ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Pay What You Owe: How I Understand Racial Reparation and Why

Updated on April 22, 2019
jes732 profile image

Jamal is a graduate from Northeastern Seminary and writes on a broad range of topics. His writings are based on other points of view.

By Jacquelyn Martin/AP.  Many elite universities strong ties to the slave trade, owning or selling them, going back as far as the 18th Century.
By Jacquelyn Martin/AP. Many elite universities strong ties to the slave trade, owning or selling them, going back as far as the 18th Century. | Source

When I was kid in the 80’s, I remember hearing stories about racial reparation. I wasn't aware of what it was really, but I do remember many groups demanding that on the news, and nothing ever coming of it. Ever since racism was declared to be socially wrong and illegal, there have been demands for restitution to be paid to the descendants of African slaves. This was doubled down on by Native American tribes wanting the same justice, as well as their original land restored to them, and then by Japanese Americans wanting justice for the internment camps during World War Two as well.

Now forty years on, these issues are more sensitive than ever because of how touchy our society has become dealing with social justice and the problems they represent. And coupled with some American universities now seriously considering it. With regards to African and Native Americans, it has been centuries and the original victims are now long dead: land has been inhabited, built up, and deeply embedded into the national infrastructure. And how many generations is the debt owed to? Whose included in it:pure bloods or mixed?

The Japanese community is the only one that has seen any real payouts state-side, and that's largely because the victims are still alive and the crime was only sixty years ago. It's the same situation for Germany and their restitutions to the Jewish community. So there is not as many entanglements to consider and deal with. But should there be payouts for descendants of the victims of racism?


Courtesy of Washington and Lee U.  List of the names of slaves owned by Washington College from 1834.
Courtesy of Washington and Lee U. List of the names of slaves owned by Washington College from 1834. | Source

Those in Favor

Supporters scream a definite 'yes', because of the need to hold the institutions of the United States accountable. Many feel that to just wash our hands and say, ‘all is forgiven’ is letting them off the hook too easily, even if the individuals had nothing to do with it. Not to mention that we are still dealing with the ramifications of racism in our legal institutions as well: never mind the subconscious presumptions. Money doesn't erase the crime, but at least it's something, and it’s tangible proof that the wrong-doers are being held accountable.

They also argue that White people, including their descendants, have had these advantages over Blacks from the beginning. This is what is referred to as ‘White privilege’. Not only that, but the legacy of slavery in particular has left behind a constant, uphill battle against economic and institutional racism. This has created poor neighborhoods and harder circumstances that other groups didn’t have to deal with to succeed. This has been the reality for minorities since the beginning.

When the the angle of how other communities would handle reparations comes up, the usual response from supporters is that they don’t care. They need to watch out for their own, not worry about making everybody else happy. To be fair, this specific attitude is often shared by many other communities who prioritize their needs at the top of the list. So it’s not necessarily a malicious point of view.

Those Opposed

Those who disagree however, feel otherwise. As a culture, Americans have always had a unstable and dichotomous relationship with giving out money, regardless of the reason. The stereotype held by nearly all American communities is that success comes via hard work, and anything less than that is next to the highest sin.

Giving out payouts for people long dead is a pointless waste of time and money. Some of the questions above also apply here, like how far up the generation chain do you go until the debt is paid? Too much time has passed and it's not economically feasible to do a payout...etc. Plus, it is not just a matter of giving someone some cash, but where you are getting that cash from, to repay them? Even if there was an alternative to money payouts, like benefits and what not, giving descendants an advantage to succeed, whereas others have to work for it (in their eyes), comes off as equally unjust.

Finally, many are still wary about giving disenfranchised people money period, no matter how legit the reason is, because they don't trust them. Drugs, alcohol, or prostitutes are the first reasons that they assume why supporters want government repayments in the first place: ancestral injustice be damned.


"Not supporting race reparations is not about trying to make White people happy, which is often the assumption."

The Nail That Sticks Out

Personally, I do not agree with the idea of repayment. While I do think there needs to be accountability of the institutions that participated in selling and owning slaves, money is not the way to do it. I agree with the position that the people that its owed to died: my ancestors died long before I was born. But more than that, what they wanted was not money, but the freedom to make choices: to have a chance to succeed and be seen as human beings, not animals. I have that chance, as did my parents, grandparents and great-grand parents. I do not deserve that money.

If a cop pulls a gun on me unjustly, I deserve justice, yes. But not a pay out for something that did not happen to me: free money or not. Not only that, but I imagine every other oppressed group will follow suit as well. They have a history of legit suffering under American prejudice too. So this presents the problem that the justice of racial reparation may instead turn into a free-for-all that will cost more than expected.

Plus, the spirit of not caring about the effect on others for the sake of your own people I feel is short-sighted. There is a desire among individuals and communities to be totally-self-sufficient: not prejudiced or isolationists, but not dependent upon others either. However, what the last sixty years have shown us is that for any kind of major, public change to succeed, communities need to work together because of how large the problems actually are. Every action creates an equal and opposite reaction. And simply ignoring that out of fear of doing nothing at all, doesn’t stop those reactions from occurring anyway. Many plans fail because of having no preparation for these kind of reactions. From Counter-culture, to the election of Obama, all these changes happened from a sense of solidarity, even if not on all issues. Yet, in this culture war we are in, the fear of dependence is held equivalent to weakness and loss of identity.

However, there is an even deeper issue at stake here.


My Brother’s Keeper

One of the definitions of slavery, is a person who is excessively dependent upon or controlled by something else. The Black and Native American experiences definitely fall into that, but turning that around then puts us in the position of the slaver. By that, I mean that we are binding others to a service to us that they have no control over, and holding it over them the same way a master does a chain or a whip (via raised taxes to support the payouts). The defense for this of course, is that this is different because it's actually justified, and that any objection to it is again, merely trying to appease the criminal institution.

Its accountability-or payback- for a past wrong that was done. Those paying the bill however, will feel differently and many already do. Recently at Georgetown University, a student council voted to pay back the descendants of 272 slaves owned and sold by the school in 1838. However many other students, Black and White, are questioning the wisdom of this because of how it increases college expenses all around: not to mention the limits of where collective and individual guilt lie.

This is where much of the pent up resentment is coming from, with people feeling like they are being taken advantage of for something they themselves didn't do. While at the same time, also giving others a edge over them in terms of jobs, education, and finance in a market that is already difficult to succeed in. If you want to make enemies out of allies, that's a sure fire way to do it.

Not supporting race reparations is not about trying to make White people happy, which is often the assumption. It's about not taking advantage of an act of justice. I see the consequences of that becoming far greater than the rewards: strengthening our actual enemies’ lies and arguments, and isolating ourselves from the larger community we have to interact with.

However, this does not mean the extreme opposite either of doing nothing at all. Like I said before, the current consequences of institutional racism are very real and unresolved. So creating some sort of plan to acknowledge and handle the tangible problems faced by minorities is needed. While at the same time, cannot be created with tunnel-vision. Because more than Black, White, Native-American or whatever we are, we are all still human and this is still life. And both are notorious for doing things we don’t want to deal with or plan for.


© 2019 Jamal Smith

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Readmikenow profile image

      Readmikenow 

      13 months ago

      There were many blacks in the south who also owned slaves. Should there be an effort to track down the relatives of the black slave owners and make them pay? It makes no sense. In South Carolina alone there were 171 black slave owner, William Ellison was a black plantation owner in South Carolina who owned 63 slaves.

      https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/facts-about-slav...

      I can't support this as my family did come to the United States until 1898. We had nothing to do with slavery, the Civil War or any of it. I agree with Brad, the cost in money and lives and devastation to the country was more than enough.

      So, I just don't see a need for it.

      Well written article.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      Brad 

      13 months ago

      The Civil War was the reparation!

      But, if you don't think that was enough then go to the democrats that started the war to keep slavery.

    • Ikenna Pius profile image

      Ike Pius 

      13 months ago

      Brilliant article. I too do not agree with the idea of Reparations. I think slavery was an evil, but if a Black man can become president then perhaps any Black man can be anything he wants.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)