ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Democratic Party Superdelegates: Corruption or Brutal Honesty?

Updated on April 17, 2016

Superdelegates, officially known as unpledged delegates, have come under a lot of fire this election season due to their disproportionate support of front runner, Hillary Clinton. The Democratic National Committee, or DNC, instituted these delegates decades ago in 1984 in an attempt to prevent weak Democratic candidates from getting nominated by the voters. Instead of these superdelegates being elected by the people like pledged delegates are, they are allowed to choose whomever they wish to vote for at the Democratic Party Convention come July.

This is horribly undemocratic and unfair especially since these delegates make up 30% of the 2,383 delegates needed to win the nomination(15% of the total amount). Currently, Hillary Clinton has 469 superdelegates who have declared their support for her while Bernie Sanders only has a mere 31. This is only to be expected though. Bernie Sanders is running a campaign that aims to reform the Democratic party platform and voter base while Hillary Clinton is sticking with establishment politics. Superdelegates are comprised of elected Democratic governors, senators, house members, and most abundantly DNC members. Simply put, they are members of the establishment. Politically, none of them have much to gain by shaking up the system with a Sanders nomination. A Sanders presidency could inspire so-called 'Berniecrats' to start running for political office, which could challenge in-office establishment Democrats for their congressional seats. In fact, this is already occurring. The DNC chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, is facing competition from 'Berniecrat,' Tim Canova, in what looks like it will be a competitive primary. A Sanders nomination would only add fuel to the progressive movement that has ignited across the country. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is sticking with many of Barack Obama's policy positions, which are popular with the establishment, and therefore, this is the reason for the disproportionate support she has received from superdelegates while Sanders has received very little.

Hillary Clinton currently has the support of 94% of the superdelegates who have pledged their support while Bernie Sanders only has 6%. (As of April 17th 2016)
Hillary Clinton currently has the support of 94% of the superdelegates who have pledged their support while Bernie Sanders only has 6%. (As of April 17th 2016) | Source

Based on this infographic, Sanders doesn't even appear remotely competitive. Is there even any purpose for him to stay in the race? Clearly, his progressive movement has failed, and he might has well drop out. Superdelegates, however, are not representative of how the people of this country actually feel.

Clinton has a mere 54% percent of pledged delegates compared to her superdelegate count. Sanders' meanwhile, has 46% of the pledged delegates, a jump of 40 percentage points from  his support among superdelegates. (As of April 17th 2016)
Clinton has a mere 54% percent of pledged delegates compared to her superdelegate count. Sanders' meanwhile, has 46% of the pledged delegates, a jump of 40 percentage points from his support among superdelegates. (As of April 17th 2016) | Source

When pledged, or elected, delegates are solely looked at however, Sanders suddenly seems as though he may have a shot at clinching the nomination, especially with many delegate-rich states like New York and California still up for grabs.

So what's wrong? ...Or is there anything wrong?

There must be something wrong with the system if the superdelegates are so disproportionately endorsing Clinton. In fact, in many states that Sanders has won the popular vote, his win has been stolen by superdelegates. New Hampshire, for example, where Sanders won by 20 points, ended up in a tie due to Clinton's support from the state's superdelegates (Source). Even more surprising, Wyoming, a state where Sanders won by 11 points was transformed into a win for the Clinton campaign as all four of the state's superdelegates declared their support for Clinton (Source). Clearly, the superdelegates in these states are not in touch with their constituency at all. Something must be wrong right? Well, not exactly. Contrary to popular belief, the DNC (as well as the RNC) is a private institution. Next election, they could decide to throw out the voters completely and nominate the Democratic candidate purely based on the party members' decisions, and this would be completely legal. Of course, the DNC won't risk fracturing their party like that though. Instead, they've simply decided to include superdelegates to attempt to influence the nomination in the party's favor no matter what the voters think. So nothing is really wrong with the process. The DNC can do whatever it wants, so is the system really corrupt when the election process is intended to be this way? It may be wrong, undemocratic, unfair, and a slap in the face to voters, but it certainly isn't corrupt. They're merely being honest with the voters. Honest in that they don't trust the voters to nominate a general election candidate.

So the DNC is NOT corrupt, just... un-American.

Although superdelegates have never been used to flip the nomination, they do inflate the lead of Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders thereby making Clinton's lead seem insurmountable in the eyes of the voter. So no matter who you support, there is no doubting that they're giving Clinton a hugely unfair advantage.

So just because superdelegates are an intended implementation doesn't mean things shouldn't be changed. The U.S. was founded on democratic ideals, and those ideals have transformed us into the richest country on Earth. They should not be abandoned to allow the elite to decide elections for us. The last time that happened, the people started a revolution and won back their democratic and representative rights from Great Britain. Therefore, superdelegates should be done away with lest we lose our democratic rights and devolve into oligarchy.

Source

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Sanxuary 

      18 months ago

      The Super Delagates cost you the last election. Bernie was the better choice but the Super Delagates already had their minds made up before the run off and just like the actual election they ignored the voice of the people.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)