ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Who does run the world - Can you say Rothschild?

Updated on September 21, 2012
Source

CJ Sledgehammer, asked me the following in a comments box on one of my hubs:

Come out of WHAT My people?

"You made a prediction for 2012 by stating that there will be, "substantial political upheaval as folk wake up to who actually runs this world...."

You may be right, but who do you think "actually runs this world"?

I have my own theories, but would love to hear yours."

Your brother in Christ - C.J. Sledgehammer

Here I am going to give you my slant on who actually runs this world.

Nathan Mayer Rothschild
Nathan Mayer Rothschild | Source
Excerpt from The Times on Thursday 22nd June 1815, a full four days after the battle took place.
Excerpt from The Times on Thursday 22nd June 1815, a full four days after the battle took place. | Source

The day that changed the world

It was the morning of what became known as 'The Battle of Waterloo' which was fought on Sunday, 18 June 1815, and Napoleon was preparing to engage Wellington in what became the decisive battle of the 1800's, and the final battle he fought.

About 350 miles away in London, England a nervous Crown and Parliament awaited the outcome, but also the City stood still.

If Napoleon won, then England was in serious danger again, and stock values would fall.

If Wellington won, then Napoleon was no longer a threat to British trade and supremacy, and prices would soar.

One man, part of a banking family that provided the gold to pay for Wellington's army, and that bought the allegiances that provided the cannon fodder for wars, a man by the name of Nathan Mayer Rothschild, also awaited news of the outcome, however, as his family had agents all over Europe, this man had a distinct advantage, for he would receive the news of the outcome a full day before England herself found out.

There are two versions concerning what happened next.

One contends that Nathan Rothschild, having his superior (to the Crowns) intelligence service, rushed from hearing the news of Napoleons defeat to the Palace, and informed the Crown of the defeat, but they refused to believe him.

This version comes from the Rothschild's private research.

The second tells of Nathan Rothschild standing at the 'Rothschild' pillar in the English Stock Exchange looking downcast, and selling his stock positions.

That forced a panic in the market, and much as 15%-20% of the value of the stocks fell in about three hours. After they had fallen so low, Rothschild turned around and began buying.

It is said that he knew all along that the Duke of Wellington had defeated Napoleon and that the British market would go up. And when the official news came the next day that the British had won, the market went up 1000 points, making Rothschild even wealthier.

In either event, the Rothschild's made a fortune and ended up controlling the British economy and whether the Rothschild's version is correct, and their fortune was based upon providing the funding for the British Army, or the alternative version is correct, and their fortune was based upon criminal deception, the fact remains that after that event, the Rothschild's ruled the City and had strong influence over the Royal Crown of Great Britain.

From that day forward, they only grew richer and stronger.

In today's world, knowledge is power, and this article is written on a computer that is more powerful than the computers used throughout WW2, and delivered via the internet in seconds to your screen.

Nathan Rothschild had the 1815 equivalent, his network of financial spy's were primed to get him the result of the battle back faster than the British army were capable of doing, and it is said that his agents watched the battle and set off to give him the information well before 'The Honourable H. Percy' reached British shores to report.

In fact Wellington only sat to write his dispatch on the Monday after the battle had been won, (Rothschild's men were well on the way by then) then Percy was further delayed when the sloop he was travelling in got 'becalmed' in the middle of the English Channel, and the Honourable gent needed to put his Eton College rowing experience to work in order to reach Englands shores at all, finally arriving at Broadstairs, where Percy took a 'post-chaise-and-four' bound for London.

He arrived at Downing Street at 10pm on the night of the 21st, it is known that Nathan Rothschild had the information early morning on the 20th, the news broke in the Times on the 22nd.

Those few hours lead time gave Nathan Rothschild all the time he needed to first crash the market with his quiet but evident selling of 'consuls' (bonds which provided income payments in perpetuity), then when the market was down to the lowest point, equally quietly buying them back up.

Two versions, you decide...

Afghanistan's offence may have been pinned on them harbouring Bin Laden, but there was also the more viable fact that they interfered with, namely that the US wish to control a major pipeline they need, which happens to run through Afghanistan.

On February 12, 1998, John J. Maresca, vice president, international relations for UNOCAL oil company, testified before the US House of Representatives, Committee on International Relations. Maresca provided information to Congress on Central Asia oil and gas reserves and how they might shape US foreign policy. UNOCAL's problem? As Maresca said: "How to get the region's vast energy resources to the markets." The oil reserves are in areas north of Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Russia. Routes for a pipeline were proposed that would transport oil on a 42-inch pipe southward thru Afghanistan for 1040 miles to the Pakistan coast. Such a pipeline would cost about $2.5 billion and carry about 1 million barrels of oil per day.

Maresca told Congress then that: "It's not going to be built until there is a single Afghan government. That's the simple answer."

Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/sardi7.html

Libya.

Gadhafi’s plan to quit selling Libyan oil in U.S. dollars — demanding payment instead in gold-backed “dinars” (a single African currency made from gold) — was the real cause. The regime, sitting on massive amounts of gold, estimated at close to 150 tons, was also pushing other African and Middle Eastern governments to follow suit.

And it literally had the potential to bring down the dollar and the world monetary system by extension, according to analysts. French President Nicolas Sarkozyreportedly went so far as to call Libya a “threat” to the financial security of the world. The “Insiders” were apparently panicking over Gadhafi’s plan.

"Any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today, who are responsible for controlling the world's central banks,” noted financial analyst Anthony Wile, editor of the free market-oriented Daily Bell, in an interview with RT. “So yes, that would certainly be something that would cause his immediate dismissal and the need for other reasons to be brought forward [for] removing him from power."

Source:http://thenewamerican.com/economy/markets/item/4630-gadhafi%E2%80%99s-gold-money-plan-would-have-devastated-dollar

Whichever version is true, there is no doubt that the Rothschild's have wielded, and continue to wield, far too much power over world governments through their control of Central banking, which they have more or less singularly inflicted on our planets inhabitants.

Trying to usurp this family is a dangerous task to undertake, as many world leaders have found out to their peril, as they tend to get assassinated when they suggest that their nation should control a debt free currency.

In the year of 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild owned Central Bank:

  • Afghanistan
  • Iraq
  • Sudan
  • Libya
  • Cuba
  • North Korea
  • Iran

Notice any common denominator for those countries?

By the close of 2011, there were only three countries without a Rothschild owned Central Bank:

  • Cuba
  • North Korea
  • Iran

The others had all been subjected to internal strife and/or regime change, completed or in progress as we stand now in February 2012.

It should be borne in mind that Afghanistan is not a simple country to conquer, as the British, Russians and possibly the Americans have worked out.

A fiercely independent country based upon tribal boundaries, the Afghan will stand defiant to the last man when outsiders attempt to constrain them.

Mores the pity that the rest of humanity does not contain such vehement opposition to foreign intervention.

Iran is another country that has managed to throw off the yoke of foreign involvement, and is also at risk because it has oil, and defiance to international bankers and oil companies.

Long managed by the fundy nutters that sprang from the Ayatollahs mindset, the Iranians have already thrown out western manipulation of their country, fought the Iraqi's to a standstill and are standing off against the Americans as I write.

The inevitable invasion seems to be building up, but it is yet to be seen whether anything short of nuking them back to the stone age will beat them.

Cuba will probably fall when Castro dies, and his inheritors see the writing on the wall.

North Korea is a whole different ballgame, nuclear power, close to Japan, striking distance of many strategic interests and posseors of a fanatical army brainwahsed into dying to fight the cause they have been indoctrinated into.

The first attempt to subdue them was a miserable failure, though America did manage to segregate half the country, the next one could be interesting.

You see global currency control and submissive world governments surrendering their sovereign rights are essential to the New World Orders plan for Global Government.

So do the Rothschild's actually run the world?

I guess if we work by percentile rates, the answer would be YES as they hold an estimated 60% of the worlds assets (mainly gold) in their possession, but that's just a guess, and as they are the most secretive folk on earth, we may never know until and unless they are exposed and examined.

But that is unlikely to happen, because beneath (quite literally) the Rothschild's empirical rule, where they influence what's going to happen by royal decree and secret communications, there lies a whole plethora of ranks and levels of subservience.

It may seem strange to think that our world governmental leaders and leading financial scions of the world are 'influenced' by the Rothschild's, but I believe it to be truth.

There are three main levels of command structure below the Rothschild's:

  • Black Nobility
  • Illuminati (Freemasons/NWO/New Age, et al)
  • World leaders

Yes, the world leaders rank lowest in the hierarchy, they are minions doing their masters will, and they obey or get deposed one way or another.

So where does that leave you?

Well basically unless you have exited the system, gone 'off the grid' in reality disappeared from the radar, you are a slave to them.

You may well be a well paid slave with no knowledge of who you actually obey and are manipulated by, but you are a slave if you pay tax at source, have money in banks you therefore work for them, albeit by default, but still under their control.

The slave desires freedom, yet fears it in equal amounts, watch the video below and decide what sort of slave you are.

What sort of slave are YOU?

Where do you stand?

Where are you in this issue?

See results

Coming soon, if you want it...

Next, if enough people vote and comment, we will examine how that power is used to manipulate and deceive the people of planet earth, so comment or vote (or do both) and let me know what you say about this?

Your decision....

Shall I continue?

See results

Let's end on a happy note! (and don't forget to comment)

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • aguasilver profile image
      Author

      John Harper 4 years ago from Malaga, Spain

      Thanks James, always good to hear from you, and yes, like Ephesians 6 tells us, we battle not against flesh and blood, but spiritual powers.

      But we do need to expose those in the flesh who seek to manipulate and deceive!

      John

    • James A Watkins profile image

      James A Watkins 4 years ago from Chicago

      This is truly a fascinating article John. I do believe there is a conspiracy to rule the world through a New World Order alright. I doubt any one man can rule it, or any one family, or even if "The Jews" can do it. The conspiracy in my view is not of flesh and blood at all, but of course real men will be used as puppets to bring it about.

    • profile image

      o3815160 4 years ago

      I think the country of Dominica (not the Dominican Republic) was omitted completely.

    • aguasilver profile image
      Author

      John Harper 4 years ago from Malaga, Spain

      Fred, I agree, the whole NWO/Illuminati/1% Global bankers scam is a smokescreen, but one which most non believers are either not aware of or ignoring in their slumbers in the hope it will not affect them. WRONG!

      Like Jim Elliot said:

      God always gives His best to those who leave the choice to Him.

    • profile image

      fred 4 years ago

      God is running everything - those who chose to worship HIM alone enoy HIS assurance of perfect happiness, health and wealth. Those who associate partners with HIM suffer the consequences of satan's incompetence and fail the test. Google 'great feud in heaven' and you will get all the answers that make sense.

    • profile image

      fred 4 years ago

      This is a smokescreen

    • Rodric29 profile image

      Rodric Johnson 4 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      I did not even know about Rothschild interests until I read this article. voted up. Please do much more.

    • X-Con profile image

      X-Con 4 years ago from The Free World!

      Interesting hub. Although, I'm not sure if the Rothschilds are at the top of the list in terms of world domination. I've come across different lists and theories on the matter. The one that makes the most sense to me is of the Catholic Church being at the top and using the Jesuits to make secret moves to bring our world under their New World Order control (the Pope has stated that he is in favor of the NWO). According to that theory, the Rothschilds are Jesuit controlled and an agent of the Catholic Church.

      This is supposed to be so that the Catholic Church could facilitate enforcing the biblical mark of the beast on the world, a.k.a. subjection of the world to Catholicism by the enforcement of Sunday worship.

    • Vladimir Uhri profile image

      Vladimir Uhri 5 years ago from HubPages, FB

      Thanks for informative and interesting Hub.

    • profile image

      CJ Sledgehammer 5 years ago

      So noted.

    • bethperry profile image

      Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

      CJ Sledgehammer,

      of course I know they are Jewish. What I meant is that the family has had a running tendency to do business with some rather underhanded and at times ferocious people, people who have no compunction about perpetuating vile stereotypes about Jews. The aspiration for success and financial prosperity are good things, but they should never lead us to overlook the kind of person we're getting into bed with. This was my point and nothing else.

    • aguasilver profile image
      Author

      John Harper 5 years ago from Malaga, Spain

      Hi feenix and bethperry, thanks for the vote up!

      The fact that the Rothschild's are Jewish is relatively unrelated to how badly they have behaved in controlling world economics.

      Blame bible interpretation, which forbade money lending at interest (and still does in theory)for good biblical reasons: you cannot create additional funds (interest) from thin air.

      Something our current 'rulers' still ignore.

      Kings and Queens and the landed gentry tended to shun money lending, hence the Rothschild's cornered the market.

      Conceptually when someone 'invests' in another persons business, the way to 'reward' that 'investor' SHOULD be by returning an agreed share of the profits to the 'investor' (lender) and the lender should take their chances with the borrower.

      Obviously the higher the loan to risk factor, the more you may need to surrender in share of profit, but that is the basis of sound economics.

      I just added a video that explains that!

    • profile image

      CJ Sledgehammer 5 years ago

      Some people think the Rothschilds are no longer big-time players, because they are so well insulated and hidden by the main-stream press.

      Be well - C.J. Sledgehammer

    • Wesman Todd Shaw profile image

      Wesman Todd Shaw 5 years ago from Kaufman, Texas

      I get a kick out of the people who always say, "The Rothchild family aren't that important any more!"

      LOL!

      WHAT?

      Dude, that is economics 101 - it's virtually impossible for them to NOT be more powerful now than ever before!

    • feenix profile image

      feenix 5 years ago

      Hello, CJ Sledgehammer,

      I believe that what was meant by the remark that the Rothchilds have done a disservice to Jews is, as Jews themselves, they have committed a number of shady actions that make "their people" look bad.

    • profile image

      CJ Sledgehammer 5 years ago

      Bethperry:

      Just so you know, the Rothschilds (red sheild) are Jews. Their original family name was Bauer and according to the Russian government, they are worth 100 trillion dollars.

      They have also given a great deal of money to Israel, so I do not know how they have been doing a disservice to the Jews, as you say. Please advise.

      Best wishes - C.J. Sledgehammer

    • bethperry profile image

      Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

      I feel the Rothchilds have done the world and most notably the Jewish people a lot of disservice throughout the ages. In the end, though, they shall fall and so shall all the greedmeisters of the world.

      Very informative Hub, voting up.

    • feenix profile image

      feenix 5 years ago

      Hello, aguasilver,

      This is one of the most informative and enlightening hubs I have ever read on HubPages.

      Although I was previously aware of most of the information that your provided, there is much in this article that I was unaware of.

      And by the way, I had the privilege of hearing that speech by Malcolm X soon after he delivered it. And to this day, what he preached in that sermon underpins much of my philosophy concerning socio-economic and political affairs.

    • 50 Caliber profile image

      50 Caliber 5 years ago from Arizona

      Hi John, a well written, easy to read along history lesson that seems to have been over looked or forgotten. Today the media echos of groups who are attempting to rig a presidential election this fall. Maybe groups like ACORN and others are at the root, if so, they are funded and by who? should be the question. I hear echos of the Illuminati, and again who funds them and I could go down a list in this regard.

      This history marks the answers to who set the trigger for the assassination of all the Presidents and Bobby Kennedy who was about to mirror JFK's stance against these bankers, but that is quite disputable given many other "hate" connected theories of other conflicts of the Arabs and Israel. It doesn't seem likely that Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s killing was connected. I remember televised news at a time I was young and didn't get anything by seeing these broadcasts as anything but "shocking" and filled me with questions of "why" that garnered answers from my dad that eluded to "I don't know" and looking back, he was not into politics, but into "God gives us the leaders we deserve" and at my age that statement just left me confused.

      I'm less confused today and you have put forth a scenario of why obama has no life history and that Andrew Brightbart who announced that obama would be vetted this election and alluded to having the information to do it, fell dead and a 2 hour autopsy answered "heart attack". A thing that can be produced by assassins in many ways chemically that are hard to find if not looked for. This was in the wake of Whitney Huston who had "known" drug prescriptions suddenly died at 48 and the autopsy was a two week endeavor.

      Why the difference? One can only guess; myself being a person who looks from a conspiracy angle of the powerful to squash any thing or person who gets in their way.

      I believe that the winner of the election has already been decided, that leaves me right where I need to be, property of Jesus Christ and accepting him as my one and only leader.

      With that thought I've no reason to bother with voting. All in all America is a prideful nation, but it also provides some part of relief in disasters around the world and at home. It's confusing on how to think of it. I have to leave that with the Father and Son who allow things to take place and draw the line as to how far it can go and I think of Job and his story where the line was drawn at satan not going past taking his life and later he was restored to his life and a larger abundance.

      We have been promised in keeping our faith refusing the mark of the beast that even the loss of our life we will be restored to a better place than we can imagine.

      I'd read it, if you'll write it, I found this a great demonstration as to how the advocates of satan operate behind the curtain by trickery and lies. I believe all this has to take place before the 2nd coming of Christ.

      Peace, Blessings and Love,

      dusty

    • aguasilver profile image
      Author

      John Harper 5 years ago from Malaga, Spain

      CJ, thanks for the return visit,the quote "I think I may have just destroyed my country." has been proven so very true!

      Will, thanks for your input, also very true.

      Guess I will try to start part two!

    • profile image

      CJ Sledgehammer 5 years ago

      When Woodrow Wilson agreed to allow the Federal Reserve, which is just an international banking cartel, to sink its filthy talons into the flesh of the American eagle in 1913, he said, "I think I may have just destroyed my country."

      Indeed, no foreign army could have done the damage to America that bankers and lawyers have done.

    • WillStarr profile image

      WillStarr 5 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      Our own Federal Reserve was the creation of Paul Moritz Warburg, born in Germany of a banking family allied with the Rothschilds.

      That replaced our US Treasury system with a private bank which now controls the value of our US currency.

    • aguasilver profile image
      Author

      John Harper 5 years ago from Malaga, Spain

      Thanks CJ, part two will follow when I have time!

      To examine the power structure that drives the machine.

    • profile image

      CJ Sledgehammer 5 years ago

      Excellent work, John, I couldn't wait for you to write this juicy little nugget, so I kept checking in every day to see if you had posted it.

      What can I say, everything you wrote here is what I came away believing after my own intense research. I do believe Sir Rothschild did use deceit in order to gain. But the Bible asks us what it profits a man to gain the whole world but to lose his soul.

      Yes, the Rothschilds determine how much gold is worth on the world market three times each day. Yes, the Rothschilds hold 40% of the seats on the Federal Reserve. Yes, the Rothschilds own Bank of America and JP Morgan and a host of other financial institutions.

      It is even speculated by the Russian government that family Rothschilds have amassed a fortune nearing 100 trillion dollars, with the Rockefellers coming in a distant second at 12 trillion.

      If money is power, then these are the most powerful people on earth and whatever goes on politically and economically, must either be by their hand or by their decree. As FDR said, "Nothing in politics is a coincidence; if it happened, it was planned that way."

      The only question is whether the Almighty will allow them to play out this dubious little charade.

      Well done, John, well done! Voted up and awesome!

      Best wishes and be well, my friend - C.J. Sledgehammer

    • aguasilver profile image
      Author

      John Harper 5 years ago from Malaga, Spain

      Hi Dave, Time will tell HOW rough this will get, I warrant a major financial and spiritual change this year, then the 'gloves' will be off, and it's likely that anyone needing any government service or assistance will need to 'demonstrate' that they are in the 'program', which is when we will be deciding on whether to take the mark or serve the Lord.

      Too many folk who are reliant upon their three square a day and home comforts may decide that taking the mark makes more sense.

      Living as an 'outlaw' is difficult for those who have not had years to learn the ropes and who have come to TRUST God to get you out of the mire.

    • Dave Mathews profile image

      Dave Mathews 5 years ago from NORTH YORK,ONTARIO,CANADA

      John: This NWO is a poor substitute for Christ Jesus and His teachings. A true Christian will see through their facade and avoid them like the plague. True the weak could get sucked in but if they ask for our help through God's knowledge imparted to us the faithful, they could weather the storm.

      I pray that God steps in before things get too bad.

    • aguasilver profile image
      Author

      John Harper 5 years ago from Malaga, Spain

      Dave, you are correct of course, God has the final say, but my thinking is that God has approved this NWO scenario and will let it run it's course, and when it has completed it's cycle, He will 'pull the plug', by which time ALL will have been 'tested' and decided which 'team' they will be on.

      It will take REAL faith and TRUST in God to get through the closing stages of this NWO plot without 'selling out' to the system.

      Thanks for commenting.

      BTW I suspect that there is confusion about the poll question concerning House Negroes verses Field Negroes, speaking personally, I feel that the Master is the NWO (Rothschild's) and I identify with the Field Negroes, but that's a personal opinion only!

    • Dave Mathews profile image

      Dave Mathews 5 years ago from NORTH YORK,ONTARIO,CANADA

      Brother John: Nicely done! This is indeed a very appropriate question to ask. Your question, "Who does run the world?" is of course a "Rhetorical Question".

      Of course Almighty God runs the world, but he permits a modicum of latitude to satan, who thinks he is in control. God permits satan certain ground in his attempt to tempt and corrupt mankind, but God and God alone has the power to draw the line in the sand and say "Thus Far But No Farther" God always has a "Back Door" for those who do not wish satan's lies to trip up his people, the "Back Door" is Jesus.

      God permits satan the illusion of power for satan, as well as for those who would choose satan, but as we all know, that is but smoking mirrors.

    • aguasilver profile image
      Author

      John Harper 5 years ago from Malaga, Spain

      Thanks for your comments skye2day, and of course you are correct, the real force behind the whole thing is the enemy, and most folk are in ignorance or denial of the true facts.

      Part Two will cover more of that ground, when it's written!

    • skye2day profile image

      skye2day 5 years ago from Rocky Mountains

      Aqua Your words are truth. Greed and power rein for now. Satan is the ruler of this world. He comes to steal kill destroy. He is defeated by the blood shed on Calvary and he is going down one day.

      Many in the system I believe are naïve to it and decieved and blinded. Many are aware of what is going and stuck and stay out of fear or greed. Many are keen on what is going on and part of the design, wicked. There is much more going on under our feet then most know. Spiritual warfare brother.

      I can relate to your writing and God has used you to reveal truths. You made tit and tat clearer in my understanding. You did brilliant work here.

      Children of God keep on, Keep pressing forward. Share the Gospel Message of salvation. DO not be shy. Do not give up hope. Keep going.

      Thanks bro for putting this together as you did. Very good. Your sista in Christ. I am a slave for Christ. Amen.

    • aguasilver profile image
      Author

      John Harper 5 years ago from Malaga, Spain

      Thanks Brie,

      Rothschild-owned Central Banks

      Bank For International Settlements (BIS)

      Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan

      Albania: Bank of Albania

      Algeria: Bank of Algeria

      Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina

      Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia

      Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba

      Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia

      Austria: Austrian National Bank

      Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic

      Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas

      Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain

      Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank

      Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados

      Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus

      Belgium: National Bank of Belgium

      Belize: Central Bank of Belize

      Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

      Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority

      Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan

      Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia

      Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina

      Botswana: Bank of Botswana

      Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil

      Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank

      Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

      Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi

      Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia

      Cameroon: Bank of Central African States

      Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada

      Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority

      Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States

      Chad: Bank of Central African States

      Chile: Central Bank of Chile

      China: The People’s Bank of China

      Colombia: Bank of the Republic

      Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros

      Congo: Bank of Central African States

      Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica

      Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

      Croatia: Croatian National Bank

      Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba

      Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus

      Czech Republic: Czech National Bank

      Denmark: National Bank of Denmark

      Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic

      East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank

      Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador

      Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt

      El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador

      Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States

      Estonia: Bank of Estonia

      Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia

      European Union: European Central Bank

      Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji

      Finland: Bank of Finland

      France: Bank of France

      Gabon: Bank of Central African States

      The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia

      Georgia: National Bank of Georgia

      Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank

      Ghana: Bank of Ghana

      Greece: Bank of Greece

      Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala

      Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

      Guyana: Bank of Guyana

      Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti

      Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras

      Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority

      Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank

      Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland

      India: Reserve Bank of India

      Indonesia: Bank Indonesia

      Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran

      Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq

      Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland

      Israel: Bank of Israel

      Italy: Bank of Italy

      Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica

      Japan: Bank of Japan

      Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan

      Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan

      Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya

      Korea: Bank of Korea

      Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait

      Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic

      Latvia: Bank of Latvia

      Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon

      Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho

      Libya: Central Bank of Libya

      Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania

      Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg

      Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao

      Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia

      Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar

      Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi

      Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia

      Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

      Malta: Central Bank of Malta

      Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius

      Mexico: Bank of Mexico

      Moldova: National Bank of Moldova

      Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia

      Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro

      Morocco: Bank of Morocco

      Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique

      Namibia: Bank of Namibia

      Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal

      Netherlands: Netherlands Bank

      Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles

      New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand

      Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua

      Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

      Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria

      Norway: Central Bank of Norway

      Oman: Central Bank of Oman

      Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan

      Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea

      Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay

      Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru

      Philippines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas

      Poland: National Bank of Poland

      Portugal: Bank of Portugal

      Qatar: Qatar Central Bank

      Romania: National Bank of Romania

      Russia: Central Bank of Russia

      Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda

      San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino

      Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa

      Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency

      Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

      Serbia: National Bank of Serbia

      Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles

      Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone

      Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore

      Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia

      Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia

      Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands

      South Africa: South African Reserve Bank

      Spain: Bank of Spain

      Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka

      Sudan: Bank of Sudan

      Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname

      Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland

      Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank

      Switzerland: Swiss National Bank

      Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan

      Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania

      Thailand: Bank of Thailand

      Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)

      Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga

      Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago

      Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia

      Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey

      Uganda: Bank of Uganda

      Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine

      United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates

      United Kingdom: Bank of England

      United States: The Dirty Nasty Stinky Fed, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

      Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay

      Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu

      Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela

      Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam

      Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen

      Zambia: Bank of Zambia

      Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe

      Wake up sheeple, wake up.

      John

    • Brie Hoffman profile image

      Brie Hoffman 5 years ago from Manhattan

      Very well thought out hub! I thought Venezuela or Argentina (can't remember which one) was also on that list of non-Rothschild Central Banks???

    Click to Rate This Article