ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Mueller Report and Donald Trump; An Analysis - Part 7: Obstruction - The Evidence: The Attempted Firing of Mueller

Updated on July 7, 2019
My Esoteric profile image

ME has spent most of his retirement from service to the United States studying, thinking, and writing about the country he served.

Donald Trump in the Cross-Hairs

Until Donald Trump fired James Comey "because of Russia", he was not personally being investigated by the FBI counterintelligence unit. But on May 17, 2017, Rod Rosenstein, the acting attorney general for Russia matters, appointed Robert S. Mueller, III as Special Counsel. He "authorized him to conduct the Russia investigation and matters that arose from the investigation."

The appointment was a direct result of the firing of the FBI director and the cloud of obstruction of justice that resulted. Now, Donald Trump, as a consequence of his own actions, was now the subject of an investigation; one of those unintended consequences from not thinking through decisions deeply enough and not listening to your advisors and councils.

Getting from Not Being Investigated to the Focus of Attention

It didn't take long, really:

  1. On May 9, 2017, Donald Trump fired FBI Director James Comey
  2. From May 10, 2017 until May 17, 2017, there was a hue and cry over the firing accusing Trump of obstructing the Russian investigation
  3. On May 17, 2017, acting Attorney General for Russian matters Rod Rosenstein, a Trump appointee, appointed Robert Mueller, a Republican and former FBI director, to take over the FBI's investigation into Russia's interference in America's elections and possible obstruction of justice by Donald Trump.

In just a little more than a week, Trump went from not being the subject of an FBI investigation to being the subject of a Special Council's investigation. Quite a feat.

So, with lesson in mind, what does Trump do next? Immediately begin a two-year campaign to get rid of the Special Council.

Obstructive Acts - Evidence

On May 17, 2017, Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller as Special Council to take over the FBI investigation into Russian interference in our elections "and any related matters" (such as obstruction of justice for firing Comey). Upon learning of this decision, Trump said "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked." and then continued to bemoan what this investigation will do to his presidency as well as castigate AG Sessions for his recusal decision and that " 'you were supposed to protect me,' or words to that effect." It was at this point where Trump told Sessions he should resign (a potential obstructive act) and Sessions complied by giving Trump a letter of resignation. Trump ultimately did not accept it, but held on to the letter anyway. That action concerned Chief of Staff Priebus and Steve Bannon because of the implicit threat being held over Sessions head. Priebus said "Priebus said the President had "DOJ by the throat." Finally, under pressure from Priebus, Trump did return the letter.

Nevertheless, Trump pressured McGahn to contact Rosenstein about Trump's allegations of Mueller's conflicts. McGahn refused and said "that he could not make such a call and that the President should instead consult his personal lawyer because it was not a White House issue." followed up by "that he would suggest that the President not make such a call [to Rosenstein] either."

Worse, McGahn told Trump that "that his "biggest exposure" was not his act of firing Comey but his "other contacts" and "calls," and his "ask re: Flynn." Trump was on clear notice that his actions were wrong within days of Robert Mueller's investigation began.

In the middle of all of this the FBI ordered White House council Don McGahn to preserve all evidence regarding the firing of James Comey. McGahn immediately told staff not to process burn bags.

On June 8, 2017, ex-director James Comey testified before Congress and reported on attempts by Trump to gain his personal loyalty. "let Flynn go," and to "lift the cloud".

On June 9, 2017, the Special Counsels office told the White House it was going to talk to the Intelligence Community about Trump's reported attempts "to push back against the Russia investigation".

On June 12, 2017, Christopher Ruddy, longtime friend of Trump and chief executive of Newsmax Media, met with Trump and others who told him that he was still "strongly" tempted to fire Mueller and to do so without any input from staff. Ruddy asked Priebus, who was at the meeting, if he could report this news and was given the go-ahead. Ruddy did and it upset Trump in the process.

On June 13, 2017, Trump's personal counsel (apparently Trump ignored McGahn's advice) contacted the Special Counsel about the supposed "conflicts". That same day, Rosenstein testified that "he saw no evidence of good cause to terminate the Special" Counsel , including for conflicts of interest."

On June 14, the press reported that Trump was under investigation. Shortly thereafter, Trump began his campaign to discredit Robert Mueller and the investigation. First by publicly saying Mueller had "conflicts of interest" and was "conflicted"1 and later by direct attacks on the investigators character.

The next day Trump began a series of tweets about the investigation that have not ended as we are half way through 2019. His opening broadside was

"They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story . Nice" "You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history-led by some very bad and conflicted people! " and "Crooked H destroyed phones w/ hammer, 'bleached' emails, & had husband meet w/AG days before she was cleared - & they talk about obstruction?"

On June 16, 2017, Trump followed up with:

"After 7 months of investigations & committee hearings about my ' collusion with the Russians,' nobody has been able to show any proof. Sad!"; and "I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director!2 Witch Hunt."

On June 17, 2017, Trump ordered Don McGahn to fire Robert Mueller, he wanted McGahn to tell Rosenstein the "Muller had to go". McGahn demurred. Trump pressed and pressed until McGahn decided he had no option but to resign because he would not do Trump's bidding. He drove to his office to pack his bags and told his chief of staff, Annie Donaldson, of his decision - but not why. Donaldson could guess the general outline3 and was prepared to depart with McGahn. McGahn also told Priebus and Bannon he was resigning, but again not why - they thought to protect them. Both urged McGahn not to resign to which he acquiesced. McGahn never told Trump he was resigning and Trump finally dropped the issue.

1 The so-called conflicts were investigated by DOJ and found not to be material.

2 Of course that is not true because Trump decided to fire Comey long before they brought DOJ into the picture.

3 Trump had called Donaldson several times and on at least one occasion had asked her "had he [McGahn] done it?"


Nexus - Evidence

The Nexus for this obstructive act is simple - Trump wants to fire Mueller (the obstructive act) and Mueller is leading the investigation into Trump - 'nuf said.

Corrupt Intent - Evidence

Did Donald Trump know firing Mueller was wrong? What evidence is there of that. Probably the strongest piece is when Don McGahn told him "that the President could discuss the issue [Trump's accusations of Mueller's 'conflicts'] with his personal attorney but it would "look like still trying to meddle in [the] investigation " and "knocking out Mueller " would be "[a]nother fact used to claim obst[ruction] of justice."

There are other examples of when Trump was told what he is doing is wrong, but I will leave it at the above.

Analyzing the Attempted Firing of Special Counsel Robert Mueller

Obstructive Act - Analysis

To be an obstructive act, it must be reasonable that the act, even though not carried out, will or could interfere with an official federal investigation. In this case, the obstructive act was the attempted firing of the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller.

Mueller had been appointed by Rod Rosenstein after Trump had fired James Comey, then the director of the FBI who headed up an ongoing investigation into the Trump Campaign, their connection with the Russians, and the Russian interference. Mueller's job was to 1) take over Comey's investigation and 2) begin possible obstruction charges against Trump; a new investigative path resulting from Trump's actions.

Nexus - Analysis

Again, this was not convoluted. Robert Mueller had just been appointed by Rod Rosenstein to investigate Donald Trump for obstruction of justice. He was also appointed to take over the counter-espionage investigation that James Comey was heading up that was looking into Trump's Campaign and its involvement with the Russian attack on America's political system as well as the Russia attack itself. Mueller was running an official investigation likely to lead to an official proceeding grand jury) or prosecution.

The investigation just started so how do you get to a "proceeding"? To do this "it would be necessary to establish a nexus between the President's act of seeking to terminate the Special Counsel and a pending or foreseeable grand jury proceeding"

Had Trump been successful, the firing of Mueller would at the very least hampered this investigation, and therefore any subsequent "proceeding". But being successful isn't necessary to form such a nexus, just the attempt is all that is needed.

Corrupt Intent - Analysis

Mueller reports that "Substantial evidence" exists to indicate that Trump's attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to Mueller's investigation of Trump's conduct and to reports that he was being investigated for potential obstruction of justice." The evidence presented above shows Trump was well aware that his acts were probably wrong. Nevertheless, he tried to have Mueller removed anyway via Don McGahn; which McGahn would have quit before doing. Mueller concludes with "Instead of relying on his personal counsel to submit the conflicts claims [as McGahn had suggested], the President sought to use his official powers to remove the Special Counsel."

There is no question left that Mueller thought Trump had obstructed justice in trying to have Mueller removed.

© 2019 Scott Belford

working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)