ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The 2nd Amendment Means This to Me

Updated on June 19, 2013

Written at a different time in history

I see the point for the 2nd Amendment at the time it was written. It was necessary for the survival of the United States and it's citizens but it was written a long time ago and things do change over time. I am not advocating that it be discarded as a U.S. citizen's right but how it should be put into practice.

What triggered this particular hub for me was the posting I saw on Facebook by members of the National Association for Gun Rights which depicted Washington, Jerfferson, Madison and Hamilton favouring the 2nd Amendment and Mao Tse Tung, Stalin, Lenin and Hitler not favouring the same Amendment. On the surface it looks like the tyrants are wrong and the American forefathers are right.

There is no mention of the fact that there is close to 150 years difference in historical time to the two groups and weaponry development is significantly more developed for the second group. In Washington's time you could really only get flintlock pistols and rifles so most everyone was on an even playing field and they were single shot weapons. I don't know if the Roosevelts and Churchill were in favour of the 2nd Amendment but they were of the same time period of history of the second group mentioned by the gun rights group.

The important thing to understand in the latter timeframe is that weapon development now included rifles, handguns, submachine guns, machine guns, grenades and anti-tank weapons, just to name a few. The key difference over the flintocks is that a lot of the more modern weapons were capable of discharging multiple rounds and were capable of creating much more damage than the former older technology.

So the 2nd Amendment allowed for the right to bear arms (flintlocks). So does that mean I am advocating that a U.S. citizen should only be allowed to buy flintlocks for their protection? The answer is a simple no. Instead, it is more about the fact that gun buyers should be able to purchase single shot weapons in the spirit of the original document and owning anything else in not legal unless you are on duty with the police or armed forces.

But this is not my decision since I am a resident and citizen of your neighbour to the north--Canada. I am hoping that common sense will win out and a reasonable approach will evolve that will result in less violence because it is present everywhere now, not just in the United States. If things don't improve we will just end up using guns to kill one another instead of protecting each other which was the spirit of the 2nd Amendment. Let's use our heads and come up with a workable solution people. Too many innocent people have died because guns ended up in the wrong hands. Let's find a way to protect each other while still allowing those who wish to own guns do so but not at the expense of innocent lives. Park the emotional stance and take a logical approach to the survival of a way of life.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • jr_leatherneck profile image

      jr_leatherneck 5 years ago from Houston, Texas

      Those who want to repeal the 2nd Ammendment will never agree with those who refuse to lose the 2nd Ammendment. Bozoplay made a good point. "Too many innocent people have died because guns ended up in the wrong hands". In the wrong hands. Again, in the wrong hands. Because someone commited a crime, others want to infringe on my rights? Really? Punish the innocent? Most gun owners are responsible and are not the "wrong hands." We should solve the real problems and not infringe on our Constitutional rights. I know some won't understand, because they don't want to and refuse to try to understand.

    • Superkev profile image

      Superkev 5 years ago

      Then you should take a look at Chicago and ask them how those regulations are doing at preventing violence. It's already against the law to shoot and kill someone, do you think telling someone who is determined to commit an act of mass killing they can't load their weapon with more than 10 rounds is going to stop them?

      The speed limit is not enshrined in our Bill of Rights, the right to keep and bear arms that 'shall not be infringed' is however.

      Luckily, Sen. Fienstien's bill is DOA in the Senate and is just being used as a distraction anyhow. They can't pass a budget in 4 years but they can write up a gun control bill in 4 days.

    • profile image

      Chelsea Heaps 5 years ago

      I absolutely agree. The assault weapons ban is a responsible approach and still allows for 2nd amendment rights.

      To the commenter above, there are many regulations regarding vehicles. They cannot go above 65 mph on California highways for instance, seat belts are required, etc.

      Of course people should be able to buy guns and use them for self-defense or hunting, however there should be certain restrictions to prevent gun violence.

    • Superkev profile image

      Superkev 5 years ago

      Because in our system of government, the leaders are not royalty and do not govern by decree, that is what we fought against and why our Constitution is worded how it is, to prevent there from ever being such an imperial government in this country.

      There is a reason the first 10 amendments are called the Bill of Rights, and they are separate and apart from all others. These are sacrosanct and unalienable as the basic rights of an American.

      The Constitution can be amended only one way, via congress and then ratification of the states. Obama cannot just decide he wants to make a new law, he is not the king, even though he acts as if he thinks he is.

    • profile image

      GavNugent 5 years ago

      Why do you have the right to own guns? Because the government of the time the constitution was written saw fit for you to have that right. Why can't they take it away now?

      The second amendment will do nothing to protect you from a tyrannical government these days I'm afraid.

    • Superkev profile image

      Superkev 5 years ago

      Sorry, but what the 2nd amendment means to a Canadian? Really?

      It means nothing to you, but it means a whole lot to us.

      Your flintlock analogy is nonsensical at best. The advancement in technology does not negate the Bill of Rights.

    • jr_leatherneck profile image

      jr_leatherneck 5 years ago from Houston, Texas

      We should have the right to own any gun that the government can own. If the government uses single shot guns then that is what we should have. If they have M-16s, then we should have the right to own them.

      Someone will take this view to the extreme. I understand there are those against guns. Shall my rights be infringed on because someone else breaks the law.

      If someone kills someone else with a car, does it make sense to limit my car to 4 cylinders?


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: ""

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)