ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Snippets From "FEAR: Trump in the White House" for Those Who Don't Have Time to Read. [Chapters 3 and 4]

Updated on October 20, 2018
My Esoteric profile image

ME has spent most of his retirement from service to the United States studying, thinking, and writing about the country he served.

Steve Bannon - Trump's Chief Strategist

by Gage_Skidmore
by Gage_Skidmore | Source

Continuation

This is the second of a series of in-depth looks into Bob Woodward's new book Fear. The first article considered chapters 1 and 2. This article will begin with chapter 3.


Chapter 3 - Bannon's First Look at The Trump Campaign

"Where the f--k is everybody?" says Steve Bannon after walking into the Trump campaign operations center in Trump Tower 85 days before the presidential election..

When he walked into the war room, the hub of all of the campaign activity, the rapid response center, he found - one person, Andy Surabian. In response to Bannon's rude question, Surabian answers "I don't know. This is like it is on every Sunday."

Bannon is stunned. "This is the campaign headquarters", "I mean like the place where the whole thing's run out of?" Surabian answered "yeah" to both questions. The conversation deteriorates. "Where the f--k is Jared?" (Bannon heard that Jared and Ivanka were the brains behind the operation.) Jared, of course, was not there either but "were on entertainment mogul and Democratic donor David Geffen's $300 million yacht - one of the largest in the world - off the coast of Croatia, on vacation with Wendi Deng, a business woman and former wife of Rupert Murdoch." And so went Steve Bannon's introduction to how Trump runs his campaign.

Trump Doesn't Like Surprises - Goodbye Paul Manafort

While there, Bannon gets a call from Paul Manafort and is asked to join him in his residence in Trump Tower that Trump set up for him. Bannon does. Manafort starts off with "Listen, everybody tells me your really know the media." Bannon sort of agrees by saying "I run a right-wing website. I know advocacy." Well, Manafort had something for Bannon to look at.

It was a draft of a New York Times story headlined: "Secret Ledger in Ukraine Lists Cash for Donald Trump's Campaign Chief." where Bannon read, "Handwritten ledgers show $12.7 million in undisclosed cash payments designated for Mr. Manafort." from the pro-Russian political party. Bomb shell !!.1

"When is this coming out?" Bannon wants to know. "It may go up tonight." was the response. "Does Trump know anything about this?" Bannon now asks. "No" is the answer.

"You've got to call Trump ... go see him face-to-face. If this comes out in the paper, and he doesn't know about it, it's lights out for you. How do you even take $12.7 million in cash?"

"It's all lies," says Manafort, "I had expenses." and then says he didn't take but $500,000 of the $12.7 million.

Bottom line, Trump wasn't told, the story came out, and good-bye Paul Manafort.



1 I remember this and is where Special Counsel Robert Mueller (once he was appointed) began construction his case against Paul Manafort that ultimately led to his conviction in one trial and a guilty pleas in a second trail. Part of the plea deal was Manafort's cooperation with the Russia investigators.

Reince Priebus and the RNC

Unlike the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Republican National Committee (RNC) had been spending their time, under Priebus, building out and modernizing their organization.1 Where the DNC made much use of data-driven information and social media to help Obama get elected twice, the RNC didn't. Priebus meant to correct that and he did with a vengeance.

Trump had no organization, period. Priebus knew that the Donald could not win without him and the RNC, even if Trump didn't know it himself. The purpose of the RNC, just like the DNC is for Democrats, is to get Republicans elected. So, even though Trump had greatly and repeatedly abused the RNC in general and Priebus specifically with claims like calling the RNC a "disgrace" and a "scam" and that Priebus "should be ashamed of himself", Priebus held his nose and pushed on. As Woodward wrote, "the RNC was effectively the Trump campaign staff."

One thing Priebus tried to do was move Trump away from the volatile, bombastic, Steve Bannon. As much as Trump was beholden to the RNC for his success, we would not listen. Woodward reports:

"...on August 12, the New York Times reported, "Trump decision to make Stephen K. Bannon, chairman of Breitbart News website, his campaign chief executive was a defiant rejection of efforts by longtime Republican hands to wean him from the bombast and racially charged speech that helped propel him to the nomination but now threatens his candidacy. ... For Mr. Trump, though, bringing in Mr. Bannon was the political equivalent of ordering comfort food."

Bannon noted later that "I realized I'm the director, he's the actor." (I don't think it actually worked out that way, however.)

Hitting nail on the head

Kellyanne Conway went to the Democratic convention in July. She listened to the speeches and listened to the people there. The Democratic message she observed was "... Donald Trump is bad, and we're not Donald Trump. The rest of the message was race, gender, LGBT." But from some of the people there, she heard:

  • "God, my daddy, my granddaddy, and I are all in the union. I'm going to vote for Donald Trump?" - they did.
  • I'm going to vote for a billionaire Republican?" - they did.
  • and women would say, "... you know, I'm pro-choice ... but I don't think Roe v Wade is going to change. But I don't understand why we can't afford everyday life anymore, so I'm voting on that." (meaning they are going to vote for Trump. - they did.

From this, Conway coined the term "the hidden Trump voter." This wasn't a term the media and the Clinton campaign did buy; much to their chagrin as it turned out. Who did buy it? Reince Priebus, Katy Walsh (and her analytics database) and the RNC. Conway also discovered that "There's not a single hidden Hillary voter in the entire country. They're all out and about." About Clinton, she says, "She doesn't seem to have a message. Now if I'm her, I'm going to find a message. I'm going to buy a message. And it's going to be very positive and uplifting and optimistic. All I can see from her so far is not optimism."

Based on this, and the fact that Hillary hadn't "cracked 50% in eight key states that Obama had won twice with over 50 percent." The consensus between her and Bannon is IF Trump can make the race about Hillary he will win; if he can't he loses. He did, with the help of the Russians, Wikileaks, and, for that matter, Hillary Clinton - and he won. Conway hit the nail on the head.

Even so, on August 19, 2016, Time magazine ran a cover illustration of Trump's face dissolving headlined: "Meltdown". Two and half months later a combination of factors, none related to Trump's campaign (as far as we know) combined to create the most stunning upset in modern American politics.2


1 The DNC had done a similar thing prior to the 2008 presidential election which had a lot to do with Barrack Obama becoming president. But during the ensuing eight years, the DNC atrophied and was one of the several factors that led to Hillary Clinton's surprising defeat.

2 Everyone agrees, including Trump, that he never had a shot at winning. But, Conway's prediction of the "hidden Trump voter" was correct. Clinton's bad choices on how and where to campaign, and when and where to put their resources put Trump within striking distance. After that, the massive Russian disinformation campaign in favor of Trump (including Wikileaks) and FBI director James Comey's ill-thought out release of information regarding reopening the Clinton email scandal all conspired to 1) dissolution many Clinton voters into not voting or voting for one of the third party candidates and 2) persuaded the hidden Trump voters to vote and to vote for Trump.

The Real Story of Donald Trump

Chapter 4 - Russia

In the summer of 2015, the Russian's stepped up their effort to destabilize America and our election process as well as influence the outcome. During that summer, Russia attack local and state voter registration apparatus. Ultimately, 21 states were attacked that we know of. My question, given what we know today, is "was Russia trying to steal voters names and information in order to better target their social media campaign?" I would suspect yes.

Trump and his surrogates, to this day, deflect by trying to blame President Obama for not doing anything about it. Even though many in the intelligence community (IC) think Obama did not do enough to counter Russian cyber-warfare, it is not true Obama did nothing.

James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence (DNI), included the initial information in the President's Daily Brief (PDB) at some point after the intrusions were observed. In July 2016, Wikileaks and DC Leaks (using Russian provided information) began the "drip, drip, drip" of information helpful to Trump and harmful to Clinton.

President Obama was caught in a no-win Hobson's Choice. Should Obama go on prime-time and announce Russia's attack to America and the world? But if he did then he would be accused of trying to get Hillary Clinton elected and the country was in the mood to believe that lie.

On the other hand, Obama could say nothing and risk being accused after the election of doing nothing. Which is exactly what happened since Obama chose not to make the world announcement. But he didn't do nothing.

Obama approved John Brennan, CIA director, to contact his Russian counterpart and "raise the issue." So, on August 4, Brennan did so. He told his counterpart that "You're meddling in our election. We know it. We have it cold." Bortnikov, the counterpart, "flatly denied it."

The next day, Mike Morell, former deputy CIA director and twice acting director, published an op-ed in The New York Times. The headline: "I ran the CIA. Now I'm Endorsing Hillary Clinton." Then Morell accused Trump of being "an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation." - Now the word is out.

The next step of "doing nothing" was to have Clapper brief the Gang of Eight in Congress - four Republican and four Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate. - Now the word is out again. Clapper was disgusted after the briefing, by the way. He was disgusted at how the "Republicans disliked everything about the briefing" and how the "Democrats loved every morsel ...".

For the most part, the Russians, up to this point, were generally trying to sow discord into American elections, with a definite bias in helping Trump. Now, sensing that Clinton was a shoe-in, they started focusing harder on undermining Hillary Clinton and her campaign.

Again, Obama approved Clapper and Jeh Johnson, Secretary of the Department of Homeless Security (DHS), on October 7, a month before the election, made a public release:

"The U.S. intelligence community is confident the Russian government directed the recent compromise of emails from U.S. persons and institutions. These thefts an disclosures are intended to interfere with the U.S. election process. Russia's senior-most officials are the only ones who could have authorized the activities."

Once again, Obama warned America. But America wasn't listening. Instead, we paid attention to something more immediate and dangerous to America - when it was reported that Donald Trump once bragged:

"You can do anything. Grab them (women) by the pussy."

This came when NBC reported and played the now infamous (and forgotten) Access Hollywood tape of Trump's braggadocio about he could (and did) grope and kiss women to his heart's content.

The "Tapes"

It could be argued now (but not then) that what saved the Trump candidacy was his claim that "you can do anything [to women]. Grab them by the pussy" As it turned out, the kind of people, women and men, who ended up voting for Trump didn't find that remark particularly offensive. (I suspect many men agree with it.) But, at the time, it created a huge uproar. Huge enough to drown out the revelations that the Russians were trying to help Trump get elected by trashing Hillary Clinton. The latter was a massive, game-changing announcement by the Obama administration yet - nobody noticed. Further drowning out the attack by Russia on American politics was Wikileaks starting its drip-drip-drip campaign of stolen emails.

Trump quickly released a videotaped apology (later retracted). It said:

"I've never said I am a perfect person ... those words don't reflect who I am. I said it, I was wrong and I apologize ... I pledge to be a better man tomorrow, I will never, ever let you down."

But he didn't stop there and went on to ruin the apology by saying:

"Let's be honest. We are living in the real world. This is nothing more than a distraction ... Bill Clinton has actually abused women [of course, so has Trump]and Hillary bullied, attached, shamed, and intimidated his women ... see you at the debate on Sunday."

But it isn't "now" it was "then" and they were frightened out of their collective minds. Priebus said "The donors are all out. Everybody's dropped. Paul Ryan's going to drop this afternoon. It's over." Later, "You have two choices," he tells Trump, "You either drop out now or you're going to lose in the biggest landslide in American history ..." and it went on for awhile. Then Priebus offered, "If you want to do it now, Pence is prepared to step up, and Condi Rice will come in as VP."

Knowing Trump's base, Bannon commented that, "That's never going to happen. That's ridiculous. F---g absurd." Chris Christi agreed with Priebus, "This is not about the campaign. This is about your brand ..." And Giuliani, "Basically you have got 40%" (of winning). Conway offers, "Do we call 60 minutes? ... sitting on a couch with Ivanka on one side and Melania on the other, basically crying, saying 'I apologize'." But Melania had come in and said, "Not doing that. No. No way. No, no, no."

In the end, they decided Trump would go on air and apologize - and then they didn't. In the end, with Trump in the studio, Trump cancelled and went downstairs into the street (much to the Secret Service's horror) to meet his supporters. A reporter asked, "Are you staying in the race?" Trump replies, "100 percent!".

Bob Woodward's description of these events is much more detailed and interesting, by the way. One final note, however, is of interest as well. Rudy Giuliani was the only Trump mouthpiece to hit the Sunday talk shows, all of them, to offer an explanation. For his effort Trump told him,

"Rudy, you're a baby! I have never seen a worse defense of me in my life. They took your diaper off right there. You're like a little baby that needed to be changed. When are yo going to be a man?"

And later to Bannon in front of Rudy,

"It was a mistake (putting Rudy on). He shouldn't have gone on. He's weak. You're weak, Rudy. You've lost it."

Today, of course, Rudy Giuliani is defending Trump from the Special Counsel Robert Mueller onslaught.


© 2018 My Esoteric

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • My Esoteric profile imageAUTHOR

      My Esoteric 

      3 weeks ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      When did you send the edits, Paula. I am looking at where those emails go and nothing jumps out at me.

      I am a pragmatic sort who worries, up to a point, more about a politicians policies, rather than their personality. That's why Bill's infidelities didn't bother me, or much of America apparently. I have always found both Clinton's policies, as well as Obama's, reflect my beliefs.

      At least publicly, I have never seen HRC act in as despicable, less than human, bullying way as Trump does. Trump's demeanor cannot be overlooked because it negatively effects our standing in the world.

      Now things might be different privately, but I am not privy to that.

      I will need some links to what you say about HRC because I couldn't find anything right away by googling it (save for something by Hannity)

    • fpherj48 profile image

      Paula 

      3 weeks ago from Beautiful Upstate New York

      FYI......By HP mail, I mean the option on our profiles that states, "Contact Author." If I'm not mistaken, it's gmail and it should arrive into your own personal email account. If I don't see that you've been able to make the few corrections....I'll add them for you here in your thread.

      I am stunned that someone of your apparent intelligence, self-research & in-depth knowledge, is an HRC supporter. But as of late, a lot of observations have shocked me to my core. Frankly, the books I didn't NEED to read were those on HRC. As a lifelong New Yorker, I was not only in her presence several times, but closely associated with many of her "auxiliary staff" here in Upstate (like the man-now deceased- who controlled her Headquarters in our districts.) The information I have gathered on the "infamous woman-scorned" is all first-hand experience....not fake news, speculation, nor is any of it "right-wing conspiracy." I know so much that if I had a famous persona, I would write my own scorching book. The reality simply is, a book written by some generic grandmother from WNY, would be only a total waste of my time and efforts. I'm a realist, after all. I can & will tell you, here & now, without question, the woman is a falling-down drunk. If not for her incredibly protective personal team, this fact would be clearly exposed as an absolute fact as opposed to simple backroom whisperings. Even the staff at our luxury hotels where she would stay, witnessed her being literally carried in at night and dumped, clothes and all, into her bed, Secret Service later finding her naked, on all fours, puking and losing control of her bowels on the floor. ("Madam President??") The same Secret Service members she insulted and swore at to their faces. If you do choose to read any books written by people very close to her situation, read the one written by the SS Agent...whose name escapes me at the moment (I apologize, but you'll find it) He describes the violent outbursts and her many tantrums behind the scenes. There were numerous times they had to "rescue" Bill as she physically attacked him and proceeded to beat the crap out of him......(not that he doesn't deserve that! LOL) Her drunkenness and violence are actually her "smaller faults." My question though, do these small faults qualify her as being the moral, ethical superior to any other politicians? I revert back to my one firm belief. 95% of Politicians are seriously corrupt, flawed individuals, which should horrify us that our very lives are in their hands. That's my main, FIRM belief, at least until I can clearly see otherwise.

      Your review is coming along just fine.

    • My Esoteric profile imageAUTHOR

      My Esoteric 

      3 weeks ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      Paula, thanks. Now I need to figure out HP mail. Never used it before.

      For sure, Kathleen.

      Paula,

      Perceived economy woes rule. So many blue collar Ds who voted for Trump voted on Trump's lies and the fact that only the rich mostly benefited from the recovery. Listening to the news, there is a large portion of those who will do it again. Fortunately, Trump is not gaining anymore supporters, only losing them.

      Right now, I am a HRC supporter, but now have to read some of the books on her. The only one I have read is "Shattered" which left me with a great understanding of why Trump got within shouting distance.

    • fpherj48 profile image

      Paula 

      3 weeks ago from Beautiful Upstate New York

      Hmmm, Interesting. I surely didn't "need" to read this book, but I wanted to, so I did. Very good book, actually. However, I've known since way back, who and what DJT was/is. (Did the birther fiasco or public pissing match with Rosie O'Donnel, give no one a slight clue?) Nothing about him has surprised nor shocked me. What has given me cause for curiosity is why anyone who had known him (or OF him) to any degree, prior to his current status, has been the least bit taken off-guard. We learn as youngsters that tigers don't change their stripes, whether in the jungle or in captivity, as a circus animal. No big revelation ...not for me anyway.

      As scarce as my free time is, I've managed to read all books published in the last 2+ years, about him as well as the extremely uncomplimentary & damning ones about his nemesis, Ms. HRC. I try to soak it all up from every angle, every source. This doesn't make me an expert by any means, but I feel the confidence of being well-informed. In no way did I require any books to further fuel my intense hatred for Slick Willie's evil sidekick, but I enjoy a book I can smile throughout as I read. Good God, she's one hell of a nasty individual.

      My final thought here? Given our choices, we had no hope of a POTUS with wings & a halo, in either case. Some people are fairly satisfied, some are insanely enraged. This is good for some and oh well, too bad, get over it, for others. In approximately 2 years, we get to do it all over again.

    • Kathleen Cochran profile image

      Kathleen Cochran 

      3 weeks ago from Atlanta, Georgia

      Unfortunately, most of the folks who need to read this book wouldn't get caught dead reading it.

    • fpherj48 profile image

      Paula 

      4 weeks ago from Beautiful Upstate New York

      Just a "few small" corrections, but important, nonetheless....sent in a message via HP mail.

    • My Esoteric profile imageAUTHOR

      My Esoteric 

      4 weeks ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      It is a good read for sure. I am up to Chapter 11.

    • My Esoteric profile imageAUTHOR

      My Esoteric 

      4 weeks ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      It is a good read for sure. I am up to Chapter 11.

    • peoplepower73 profile image

      Mike Russo 

      4 weeks ago from Placentia California

      And the plot thickens; I can't wait for the other chapters Your review makes me want to go buy the book.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)