It is interesting that it was actually President Reagan who invented the "Buffet Rule." That's the idea that millionaires should pay at least the same percentage of their income in taxes as their secretaries (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whwCxpLRMmE ).
Ron Reagan, Jr., has argued that his father would not be considered a devotee of Reagonomics if he were just starting out today.
This makes me wonder: How is it that the House Republicans are aguing that they are doing what Reagan did--cutting taxes for the wealthy--in order to create jobs, when Reagan himself argued against it? Have we all gone loony? Are the Republicans right on taxes but wrong about Reagan? Or are the facts irrelevant when arguing your point of view because the ends justify the means?
What are your thoughts?
John McCain was arguing on the side of Buffet just a few years ago, when the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy were first proposed.
-- http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/us/po … l&_r=0
Those tax breaks for the wealthy were designed to get rid of the surplus that had built up during the Clinton administration, on the principle that if the government was taking in more $ than it needed, then temporary tax cuts should be instituted to trim the surplus.
The problem is they forgot that was a temporary measure designed to drain the federal coffers, and like a needle stuck in someone's arm to draw blood, at some point you need to take it out, or your surplus turns into a deficit!
The other problem being that the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy were implemented when the economy was booming, so they depended on much, much more revenue coming in than was happening later in Bush's term when the economy tanked.
If Reagan were alive today, the GOP would be lambasting him as a RINO for all his liberal, socialist policies.
Thanks, Greekgeek. That article that you cite from the N.Y. Times was quite informative. The part about Senator John McCain "evolving" on certain positions is interesting::
"In May 2001, Mr. McCain was one of only two Republicans — the other was Senator Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island — to vote against President Bush’s $1.35 trillion 10-year tax cut. On the Senate floor, Mr. McCain said, “I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle-class Americans who most need tax relief.”"
I'm starting to think that the salient issue in all of these budget discussions is the public's short memory for political events. So, why wouldn't you change positions if it was expedient to do so? Nobody seems to remember all that much about what really happens.
by Texasbeta5 years ago
I hate to just post a link and walk away, but I cannot imagine it being put more clearly.http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne … h-20111109
by ptosis2 weeks ago
yea or nea? Are you HAPPY! that the richest .01% get less taxes? I mean - they did earn it didn't they?Do they just work harder? Is everybody else just stupid and lazy? Hard work will only get you so far if...
by Jack Lee7 weeks ago
To be fair and balanced, here is my opinion on the Trump Presidency.Stick to the core issues that got you elected. Don't be distracted by the swamp that you were suppose to drain.Take care of the top 3 or 4 items in...
by Susan Reid5 years ago
Wow. 500,000 households making more than $100K per year and 7,000 millionaires paid no income tax in 2011.Do they consider themselves "victims" do we suppose?Are they lost causes who will never...
by ptosis3 months ago
federal income tax rates history, During the eight years of the Eisenhower presidency, from 1953 to 1961, the top marginal rate was 91 percent. (It was 92 percent the year he came into office.)What does it mean, though?...
by Scott Bateman7 months ago
House Republicans had 5 panels investigating Hillary's unsecured email server and another 9 investigations into Benghazi. In contrast, U.S. intelligence agencies have found:1. Repeated contacts between the Trump...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.