ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • North America Political & Social Issues

South East Bexar County Awareness: The ESD#6 went into receivership

Updated on June 23, 2014
Sylvia Ruiz Mendelsohn, President, ESD#6.
Sylvia Ruiz Mendelsohn, President, ESD#6. | Source
County Commissioner, Precinct 1. Sergio "Chico" Rodriguez
County Commissioner, Precinct 1. Sergio "Chico" Rodriguez | Source

Ms. Sylvia Ruiz Mendelsohn, board president of the ESD#6 is also the co-founder of the Thelma Area Neighborhood Corporation. According to; Ms. Ruiz and Mr. Jimmie Lopez (former Southside ISD Board member, former BexarMet Water District Board member) assumed the name for their community organization. The same Thelma Area Neighborhood Corporation whose current president, Mr. Theo Castillo attended a recent ESD#6 board meeting; and at which time he thanked them for all their hard work at finally bringing the community center to their area. Ms. Mendelsohn's organization will also be overseeing the daily activities of running the community center.

Conflict of Interest?

The ESD#6 had the courts decide their fate.

The ESD6 went into receivership......not so quickly...says Ms. Mendelsohn's actions.

Local firefighters attended a hearing in which the ESD#6 was to come under "receivership"; an agreement was reached by the ESD6 board President, Sylvia Mendelsohn, her attorney Louis T. Rosenberg and the other parties involved that the ESD#6 would make the payments on accounts due so that Sandy Oaks VFD would not lose their ladder truck and other vehicles as well as giving some (very little) capital to the departments to help with costs, but not fully funding either one.

Waiting for funds which would not come for at least a couple more months. A receiver was to be appointed to handle the activities of the ESD#6 while finances and contracts were straightened out. A procedure taken when wrongdoing is found and so that a legal solution can be had without having a full blown lawsuit.


See results

The Project must go on......

Mr. Gil Perez, ESD#1 board member and Director of SAFE D, who was slotted to speak to the Southside Community at a canceled meeting of the ESD#6, did attend the rescheduled meeting. And it was noted that he didn't say anything that hadn't already been repeated by people in the commissioner's office as well as members of the community, legal and not.

The same could not be said from members of the community.

  • South Bexar Fire & Rescue, while the only ones under contract, were now questioning their contract. They were shown a new contract on the evening of December 21st, the evening before the ESD#6 was to go to court to appoint a "monitor". Leading to the question, why? Why would you give a new contract on the eve of appointing someone to negotiate contracts?

  • South Bexar- former fire chief David Crowley clearly stated that he did not sign. The contract that he had signed was on October 1, 2010.

  • A gentleman from the Thelma area, Mr. Fernando Rodriguez, questioned the use of fire fighter funds for the community center. It was noted that Ms. Mendelsohn avoided answering his question as to who would actually be running the facility and that it was just "semantics" with the federal government, as far as calling it an evacuation center to secure the grant.

Obstruction Causes Change of Plans:

Ms. Mendelsohn was not happy with the choices she was given and wanted to appoint her own selection, both members of the Fire Marshal's office, who have ties to the construction of the new community/evacuation center as Ms. Mendelsohn has continuously talked of the center being used by the Fire Marshal's office for training, etc.

  • Therefore, a receiver was not assigned until a later date and instead a judge was to find a suitable individual to help oversee the ESD#6 daily activities. After returning to court for a meeting with the judge, Ms. Mendelsohn was not pleased with the judges selection either and instead opted to call an emergency meeting on Tuesday the 21st of December 2010. The meeting was originally scheduled for Monday, the 20th of December but was rescheduled for Tuesday the 21st of December 2010, the same day as the ESD#6 was to appear in court again to have a "monitor" appointed by the judge. The hearing was then scheduled for Wednesday, December the 22nd, at which time Mr. Stephen Allison was appointed as a monitor, beginning on January 1, 2011.

The court found:

1)The ESD 6 has a legal duty to provide safe and adequate levels of fire and emergency protection within its service area.

2) That public trust within its service area has been compromised and presents a substantial threat of harm to the public.

3) That the school district will continue to be harmed by the continued failure of the ESD#6 to provide safe and adequate levels of fire and emergency protection.

4) That a Court Monitor is necessary in this case to stabilize the management and to assure safe and adequate levels of fire and emergency protection during the litigation.


Mr. Stephen Allison; the monitor would report to the judge. Ms. Mendelsohn and her board would still have access to the daily activities. Although their seats have expired since December 31, 2010, they have remained on "hold over" status.

Reasons sited as to why the Commissioners appointed the individuals currently on the board was due to no one applying for the board positions. Four members of the community had applied for positions and received letters from the commissioners office that they were going with more qualified individuals. One community member had 20 plus years of fire safety experience.

Seems Like Old Times:

ESD6 board records show that the court appointed monitor did not receive payment for services either, as the ESD6 was waiting for money from a loan to pay their bills, having spent the money that was set aside for the monitors fees.

The appointment of the monitor seems to have been a waste of not just time, but financial resources that the firefighters could have used instead. The contracts that were agreed upon have not been held up by the ESD6 board.

Come October of 2013, the last of the three volunteer fire departments will no longer make calls in the South east Bexar County area. The members of Southeast Bexar County have sat back and let Ms. Mendelsohn, County Commissioner Rodriguez and their pawns on the board dictate and control their money and their safety. Leaving them with debt and no safety.

  • How do you apply to become a member of the ESD #6 board, you must apply for the position. Candidates that have a background in business, medicine or fire safety will be good candidates for the position, but not required. Anyone that is interested can go on the county commissioners website at and download the application.


Submit a Comment

  • profile image

    Jose Farinaccci 7 years ago

    I just had to reply to the who is lying now. We all know that Chico is nothing but a two cent liar, well not even a half a cent liar. I got his emails that show what a class act he is. Rosemberg, well the man definitely gives attorneys as bad name. Im kind of starting to wonder if something is going on between him and Sylvia. They seem pretty tight.

  • Abecedarian profile image

    Abecedarian 7 years ago from These United States, Texas

    Yes ma'am it is disappointing. However, I did receive a call that they attended a meeting with Chico Rodriguez on Saturday at the Southside ISD campus. It was a community meeting, but most members didn't know it had taken place. One particularly angry community member stated that they told them that the fire departments were not certified. Of course, at this point it is hearsay because it was my understanding that it was stated by Louis Rosenberg, the ESD6 attorney on the December 21, meeting that he had already received the certifications for the fire fighters and he was to give copies of those to the ESD6, which he had at his office So, who's lying now? Chico or Louis Rosenberg

  • Melissa Hammond profile image

    Melissa Hammond 7 years ago from San Antonio

    THe "monitor" did not show up. A few concerned citizens did waste their time and gas to be there. And they were very upset there was not a meeting. The canceled the meeting via by phone, they don't take the time to show up to even see if they that quorum.

  • Abecedarian profile image

    Abecedarian 7 years ago from These United States, Texas

    I was looking forward to attending the meeting and meeting Mr. Perez only to find out that the meeting was canceled. I was told that it was due to lack of a quorum and that the only member that showed up to the meeting was Mr. Chavez. If Ms. Mendelsohn and Ms. Vargas had shown up as required by Open Meetings Act, there would have been a quorum and they could have held the meeting.I'm glad I didn't waste my time and fuel to get there, but still disappointed that it didn't happen. Do you know if the "monitor" showed up?

  • profile image

    Concerned Citizen 7 years ago

    I have done a little bit of asking around with different Fire Dept personnel in the County, it turns out that Mr. Gill Perez does not have such a spotless reputation that he claims to have. In fact everyone I have talked to doesn't trust him at all. He has to many political ties and he owes to many favors. It is not by accident this gentleman is speaking tonight at the ESD 6 board meeting. He must be a Chico Rodriguez puppet.