ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Politics: Strike Out the Line Item Veto

Updated on December 11, 2017
William F. Torpey profile image

Graduated NYU 1964. Worked in NYC in public relations 2 years then as reporter/news editor 32 years at The Hour newspapers. Retired in 2000.

America's Founding Fathers

Founding Fathers
Founding Fathers

Line Item Veto Still in Question

The U.S. Supreme Court did not say the line-item veto is constitutional when it declined to take up the issue recently; it merely said it could not take up the case until the issue is properly brought before it; that is, by someone with proper "standing."

Sure, President Clinton can go ahead and use the line-item veto, as he said he would, but that would be unwise because, almost certainly, any such action would be ruled unconstitutional when the court revisits the matter. I'd prefer not to have to witness the chaos that would accompany the unraveling of such unconstitutional (actions.)

Separation of Powers

The existence of the separation of powers that our founding fathers strived so hard to achieve is a major reason the Constitution has worked so well for more than 200 years. Rewriting it now to allow the executive, judicial and legislative branches to fall out of balance could only lead to disaster.

The Constitution gives the House the power of the purse, and the procedure for bills to become law is made clear: Action by Congress before presentation to the president for his signature.

Use of a line-item veto, because it revises the legislation before the president adds his signature, would be equivalent to participation in the drafting of the bill.

Obviously Unconstitutional

This procedure would allow the president to help draft the law and then sign it. It's not a great deal different from the same person or body acting as both judge and jury. Obviously, it is not constitutional.

Today's political leaders should look long and hard before tinkering with the Constitution. Our founding fathers were ordinary men, of course, but, at the same time, they were extraordinary thinkers and politicians. If it were not for their intelligence and wisdom, as exemplified by the government they created, where would we be today?

The writers of the Constitution not only reinforced the document with the Bill of Rights, but they had the foresight to make provision for the inevitable changes they knew would someday be required. Our journeys into outer space and the incredible development of technology could not have been imagined 200 years ago.

Easy Solutions Inadvisable

As we prepare to enter the 21st Century, our country, as the world's acknowledged leader, must avoid what appear to be easy solutions to complicated problems. Any action that threatens the long-term stability of the United States, and, therefore, the world, should not be taken merely for temporary political advantage.

The line-item veto is one of those issues that, without long and careful consideration, sounds great: Let the president strike out all the fat from the budgets! But, like the proposals for an Equal Rights Amendment and a Balanced Budget Amendment, a closer look reveals the truth: These ideas create more problems than they solve.

President Clinton apparently didn't think this one through, tempting as it may be, politically, to take advantage of the moment. I'm sure he'll eventually do as his oath of office requires: Defend the Constitution!

I wrote this column as a "My View" for The Hour newspaperof Norwalk, Conn., on Aug. 2, 1997. I now write my views on a wide variety of topics on HubPages.

Do You Favor the Line-Item Veto?

See results

President Clinton Uses Line Item Veto for the First Time


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • William F. Torpey profile imageAUTHOR

      William F Torpey 

      11 years ago from South Valley Stream, N.Y.

      Bob, each Supreme Court justice has his own take on how to interpret the Constitution, and I'm afraid there's no way of getting around that. At the moment the court leans toward the conservatives with four liberal-leaning justices and five conservatives, including Justice Kennedy, who appears to be the swing vote. We need to avoid any Constitutional conventions to prevent changes that will cause the loss of our existing rights. The line-item veto might cut down on the pork, but it would usher in a whole new -- and bigger -- problem than we already have (giving the president legislative powers even greater than those of Congress!)

    • profile image


      11 years ago

      Bill.The politicians have been messing around with the Constitution for quite some time now. Take Teddy Kennedy. In one breath he'll sayb it's a living document and Judge Bork should not be appointed to the bench because he interpets it as it was written ,then when Clinton gets impeached , Teddy says can't do it because its not in the Comstitution. Seems politicians want to interpet the Constitution in whatever way fits their needs. As far as the line item veto.. It might cut down on some of the useless pork that put into the budgets.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)