http://www.idahostatesman.com/2013/01/2 … erves.html
Pro-gun Idaho legislators are "disturbed" by an armed man roaming through the Capitol. Idaho Senate President Pro Tem Brent Hill (a supporter of gun rights) is suddenly scared about gun owners exercising their 2nd Amendment rights. Really? I thought allowing people to carry firearms made us safer.
I'm confused; doesn't it make us safer when citizens are armed? Why is Hill suddenly scared of guns? I don't get it.
I guess men in hats are extra scary. And signs, too. What will the pro-gun legislators do when six men in hats come and sit in the front row?
Seriously, if you read the article, there are several quotes from Republican legislators who have consistently supported the rights of gun nuts to carry their weapons pretty much anywhere. Now, when it happens in their space, they feel scared instead of safer. Why?
Isn't always easy to sit back (especially in the bubble inwhich our law makers live) and spout off ideologies, but when the rubber meets the road some will whistle a different tune....Maybe those of us who want some simple control measures hevr been handling this all wrong, I mean if 20 dead children didn't shake them to the core...Maybe we should have merely lined up picketing with our AR15"s instead of signs...
Dunno. You find ignorance, hypocrisy, and simple stupidity in politics on both sides.
So, just so I'm clear, where you do see the ignorance and stupidity? Based on your previous postings about guns, I'm not sure.
I find it amazing that anyone would joke about protecting children that are on a field trip.
The problem was that no one knew who the person was or their intent.
Responsible adults do not create a situation where violence would result from such irrational actions.
The legislators are attempting to fix the problem by identifying all security personnel for the safety of their visitors.
This cavorting individual was definitely generating a risky situation for all people in the building due to their unusual activity in the presence of children.
Had I been the security personnel on duty at the site, I would have detained the individual until the state police arrived and then swore out a charge of inducing a panic.
When asked who was paniced, I would have stated that I was because the individual was sneaking around with a weapon while in the presence of minors who could have been at risk.
Having disarmed irrational people in the past, this would have been a simple task.
by Wesman Todd Shaw 6 years ago
How Many Guns have you stared down the barrel of, or how many guns have you had pulled on you?Right off hand I can think of five instances in which I've looked down the barrel of a loaded gun. Have you had a gun aimed at you with malice or fear? If so, how many times? What...
by Susan Reid 5 years ago
Wow. 500,000 households making more than $100K per year and 7,000 millionaires paid no income tax in 2011.Do they consider themselves "victims" do we suppose?Are they lost causes who will never "take personal responsibility and care for their lives"Excerpt followed by...
by Jeff Berndt 5 years ago
I just noticed something about the Fast and Furious controversy.Leaving aside the question of whether the operation was a good idea or not (I think not), I noticed that the Left and the Right have both seemed to flip-flop on their usual arguments about gun control.The Left usually wants to restrict...
by HuntersWhitt 5 years ago
With all of the uproar over gun laws lately, I'm curious to see what HubPages thinks. So here's the question:A) What guns, if any, should be allowed?B) Do "gun laws" actually accomplish anything?
by Marian L 5 years ago
Why do Americans think their right to bear arms is more important than people's lives?
by phion 5 years ago
Thanks to the NRA and many other Americans, the second amendment has been able to stand up to this same kind of onslaught before. This same attempted correlation of individual’s rights to have firearms, and the acts of criminals will be brushed away for the irrelevant idea it really is…again.I...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|