Where Did the 97% on Global Warming Come From?
THERE IS NO CONSENSUS AMONG SCIENTISTS
The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists signing the petition stating "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere ..."
Myth and Fabricated News Media
There is a difference between scientists and “climate scientists’.
About the only things the climate scientists agree on is that 97% - is 100% Wrong.
When I hear high percentages - I always wonder how accurate they are AND how they got those high percentages!
Does anyone else wonder about this?
How did this 97% get started?
At a science conference between 1991 – 2011 with over 12,000 scientists attending. One radical scientist- Australian John Cook asked attending scientists to fill out a paper concerning global warming.
ONLY 4,000 of these scientists bothered. That means 33 – 34% of these scientists filled out anything on John Cooks request. (Filling out a questionnaire does not mean you agree with what he said. Cook on the other hand decided that filling out his request - did agree with him)
66% or 7,930 of the 12,000 took no position on man-made global warning.
ONLY 32.6 percent or 3,896-which is less than half of the 7,980 who filled out his form - endorsed the consensus that humans contribute to global warming (that's 3,896 of the 12,000 scientists- not a good figure to start screaming "global warming."
and 1% either rejected that position or were uncertain about it.
- So how did this global warming get noticed?
- How did the publicity get started on something where the majority of scientists- think global warming has no meaning?
- Could it be as simple as being political?
No surveys of scientists nor research justify Cook’s claim.
Sifting through the Internet
A low 33% appeared to endorse ‘anthropogenic climate change’,
- John Cook THEN divided 33% into 34% that came to 97% and he changed this figure to be 99%. Cook made up this fictional and untruthful figures.
- John Cook author of the 2011 book Climate Change Denial:
- John Cook creator of the blog Skeptical Science.
Of the 11,944 scientists- less than 1.0 percent of the 4,014 even expressed an opinion, actually only 0.3%, certainly NOT the 97.1% he stated!
By doing his math - apparently you can change any percentage to be whatever you want it to be and have the media, politicians agree with you- Al Gore bought into and became a millionaire.
-
These scientists that he is quoting facts from --have protested ‘that they have been misinterpreted!
All Cook managed to sell his misleading percentages 'global warming' theory.
Sifting Through the Internet and Garbage was Difficult
Trying to find out who is right and who is wrong was not only time consuming, but difficult. Who do you believe and who do you think is lying to promote their agenda?
There were many different sites on how the 97% came about. So many lies, mis-information, false news and fabricated media lies. I have come to the conclusion that almost all media is suspect to deliberate mis-information.
But it looks like global warming is phony and it appears to promote certain politicians and people to become rich.
John Cook was caught falsifying his percentages by investigative journalists and these climate scientists wrote how he was caught by deliberately misleading his questions to get the answers he wanted to support these false claims. These reports have been hard to find and unscrupulous media and journalists keep reporting these false and misleading information.
Several climate scientists have written scientific investigations reports on what is actually happening concerning weather and they found that our global weather is NOT getting warmer - BUT colder. And that is the real danger - crops DO NOT grow well in colder climates. Is this being reported? NO- it seems the media likes to keep the fear of "global warming" going- instead of reporting the true facts!
Volcano's
It is also noted that although some scientists say that people are changing climate –
Others--------
are stating people don’t affect the climate on a global scale like ‘volcano’s’! When they erupt they can change our climate and it is agreed among scientists that what people do -
doesn’t come close to the output of a volcano.
Old-timers are unfazed by global warming or cooling. They endured the summers of 1934-1936, the hottest, driest and windy in modern American history, without air conditioning.
Dark Winter
In fact John Casey, a former White House national space shuttle engineer tells the truth about ominous changes taking place in the climate and the sun.
What he Is saying is just the opposite.
Check out his site, listen to his “Dark Winter” a 30-year cold spell that he predicts.
For more information
For more research and information go to:
Forges / Energy & Environment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#ebe22483f9ff
National Review: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425232/97-percent-solution-ian-tuttle
The Daily Caller:
http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/05/lets-talk-about-the-97-consensus-on-global-warming/
See John Casey, a former White House national space shuttle engineer tells about ominous changes taking place in the climate and the sun. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9c4rv2jz78
This content reflects the personal opinions of the author. It is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and should not be substituted for impartial fact or advice in legal, political, or personal matters.