ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • United States Politics

President Trump has issued an immigration ban, not a Muslim ban

Updated on January 31, 2017
RJ Schwartz profile image

I'm on the right side of politics and enjoy a good debate on government, the economy, and the rights of the people.

President Trump, demonstrating his strong national security vision, recently imposed a ban on immigration from seven nations. Through Executive Order, President Trump effectively restricted entry into the United States by any citizens of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The Order also suspended all refugee resettlement for 120 days and barred Syrian refugees indefinitely. The Order was implemented to protect the United States and its citizens from foreign nationals who intend to commit terrorist attacks in the United States. Although unpopular at the moment, mainly due to media aggrandizement, the action is one hundred percent legal under United States law. This temporary ban will also allow the Trump Administration needed time to implement a proper vetting process, which will stop foreign terrorists from coming to America.

President Obama Actually Gave Trump the List

The short list of seven countries whose citizens are temporarily banned from entering the United States is based on a bill that Obama signed into law in December 2015. President Trump used that law to formulate his Executive Order. The Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act was part of an omnibus spending bill. The bipartisan bill passed through Congress with little pushback from either Democrats or Republicans. The Obama Administration restricted visa waivers for those seven countries. President Trump has taken it one step further and temporarily halted immigration and visitors from the same list of countries. There are conversations that other nations may be added to this list in the future.

The Pen and the Phone

It seems that every action President Trump takes has been made into a media talking point; from his Cabinet picks, to his firm stance on Trade policies, and his empowerment of the Border Patrol. His methods are also being scrutinized, despite their legality. His use of Executive Orders is a top topic in the news, with the media trying to make it seem like he's using them excessively. In fact, just the opposite is true, President Trump has signed fewer Executive Orders at this point in his Presidency than President Obama did. It's not unusual for an incoming President to immediately implement key platform topics, and President Trump is no different than any of his predecessors. One difference between Trump and Obama is that President Trump signs his Orders publically, while former President Obama did many in secret.

Muslims Across the World

Opponents of President Trumps' policies are claiming this Order is an outright Muslim ban, yet the facts tell a different story; facts which the media are struggling to dance around in order to continue their smear campaign against the president. Surely the second largest region on earth won't be banned in America, but the press fails to demonstrate that these seven terrorist nations are small in the larger picture. Pakistan with nearly 180 million Muslims, Indonesia with about 205 million, India with 172 million, and Bangladesh with over 145 million are home to some of the worlds largest Muslim populations. Yet, none of these nations are being banned. Nor are other nations in the vicinity geographically of them; Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Kuwait, and Israel all support Muslim populations. Trump's ban is to temporarily stop the flow of terrorists trying to infiltrate America while posing as refugees or immigrants.

Conflict of Interest Witch Hunt

Many people on the opposite side of the debate are publically asking why nations that were involved in the 9-11 terrorist attacks on U.S. soil weren't part of the list. Saudi Arabia and Lebanon were both tied to the hijackers, yet neither nation made the list. Conspiracy theorists, still trying to connect President Trumps' previous business dealings with his current position, cite past investments the President had in Egypt and Dubai and have tried to spin them as "protectionism" of those countries. The attacks on Trump's billionaire status are expected to continue, but what's apparent is the lack of any real evidence to support these nonsensical claims. President Trump has already stepped down from his leadership positions in his holding companies.

Reactions Abroad

The European Union and the elitist membership of many of the ruling families of Europe have condemned the actions of President Trump, as expected. They are also trying to paint President Trump's actions as racist or anti-Muslim. Yet, all the opposition candidates in many of the European nations which are being overrun by criminal refugees are in full support. The seven nations that are on the list had mixed reactions. Most feigned insult and forecasted retaliation for his actions. Other nations ganged up on the President and doubled down on globalism and open-borders. Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau made his position known via social media, when he tweeted Canada was open to accept all refugees. German Chancellor Merkel, with her own open-arms policies severely hurting Germany, and British Prime Minister May, both had lukewarm responses; trying to stay on the political fence for the moment.

So What Now?

Despite the number of objectors, the Executive Order is being executed. The ban is in place and anyone in government who tries to fight it will be relieved of their job. Sally Yates, an Obama holdover, was removed as temporary Attorney General for failing to do her job. She chose to make a political statement against the policy, even though it was legal, so President Trump removed her from office. More may be following her if they choose to act in a manner that goes against the policies of the administration. We can also expect mountains of legal challenges against the Order, attempting to show that it's targeting Muslims. The press will continue to mount smear campaigns against the President, but those who voted for him are quietly praising the man for actually following through on his promise of keeping America safe.

Comments

Submit a Comment

  • RJ Schwartz profile image
    Author

    Ralph Schwartz 9 months ago from Idaho Falls, Idaho

    This EO has been called many things including unconstitutional, illegal, immoral, and absurd...YET, no one has been able to give actual reasons why. The influence of George Soros on the Democratic Party is on full display as the Party-puppets act out and cry wolf time and time again on the news...but there isn't anything to cry about.

  • profile image

    Old Poolman 9 months ago

    Did anyone see where they arrested a wanted terrorist at JFK today? He was coming into the country on a tourist visa supposedly to visit family and to to the Super Bowl.

    Seems like the enhanced security is working.

  • fpherj48 profile image

    Paula 9 months ago from Beautiful Upstate New York

    Awwww Fiddledeesticks! It wouldn't matter if the press printed 100% undeniable truth...fact...with pictures, proof, audio, evidence & DNA sworn statements & full disclosures. What is crystal clear here is that when you're in deep denial, stuck on stupid and stubborn to a lethal degree....It is a complete waste of precious time & energy. Que sera, sera.

  • breakfastpop profile image

    breakfastpop 9 months ago

    Lying is now acceptable. There should be consequences for those that purposely distort the truth. Now Obama has officially jumped into the mess, and shame on him. I can only suppose he is anxious to divide the nation even more. That is what I call disgusting.

  • Dont Taze Me Bro profile image

    Banned cause of pissants promisem and deantraylor 9 months ago from TWO OF THE MANY LYING LIB CRYBABIES OF HUB PAGES

    What the media is doing with this, a TEMPORARY ban to strengthen our vetting processes and make the country more secure, demonstrates just how much they are out of touch with reality and I swear is losing them more and more audience by the day. The frowning and childish body language of the news people reporting on this makes them look like insolent pouting children and no one really thinks a temporary ban can be a bad thing. I f Obama was doing it, and he has in the past, they wouldn't even be reporting on it let alone digging up anyone who wants to complain that it has made their life a hell and putting them on air. The spin they broadcast about this is so sophomoric and the more they do this the less people will put stock in anything the MSM says about Trump. They're putting the nails in their own coffin every time they speak. The MSM can't thrive with only an audience of mind numbed dupes who buy into their spin and that is where they are taking it.

  • profile image

    skepticalindian 9 months ago

    Its temporary ban, 120 days.

  • profile image

    Old Poolman 9 months ago

    I read a comment that said, "I lock my doors at night not because I don't like the people outside, but because I love the people inside."

    It is the medias failure to tell the people this ban is nothing new and has been done before. Even their beloved Obama placed a temporary ban on refugees.

    I'm betting many European countries are wishing their leaders had the guts to do the same thing Trump is doing. But for them it is too late to undo the damage that has been done.

    I respect Trump for doing this, but the media and the liberals are either hiding or unaware of the truth about temporary bans.

    Great hub by the way.