|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Can computer technology / internet create a more democratic world?
Can the internet make democracy more possible in any country?
Can the US do away with the electoral college in favor of one man one vote via the internet?
Great idea but how do you monitor the security of it. The government?
The electoral college, like Congress, is designed to keep the big population states from assuming majority rule tyranny. Would you like the big city coastal states to dictate terms to all the other states?
That is a very good point! The necessity to get out and vote is the only thing that makes it fair. One thing the politicians have not been able to eliminate is the vote. They have gerrymandered it and discounted it but the numbers cannot be overcome in the grand scheme of things. Why is it so many give up on the one thing that makes it fair?.
Today almost bottom line democracy - the ability to vote, worldwide is done directly and indirectly with currency. However we probably do not realize who we support with that vote. Cause there to be democratic governments is a whole different concept. The vast majority of nations are republics and many to most already have an electoral process for heads of states. The democratic process thrives today really with governments. Even Russia votes on the president and it is a popular vote system. But, the prime minister is appointed by the president. How fair are other nations elections? I dun'no . . .
Dump the electoral college maybe yes. Through the internet to vote I really do not think so. How the electoral college votes is regulated by individual states. It can get confusing. Some are by state law with or without party pledges and some with no legal requirements. I just learned that today and still do not understand it fully.
Would you really want to trust a national election to the people who brought you healthcare.gov?? Not me sister, not in a million years.
I say paper ballots that can be physically traced are the only way to go, and with that voter iD laws in all 50 (not 57 Barack) states. You want to vote? Show valid proof you are a citizen and eligible to cast a vote.
One man/woman, one vote, ONE time!!!
Perhaps PC's can be used as a check by the people against certain types tyranny. For that reason might "they" take away our free internet?
But, what about the potential of the personal computer / internet access in providing greater freedom…which we now have? Isn't that freedom a great thing?
Do we use it in educating ourselves about candidates and political issues/problems/solutions? We could and we should. Do we?
If not, why not?
It seems to me that if anything, the internet being used within politics is a dangerous thing to do regardless how it is incorporated.
First off. internet security is not anywhere near the point that you could guarantee that the person voting is actually who they are - look at dating sites and FB.
Secondly, since the power would be in the hands of the geeks employed by the government, the possibility of corruption by altering results would exist.
Lastly, how would you like for the new President to have a list of all the people that voted for a party that was against him?
Terrorist now use modern technology like the internet to self-aggrandize and propagate their beliefs.
by Faith Reaper17 months ago
I may be a bit naive on this topic, but I believe that my vote should count. I understand the history and all, but I still think one's vote should count, and the candidate who receives the most votes should...
by ptosis5 years ago
"A constitutional amendment, which requires a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress (or a Convention under Article V of the Constitution) and ratification in three-fourths of all fifty states, would be...
by Mike Russo18 months ago
People are protesting President Elect Trump? Because Hillary won the popular vote by .3% Trump = 47.4%, Hillary = 47.7%, but she lost the electoral college. That means more people voted for Hillary's platform than for...
by Credence25 years ago
excerpt from a recent article"After back-to-back presidential losses, Republicans in key states want to change the rules to make it easier for them to win.From Wisconsin to Pennsylvania, GOP officials who control...
by Old Poolman23 months ago
The more I hear about this upcoming election the more confused I get.One of the so called "Delegates" even loudly proclaimed it was they who choose the next winner, not the voters.What if all Primaries were...
by Dan Harmon17 months ago
It seems that at least two electors from Texas have decided to cast their electoral college vote not for the man they promised to, but someone else.Christopher Suprun is one of those faithless electors:"That was...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.