ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • United States Politics


Updated on March 16, 2011

The top flag is a civil American flag!

The bottom flag is a military flag!

Neither of these flags is exactly like the one you will see in post offices ,courtrooms,or "any" federal building. That flag you always see in such places has a fringe along the bottom of it,indicating what kind of law it represents.Namely international Merchant law,or law of the sea,or maritime law,which is representitive of the power that law represents.Just as the several state flags in use to identify them from other flags representing other countries or"states".

The fact is a state is a country in and of itself. This should be self-evident by virtue of the different laws in each state.This has always been the case.We are citizens of the state in which we were born .Although we don't think of it that way.Of course we are free to move to another country or state if we wish ,and we can gain citizenship in the new country or state if we are allowed to,by law.which we hardly even think about We just assume that we will be because we think of this continental group of states as one big state or country called the unitedstates.But there is yet another UNITEDSTATES.

The "UNITEDSTATES" in all capital letters is a corporation

The "UNITEDSTATES" Corporation's constitution was created outside the "unitedstates" continental constitution.It was incorporated in the "District of columbia"and replaced the corporation called the"DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"that was incorporated in the "district of columbia".

The problem with this is, if you accept the benefits of being a "UNITEDSTATES CITIZEN" or a franchise of that CORPORATION then you are concsidered a CORPORATION for tax purposes and not even considered a person.Although you may see and hear that corporations are persons with all of the rights of a person,nothing could be further from the truth.Corporations are not living beings,just as living beings are not corporations.They just work for them ,or within them.

American citizens engaged in a constitutionally taxable enterprise such as growing,manufacturing,or selling tobbaco,alcohol,or firearms that they "profit" from,is not the same as taxes on wages in exchange for labor in what is considered a fair and equal exchange.Unless there is a tax agreeded upon by the people through an enumeration of their fair share of the amount requested for a particular purpose Enumeration being a count of the number of people the tax is to be extracted from proportionately.Their are many "unitedstates" supreme court cases that said that no new tax was created by the 16th Amendment to the constitution, as it was declared unconstitutional to "inforce" taxing the wages of any American citizen.Although those who are "UNITEDSTATES" CITIZENS who are employees of that corporation are taxed on their wages,are considered "CORPORATE entities by the CORPORATION and they have adopted some of Americas unitedstates constitutional priciiples,such as taxing "privilages" which could be taxed such as working for the federal government.The idea was originally intended to make working for the federal government in the district of columbia unattractive.Unfortunately for the rest of us who are American citizens rather than "UNITEDSTATES CITIZENS" this CORPORATION is one of the biggest employers in the country.

They have fooled most of the people into thinking that they are citizens of the original unitedstates government that was created by our founding fathers.The united states still exists as does it's constitution ,and yet the corporate "UNITEDSTATES" seems to have taken over the unitedstates government ,and acually passed a law making American citizens enimies of the corporate "UNITEDSTATES". This law was aimed at the enemies of the continental unitedstates ,and was changed to mean Americans themselves were the enemy.How could that happen? Remember the devil is in the details.Congress votes on laws without the ability or even the chance to read them. It's no wonder we are in the mess we are.WE have let "George" do it, without oversight by us or our representitives. this appears to have always been the case.The only difference is which George we let do it to us George the 1st,2nd,or 3rd.We have had three presidents named George over the years.The 1st was George Washington,the 2nd was George Herbert Walker Bush,and of course the 3rd was George W.Bush his son.We can count George the 1st of England of course since he was a king over the English colonies ,but some say the other three were treated like kings by the citizens of the Republic of America and the Pre and post Contitutional government both of which we have had.

George Washington of course turned down the offer to become King of the new world.

George Herbert Walker Bush of course was appointed the head of the C.I.A.. that in itself is a point of interest .What made him qualified to head the C.I.A ?.Could it be the fact that the C.I.A. was involved in Corporate interests around the world ,and assassination of foreign leaders who did not copoerate with our Corporate interests?History has shown that to be the case.Oil,mineral,and military,and commercial interests of all kinds The C.I.A. seems to have been a government unto itself,without the consent of our congress as a whole.In fact it could be said that some military personel are intertwined with the C.I.A.The fact that George was a member of a secret society called the skull and bones with connections to European secret societies does raise alarm bells along with his connection to the oil business with the ben laden family and the Saudi's and their dictatorship as well as the fact that he and Saddam Hussien were business partners that broke up when Saddam was deposed eventually,but not before George supplied Saddam with weapons in the hopes that he would be amemible to cooperation of some sort.We all know what happened when Saddam was lured into going after Kuwait's oil fields.Gulf war 1 If Saddam was so bad why did George want to be freinds with the first place?

George W. Bush obviously wanted to finish what his father started ,but it seems he needed the help of his own future vice presidential cadidate to pick himself to be vice president ,which by the way is a first in the history of vice presidential nominations.Bush even said "This would be easier if this were a dictatorship,as long as I was the dictator." and laughs about it,as if he was just joking.I doubt that his vice presidential nomonee Dick Cheney would just be kidding from his statements about presidential power recently.He claims that the president has the power to overrule congress.You would think that would only be true if congress did something unconstitutional.Even so,the people would be the ultimate power not the president.

Lord Rothschild won't let go of his contract owning each person in the united states from 1912 on, as he registered us on the world stock market as a commodity of which we are insured for a huge amount of money in case of our death as when during the revolutionary war whole armies of mercenaries were insured as fighters and insurance policies were collected upon their death by their employer.For every birth in this country of a citizen there is made enough money to take our citizen's civil liberties and turn them us civil indensured servents

On the back of your origanal birth certificate.that the government has in their files there is a number which identifies who are UnitedStates citizens by birth regestered on the world stock market.of the corporate UnitedStates which has been bankrupted by design and were pledged as collateral to the Rothschild's and Rockefeller's as well as other members of the world bank visa via the I.M.F to back.Federal Reserve notes which is what our bills are- "notes." these are merely loans which we are paid in only for the next generation to pay back with their labor.which it seems was never intended to ever be paid back,if,the federal reserve and their masters have anything to say about it.

Are we as free as we think we are?

See results


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Don Joe 6 years ago

      The only thing needed to gain control now is gun control... Once they disarm us it is over!

    • BobbiRant profile image

      BobbiRant 7 years ago from New York

      This was a while back, but great hub.

    • christalluna1124 profile image

      christalluna1124 7 years ago from Dallas Texas


      Thanks for a great hub. We agree on the "Bush, worst Presidents'". This article is very informative and another form of american justice. Thumbs up...keep writing, I will keep reading.

      Warmest regards,


    • robert.dunks profile image

      robert.dunks 8 years ago from great falls, MT

      Very interesting read on a subject that has more and more of myattention by the day. Also thanks for the suggestion on using the search function on here. For some reason or another the thought never crossed my mind. Probably because I'm new on here and it isn't habit yet. I look forward to reading more of your work.

    • Jim Strutzin profile image

      Jim Strutzin 8 years ago

      Great hub! I am pleased to see this information here. Wake up! We're in a lot of trouble!

    • Wealthmadehealthy profile image

      Wealthmadehealthy 8 years ago from Somewhere in the Lone Star State


    • someonewhoknows profile image

      someonewhoknows 8 years ago from south and west of canada,north of ohio

      I have to disagree with you James

      Both Bushes were probably the worst presidents we have ever had.They both pandered to the religious right while doing the most unchristian acts in the name of Christ.There is no worse blasmephy that could done in the name of christianity. The so called war on drugs,by George sr.was a sham.You are trying to seperate George sr. from Reagan because of the Iran contra scam.Bush sr. was head of the C.I.A.just before he became vice president.That's not just a coincidence. If there is any serperating to be done it should probably be Reagan from Bush.George Bush sr. could be compared to Dick Cheney's role as vice president during George W.Bush's election as president.Cheney was the real power ,while George W.Bush could be compared to Ronald Reagan's role as president.Acting as president. That's just what he was doing.Acting

    • James A Watkins profile image

      James A Watkins 8 years ago from Chicago

      I agree. The three George's were the best Presidents we ever had—except for Reagan, of course. :-)

    • someonewhoknows profile image

      someonewhoknows 8 years ago from south and west of canada,north of ohio

      Well,I'm not an expert in business law,but I read something that says if you know how to reclaim your STRAWMAN -CORPORATE NAME which is always in CAPITAL LETTERS by filing a particular u.c.c form - a finnancing statement which you the human who's under your CORPORATE name in all caps with a reservation of all rights to your CORPORATE name are taking over control of any corporate assets in your name - because that's what they are doing,using you the human as collateral to borrow against.They say the average human can earn around a million dollars in their lifetime.So they use that as collateral to pay interest on the national debt.So body is being used as collateral just as if you were a cow that a rancher wanted to borrow against.


      (all rights resrved)

      - see U.C.C 207-1 rights must be reserved in order to sue in court of juristiction merchant law court. (which is what all courts these days sre even if they don't or won't admit to it,either out of ignorance or otherwise.

      John Doe -

      signed by a human underneath the reservation and your corporate name rather than your printed name as I did here. here.

      This has to be done everytime you use your signature for any financial transaction that has anything to do with MERCHANT LAW and CORPORATIONS - which is about everything you can think of ,drivers license,tax forms,buying anything,house cars,bank account applications-read the fine print,they may have a way around this legal manuver.

      Jordan Maxwell - knows more about it than I do .I have his website posted here if your interested in more information.

    • dusanotes profile image

      dusanotes 8 years ago from Windermere, FL

      Interesting slant. Then if we are all stockholders in this corporation, when do we get to cash in our stock and get reimbursed? It's a crazy idea, but you may be onto something, however I didn't see any quotes or citations or did I miss them? Don

    • profile image

      BJC 8 years ago

      Not sure what to think here - pondering.

    • someonewhoknows profile image

      someonewhoknows 8 years ago from south and west of canada,north of ohio

      Thank you for coming jib.

      I appreciate how a great American needs their sleep.At least you won't be bored.

    • greatAmerican profile image

      greatAmerican 8 years ago

      Hey this is going to take my tired old eyes a while to consume, What I have seen is interesting, but the rest will have to wait,, then I might have something else to say..

      I am a tired old man ,I go to bed beat, I get up and I say

      NO I will not blog today,, so what do I do all day, YUP..

    • jiberish profile image

      jiberish 8 years ago from florida

      Very Interesting.