Concern

Today just 1% of the humanity owns more wealth than what is owned by rest of the 99%. This gap is increasing with time. It is a widely known fact that GDP growth only concentrates wealth in the hands of the rich and the poor stay where they are - in poverty! While the global leaders remain ever obsessed with economy; eliminating rising inequality is not their concern. They are happy spending billions and trillions on military research and killing machines but when it comes to poverty or climate change their pockets go empty and brains stop functioning.

Unjust Rules of the Business World

If poverty has not disappeared from the rich West despite their awe inspiring accumulation of wealth during the colonial period and massive industrialization, only one conclusion can be drawn – unjust rules of their capital markets.

Clearly, capitalism as practiced today evades the poor because its rules are set in favour of the rich – people with capital. The popular shareholder capitalism works to create wealth only for those who put money in the business – to the exclusion of everyone else, even the employees who must be paid the least to generate maximum profit. This possessive capitalism has created its own rules that make a few rich richer and the rest stay where they are.

The only role poor people have in today’s economic setup is as labor force – cheap labor force, to be more precise – because it makes the products of companies cheap and increase their profitability. In this sense having poverty helps the business owners; without cheap labor their products and services will not be competitive.

As businesses grow bigger they begin to influence governments to create policies in their favour. As a result common and poor people suffer. Even the traditional business wisdom of creating sustainable wealth for the future has little relevance. Today, the focus is on short term profits, this immediate maximization of profits overshadows long term wealth creation. As a result, we see an ugly race for immediate profit in the business world as if there is no tomorrow. And, ironically, they are right – climate change and global warming are staring at the face!

As a result, although capitalism is responsible for brilliant innovations and prosperity in the lives of people in societies where it flourished (North America and Western Europe), it has failed to touch the lives of the vast majority of humanity that survives below just 2-3 dollars a day. Some time ago Bill Gates suggested refining current capitalism to give it a more human face.

What do you think?

Will Capitalists and Corporate World Ever Address the Problem of Global Poverty?

See results

Business Rules can be Changed to Favor the Poor

All the skills of the business world can be easily applied to achieve social goals rather than maximizing monetary profits for a few rich elites. This is the idea behind using business as tool to eliminate poverty. The current “profit maximizing” business enterprise see the poor as mere cheap labor resource. It pays them the least and evades government rules that require additional benefits in order to maximize its profits.

This stereotype can be changed and it is quite possible for a business enterprise to have goal other than “profit maximization.” It can adopt the goal of “maximizing social impact.” Such a “social business” entity will still be earning profit to cover its costs, and if possible, generate a small surplus to grow the business. Its owners would limit themselves to recovering only their initial investment but continue to run the business so that it has the maximum impact on its targeted social cause. A social business is not a charity; it is a non-loss and non-dividend company with a social objective.

Such a social enterprise, however, would operate like any other business entity except that its goal is to serve some social cause. This, for example, could be related to health, education, sanitation, environmental, etc. Some common areas where social businesses can intervene are medical services for the poor, constructing houses for the low income groups, education centers for the poor, low cost nutritional food supplements for the poor, and so on.

Clearly, only a special group of people passionate about social issues and helping people can run a social business successfully. Investors of a social business come with a philanthropic heart, not with profit motives.

Given the will and enthusiastic entrepreneurs, there are numerous ways in which social businesses can serve the social causes. They can coexist with the usual business enterprises that strive to maximize their profits. There is no conflict, the two types of business entities can work towards their separate goals independently.

“Social Businesses” are Better Than Charities

Philanthropy, charity and welfare is fine for short term problems or emergencies but they are rarely designed for permanent eradication of poverty. A charitable dollar can be used only once, but a dollar invested in a self-sustaining social business is recycled endlessly. Since they operate on self generated profits they don’t have to consider the wishes and idiosyncrasies of the donors, and work with focus.

Capacity building is the most sustainable anti-poverty strategy.
Capacity building is the most sustainable anti-poverty strategy.

Social Entrepreneurship

The Poor Can Themselves Eliminate Poverty, If They Are Allowed To!!

This is the bold assertion of Bangladeshi Nobel Peace Prize Winner Professor Muhammad Yunus and founder of the Grameen Bank which has become almost synonymous with the idea of microcredit throughout the world. He certainly has reasons for the confidence in his assertion. He has worked extensively throughout his life with poor people. He knows that they are not devoid of abilities and potential; what is missing is the environment and system to channelize their enterprise.

The Poor are “Credit Worthy”

It is ironic that the banking and financial sector excludes those who need money the most – the poor. Throughout the world banks serve only those who are already rich and shirk those who lack it.

It is precisely here that Dr Yunus wanted to make a difference – by extending credit to the poor so that they can setup small businesses and grow on their strength. This idea also appeals from a humanitarian angle: it is more dignified to have a personal business that produces moderate income than chasing wages at the terms dictated by others. An additional advantage of personal business is that it also absorbs family members that helps both in operation and expansion.

Professor Yunus popularized microcredit as an effective anti- poverty tool across the world. Through these small, collateral-free loans with a nearly 100 percent return rate millions of borrowers – mostly women – have been able to harness entrepreneurial abilities inherent in them.

Examples of Social Businesses

The Grameen Bank founded by Prof. Yunus is an ideal example of a social business that seeks to maximize the benefits of the borrowers and is owned by them.

The Grameen Danone Foods is another well known example of social business. It manufactures nutrient-rich, fortified yogurt in small local plants that minimize the need for expensive refrigeration and transportation so that it can be sold at a low price to improve the diets of rural children in Bangladesh.

By investing in this venture, Groupe Danone helps eliminate malnutrition in Bangladesh - a more sustainable alternative than merely donating money or yogurt. It is a beautiful role model for other large companies to follow instead of taking the charity route.

Social Entrepreneurship

Doing Well By Doing Good!

When we move beyond traditional orthodoxy, the poor become “credit worthy” and business can also exist for purposes other than maximizing profits of the investors!

The urge to do good exists in all human-beings, alongside the self-interest. It can be harnessed and combined with the ingenuity of the capitalism and human enterprise to help the world's poor become self-supported. There are plenty of capable people in the world who are highly motivated to solve social problems; we need to provide them the environment so that they can make the world a better place for the poor humanity.

Capitalism is a time tested tool to help entrepreneurs. Even the poor can be motivated to turn into entrepreneurs and take care of their own lives. They are “bankable” as prof Yunus has already proved. What is required is to sustain and grow the initiative of social businesses and social enterprises alongside helping the poor start microenterprises through microcredit.

Share Your Views

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • stanfrommarietta profile image


      6 years ago

      Steve Keen and Yves Smith make the case that a lot of this in the economics realm is due to the neo-classical economics, which is the received view in the universities. It's sort of like the universities in Galileo's time, where the Ptolemaic system was the received view, and you could get yourself fired for critiicizing it: Leave things alone. It will correct itself and return us to equilibrium. They taught astrology back in the universities of Galileo's time, no? That's a better analogy.

    • Goodpal profile imageAUTHOR


      6 years ago

      Thanks Junko and Stan for the stimulating debate here.

      Some basic factors we fail to discuss are falling standards of ethics, morality and justice in the modern society. It distorts capitalism into a "possessive capitalism" and turns governance into a tug-of-war between vested interests of those already rich or powerful.

    • junko profile image


      6 years ago

      Stan, we actually agree more than you may have notice in my comment to you. I also agree with your stance against Austerity.

    • stanfrommarietta profile image


      6 years ago

      We actually don't disagree. However, the government does supply services. Ever go to a National Park? Ever use Medicare (maybe you aren't old enough, but if you get the ACA insurance, you will be getting a service (the regulation of private health insurance companies for the general welfare (as it says in the preamble of the Constitution). Ever drive on the interstate? or national highways? Ever see the Hoover Dam or the Grand Coulee dam in Washington? That was to provide a "good" (electricity) to a region that was at the time a wilderness with a few cities scattered throughout. Without the Grand Coulee Dam we would not have been able to win the second world war, because it provide the electric power for the aviation industry to build the bombers and fighters, for the shipbuilding industry to build ships of war, and most important of all to develop the atom bomb that eventually stopped the war with Japan. After the war those industries were converted to private manufacture, but they had the electricity to run their factories. And it also supported the new towns that grew up in the West around the expansion of these industries.

      But when the national government builds infrastructure and supports key jobs like those in public safety and teaching, it creates consumers who will demand the goods private businesses can provide. Right now, there is not enough money circulating to maintain full employment and full production. We cannot save our way to economic growth. Money first has to be supplied for people to save and spend. And it gets supplied in deficit spending on infrastructure and these public services mentioned above. That's how you jump start a stalled economy when not enough money is circulating to support full production and employment. Your federal government has to create the new money and spend it into the economy via programs on infrastructure and public services. The states cannot create their own money. When they are stalled, the Federal government has to come in and help the system start moving again by providing funds for various public benefits and projects. Those funds create jobs in the private sector that would not be there save for the government spending. Europe lacks a strong central government with sovereignty over the money supply (of Euros). The countries in the European Union are like the states without a central government concerned for their general welfare. In the end the prosperous states end up dominating the economy while the other states decline into abject poverty. But we have a Central government with powers to serve the general welfare, and we will not become like Greece if we allow our government to use those powers.

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      @ Stan: The Government Don't supply Goods. The Private sector supplys goods and service for profit. The Government supplys service and infrasturture so the private sector can profit. The government isn't operated like a business, it is supported by fees and taxes to build and maintain infrastructure and service to the American people.

    • Goodpal profile imageAUTHOR


      6 years ago

      Thanks junko, for sharing your thoughts.

      Social enterprises are like any other business entity. The only thing that sets them apart is the goal. Their owners are driven by serving some social cause, rather than maximizing profits for themselves. Certainly there are people who are motivated by things other than monetary profits. How about a scientist who has a technical patent and wants to set up some industry based on this knowledge. Once his business stabilize, it continues to generate profits but he decides to expand towards further research on other ideas he has. He is happy; he doesn't have to run for grants to carry on researching his ideas. At the same time, he is financially self sufficient and in a position to make efforts to discover more new things. Needless to say, his colleagues and employees are also learning along the way.

      Cooperatives are other well-known examples; they do wonders for craftsmen and artisans as well as in the farming sector.

      I have a slight problem with getting attached to "isms" whether it is "capitalism" or "socialism". I strongly believe that any ideology is only as good as people following it!

      The idea of having "social enterprises" in the so-called capitalistic society is fairly OK! It has nothing to do "socialism". Businesses that "maximize profits" and those that "maximize impact on some social cause" can coexist without any problem. They are not mutually exclusive. Both run on human skills and efficiency in the same way.

      Government's primary responsibility is to "govern" through policies that discriminate against none. I am convinced that problem starts when some strong groups with vested interests starts influencing the state policies; it invites corruptions of all manners. Accountability and transparency go down the drain. And who suffers the most? The poor and ordinary people.

      Finally, I think the elements of justice, accountability and transparency both in the private enterprises and government activities are more important than debating the text book concepts of different "isms".

      I am always delighted by thoughtful comments. Thank you very much.

    • stanfrommarietta profile image


      6 years ago

      Governments like ours were not created to make profits. The government provides goods and services for the general good at cost. That's why you can't run the government like a business.

    • junko profile image


      6 years ago

      The West is developed Financially with access to education transportation in the infrastructure to support capitalism. Their are millions of poor and unemployed and uneducated in the US and Europe. I agree if social capitalism was practice in the west it can reduce poverty and change the lives of the poor in the developed world. Charity begins a home and spread abroad, in the United States traditional capitalist are at war with any form of socialism. They consider the poor, and needy, 47%er's that want to redistribute their wealth. Income Inequality in the US is a clear and present danger to fighting poverty worldwide since the US is considered the leader of the developed world. Socialism is as much a part of Americanism as capitalism. Outstanding Hub.

    • Goodpal profile imageAUTHOR


      6 years ago

      Thanks Mark and Mat, for reading and sharing.

      I am certainly aware of various manners of stakeholder approaches; they in fact point to the right direction we should be heading to. But we get stuck with cliches like "maximizing profits for the shareholders", "trickle down economy" and so on. Another missing piece of wisdom in today's business is "long term wealth creation" - this itself has the potential to take us towards "sustainable" development.

      I hope poverty and global climate mess do not remain problems for research only, forever. We need to get serious about problems that pose danger to human-beings or make their lives miserable. Whether capitalism or scientific research, both should solve real life problems of the humanity as whole. People's lives are more important than ossified theories which deny benefits to certain segment of the humanity.

      Everything will fall in line if we devise a strategy to make capitalism responsible for everybody - employees, society and environment. Capital does not exist only in the bank accounts of a few. What stops us from calling employees skills and labor capital, society's contribution capital and natural resources capital and be responsible for their healths?

      More than research we need to challenge the rigid traditional orthodoxy that has limited our sphere of ideas and thinking. However, the human development approach of the UNDP and Amartya Sen's capability approaches to development offer hope of positive change. They have the potential to revolutionize the whole world by making development revolve around people and maximizing their well-being, rather than maximizing cash in a few bank accounts.

    • Mathewson profile image

      Andro Mathewson 

      6 years ago from Germany

      Great Hub!

    • Mark Lees profile image

      Mark Lees 

      6 years ago

      A very interesting hub. Voted up.

      You might want to read Freman's ideas of a stakeholder approach to business management as a bridging step between traditional capitalism and social capitalism.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)