ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

War: Why U.S. Citizens Should Stop Endorsing it

Updated on July 9, 2015

Introduction

“War is peace.” That is the fallacy that the totalitarian government from George Orwell’s novel, "1984," stated in order to maintain control over the citizens. This is the fallacy the United States government implicitly states whenever involving itself in another war. War, of course, is not peace. It is a savage act full of blind hatred that the U.S. government pathetically decorates with ideas of peace. If the U.S. government does not truly desire peace, then what does it desire? Many hypotheses exist on the ulterior motives of the U.S. government's involvement in recent wars. However, this article will not search through the reasons for the United States' thirst for war; it will simply discuss how war is an unwarranted and perverse solution to problems.

When is Murder Right?

Ask almost anyone if murder is wrong and that person will give a resolute "Yes." Yet, most people would agree with the launching of a war on another nation. How does this inconsistency occur? Professor Phillip Zimbardo, a famous social psychologist, provides an insightful answer for this question in his book, "The Lucifer Effect." Zimbardo argues that because we dehumanize the enemy, it allows us to commit atrocities against him or her. If we do not view the opponents in war as people, then we do not have to treat them as such; all morality and mercy does not apply to the enemy who is dehumanized.

Gross sexual misconduct, rape, and severe violence towards the enemy are a nasty part of every war. For example, in the U.S. Abu Ghraib prison located in Iraq, the military officers subjected the prisoners to severe, inhumane abuse in 2004. Those officers even proudly displayed smiles as they forced Iraqi prisoners to get into obscure and sexual positions, taking photos all the while. Of course, the military blamed this incident on a few bad eggs; but, the main lesson to take from this is that when one dehumanizes another, disgusting things can occur. And, dehumanization always comes with war because it allows us to kill through the neglect of a conscience.

War still goes on even though it breeds inhumane behavior. And, who is to say this organized murder is right? Well, Max Weber, a German sociologist, pointed out that the government has the "monopoly on violence." In other words, the government controls and says when it is right to physically harm others.

However, others cannot rightfully direct an individual to commit violence according to the harm principle, proposed by the philosopher John Stuart Mills. This principle argues that "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others." Therefore, the organized violence of war is not right.

The False Notion that All War is a Necessary Evil

Many may say that war is a necessary evil that cannot be avoided. But this is simply not true. War can only be justly waged as a necessary evil when all possible humanitarian strategies to avoid war have been taken. Of course, when a country begins attacking another relentlessly, war is practically impossible to avoid. Yet, most wars can be avoided by forming a cooperative/mutually beneficial relationship with other countries.

The problem is that opposing ideologies, religions, and governments will always act as barriers to international relationships. However, through continual acts of kindness and charity those barriers will dissolve. Even the most obstinate of people can learn to cooperate. The ability to understand and cooperate is what makes us civilized; it is what makes us human. When war is waged, both sides do not believe in the possibility of a cooperative solution; to put it another way, they dehumanize each other, which only leads to destruction. Fighting never acts as a solution; it is only a power struggle for dominance.


War: The Solution of the Ignorant

To engage in war, is to confirm that one is ignorant. Both sides of every war always believe they are completely right; but, actually, they are both completely wrong. The only way to be justified in war is when one's nation is being invaded and attacked by another for power or economic reasons. Otherwise, war is a shameful act that resembles a nation's disregard for the rights of other people/races.

The pride that the U.S. shows for its veterans and victories in war are entirely unwarranted. In Germany, after World War II, the veterans showed great shame in having fought. Germany stopped holding war in high esteem because the nation saw the horrific causes that come from war. The German people understand that war is an evil that pushes people to act barbaric. The U.S. still needs time to realize this and, when we do, it will foster our civility and make us a better nation.

Should war be avoided as much as possible?

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Jay C OBrien profile image

      Jay C OBrien 22 months ago from Houston, TX USA

      Good article. I will add 99.99% of all people are not in a high political position. The common person has little or no say in what his government does. We are individuals with free will. We have a personal choice as to where we live and what groups we join.

      Renounce war and violence for any reason or under any pretense whatsoever. Refuse military service. You may join: the Amish, Mennonites or Quaker.

      I read a hub, "What U.S. Soldiers are Really Fighting to Protect." War. Who is it good for? Support our brave CEOs. Don't Question Wars.

    • Tamara M Wright profile image

      TM Wright 22 months ago from U.S.

      Amen. Good for you, loved your article.

    • lions44 profile image

      CJ Kelly 21 months ago from Auburn, WA

      War is a terrible thing but sometimes it is necessary. Should the Civil War had been fought? Should thousands of Americans been left in bondage? You can't compare Iraq War with WWII or Korea. I take great offense at you saying that "The pride that the U.S. shows for its veterans and victories in war are entirely unwarranted. " Germany declared war on the U.S. and so did Japan. Both nations could have avoided war but chose the wrong path. The GIs should have showed their pride in victory while the Germans should have felt shame. The same with North Korea.

      This notion that you keep stating that Americans don't know war is barbaric is silly. Stop by a veterans hospital or speak with the family of veterans. They all know it is terrible.

      Continual acts of kindness will not result in world peace. As long as extreme religious ideologies exist, violence is inevitable. And sadly, humans have violent tendencies and people must defend themselves.

    Click to Rate This Article