Who Is Lying? Who Needs To?

Now granted the current Liar-in-Chief was in an extreme hurry to pack his bags, get a bit of shut eye and catch the red eye to Las Vegas for his constant, continual campaigning that has been the hallmark of his Presidency (I use that description loosely here). That was back on September 11th of 2012, not too far back and not covered by the Lame Stream Media adequately to this date. Finally got Hillary to some hearings where that political hack asked, "What difference does it make now" if four (4) Americans were allowed to be slaughtered by this pathetic administration. Ask the families of those slain for political exediency's sake you pathetic hanger on to the name of Clinton.

As an American citizen, voter and retired service member I want, no demand, to know the facts and all the facts that caused these deaths. I thought I had seen all the stonewalling, lying and despicable conduct out of an Oval Office when I watched the Watergate fiasco. That was tame compared to Benghazi. Obama lied, continues to lie, and people died. But that's alright because he is Obama? Horse hockey.

Obama is first of all a pathological liar followed up by being as fraudulent as a three dollar bill and capped off with being a coward. None of those three things are acceptable to me as a human being, not a one of them.

There were enough ignorant voters, or shadow voters, to reelect this phony. We'll save that for later. Benghazi was covered up from the beginning. It was an inconvenient truth during a reelection campaign waged by a coward. Elections have consequences and one of them, at this point anyway, seems to be that some of those exiting stage left are pointing the finger at where it belongs. That is on Barack Hussein Obama. How so?

According to Obama he was right in the thick of the decision making during the approximately 9 hours in question. That's an outright lie and testimony by outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Dempsey tells a different tale. So who is lying? Who has the most to lose in the lie is my question? I sure never believe Obama because when his lips start moving he becomes immediately suspect.

How Leon Panetta got himself hooked up with the likes of Barack Obama is beyond me. Panetta is known to be a man of honor and Obama is not. Somehow the two don't mix well. In testimony before the Senate Armed Services committee on February 7th both Panetta and Dempsey testified under oath that no matter what Obama claimed, and he did claim it by the way, that after the pre-scheduled 5 o'cock PM meeting that day of September 11th there was no further contact between the three (3) men. Or maybe I should say the two men and a boy.

Catch any of that information on your Lame Stream Media channels viewers? Now according to the two testifiers, Obama will obviously remain absent, not one person and definitely not Obama called to get an update as the men were attacked that night. Not one order was given by either the White House or the State Department. So what difference did that make Hillary Clinton?

Obama has repeatedly claimed since the probe began that he was in the thick of the decision making process. After all he is the Commander-in-Chief. In October he said, "I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure we are securing our personnel and that we are doing whatever we need to. Number two, we are going to investigate exactly what happened and make sure it doesn't happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice." That's hedging folks. Panetta's and Dempsey's sworn testimony directly contradicts what Obama has said over and over again. Presidents don't lie you know...

According to these two men, neither the White House nor the State Department were willing to act as our people were slaughtered. So Obama went home and the State Department sat on their hands. Isn't that great? No one was in charge as they should have been. No one did a thing to help Ambassador Stevens and his people, not the President, nor the State Department nor the Defense Department. That my fellow Americans is pathetic and dereliction of duty.

So as the smoke clears the parties, except for those who forfeited their lives, are doing the CYA routine and all are lying through their chops. No one from the White House, the State Department or anyone remotely in charge was in charge. People died and Obama lied and continues to do so. Best to sweep his continued negligence under the carpet I suppose?

Obama claims he issued directives that Panetta and Dempsey now say never happened. The State Department wants to know "what difference does it make" and all this was a reaction to a You Tube video? Just how stupid does the White House think the citizens of this nation are? Pretty damned stupid evidently. They reelected Obama to continue his damage.

"Like"It, "Tweet" It, "Pin " It, "Share It" With Your Followers. Time to let em read it and keep reading it.

As Always,

The Frog Prince

NOTE: It would seem that some still want to immediately stray off topic. I don't write for you to discuss, or grind your ax, about what is tickling your itch. I write to inform. Now if you would like to discuss the topic of this HUB let us do so. Otherwise please don't waste my time talking about something less current than the subject at hand. That isn't productive to solving any problems as they currently exist.