It would be too difficult to change the Constitutional "Right to Bear Arms". But the law could be changed so that people would still maintain the right to bear arms, but only in their homes. There would be an exception for certain specified people, such as farmers or people who need to use guns, and they would need to obtain a licence for shooting on a specific day or days, and also be obliged to re-register each and every one of their guns.
There would be a harsh mandatory sentence of, say, five to ten years imprisonment for carrying a gun in the street. This would put legal pressure on parents to check whether their children are walking around with guns, especially if they are obliged to pay for their children's keep in prison, as some states used to insist. It would encourage parents to be more concerned about and responsible for their children's actions, especially if they were likely to lose their home if they had difficulty paying.
This solution would still maintain the right to bear arms in accordance with the constitution, but with just a small addendum of the words "in their own home". It would cure about 75% of the gun problem, and this qualified right should satisfy the Rifle Association, as they would still be selling as many guns, and it should also satisfy the Gun Lobby and those in favour of upholding the Constitution in its present form.
So you believe the only need for protection is while you are in your home? You've never gone downtown for dinner at night where I live. Also, if the intent is to protect yourself against tyranny, that does not just occur at home either. Your proposed limitations completely neuter the right to bear arms, which I suspect is your intent.
Do you believe that a murderer would obtain this license?
This is far from a "small adendum." Would it be a "small adendum" if Congress passed a law saying that you could only have freedom of speech in your own home?
The problems I see with that:
1 - It ignores the actual reasoning for the 2A, which is to allow citizens to protect themselves personally, and as a group.
2 - It wouldn't actually make a difference. Criminals carry guns illegally all the time, why would making them more illegal stop 75% of gun crime?
So you want to leave people unarmed and helpless everywhere except in their homes.
And who would finance and run this enormous bureaucratic nightmare making sure that people only shoot on 'specific days'? The money has to come from someplace. And we as a nation are broke already.
Your ideas, while going against the 2nd amendments purpose anyhow, would never work in even most Utopian world.
If gun control works, why did Chicago lead the nation in murders last year?
by Charlotte Gerber17 months ago
Should U.S. citizens continue to be able to have guns (assuming they carry a permit)? Hillary Clinton doesn't think so. There are several sides to this argument. One consideration should be that certain...
by leeberttea7 years ago
... to carry regardless of state or local laws?I think the Supreme Court will rule today that Americans, all Americans have the constitutional right to carry guns and states and cities can not limit that right! This is...
by Alem Belton3 years ago
Okay so another guy dresses up like The Joker and kills people. I will resist the urge to state how bizarre and coincidental that is and stick to the question.The media is intent on showing Americans all the LEGAL...
by cwoodman2076 years ago
Say we no longer have the right to bare arms. The government is doing a sweep collecting all registered firearms. Would you allow your right to go down the river or would you stand up to the regime and refuse? Either...
by jgrimes33121 months ago
Do you think the founding fathers of America; in consideration to AK-47's, assault weapons and handguns, would have reconsidered there position to NOT include the 2nd Amendment in the American Constitution? If we...
by Castlepaloma4 years ago
We all need licenses and insurance for a car, or home, even our dog and many of our jobs needs license and none were design to kill.About 80% of Americans own guns, but that's not enough. Do we really need more guns in...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.