Would the United States have become involved in the Viet Nam War if Richard Nixon had won in 1960?
Do you think that Nixon's peace-loving Quaker beliefs would have had any influence on his decision, (should a president's religious beliefs influence his decisions?) or would he have done the same as Kennedy? It's interesting to note that Nixon served in the Navy during World War II (but never saw any actual combat) even though he was eligible for exemption from military service because of his Quaker religion. What say you?
The Gulf of Tonkin incident would have still taken place, regardless of who was president. That was the catalyst for the USA to get involved in the Vietnam War. Who was president was irrelevant.
BigEddie, Nixon's entire platform was postulated on defeating communism wherever it lay. Why else would Kennedy come out trying to swing at Russia, Cuba and Vietnam? Furthermore, Eisenhower already had some commitments to the region. An incoming Republican would naturally continue with said program. While I take your question seriously, I must say that anyone familiar with Nixon’s undercover bombing campaigns couldn’t really believe that Nixon was soft on anything…Nixon was shrewd to be sure, but he was one scary SOB with Presidential power.
That is a difficult call but my guess would be...yes, at least to a degree. We had people doing "advisory" roles in Vietnam before the 1960 elections. The CIA was already alive and well there. We had some strategic military theories in use which dictate both our need to respond and our response to certain situations in the Asian Theater. One guiding principle was the Domino Theory which basically stated that if one Asian nation fell to communism so would others until the entire continent of Asia belonged to the Communist. We did not feel that we could allow that to happen especially in light of our allies in Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines. Secondly, there was the "Rimland Theory" which based itself on the premise that whoever controlled the shorelines of Asia would also control the countries within. So you have two major theories which are being violated by the movement of communist forces in the region. Kennedy seemed to be leaning away from further involvement but was being pressured to react when he was assasinated. Johnson went along even so far as "creating" the Gulf of Tonkin incident to gain greater war powers. Had Nixon been elected in 1960, I think we might have seen him take a more diplomatic approach but I feel sure that we would have eventually been lured into reacting in Vietnam for it was inevitably a civil conflict which was bound to play out in the same manner regardless of our presence or that of Russia or China. WB
I don't think that Nixon's Quaker background would have been a factor (as you point out, he didn't adhere to the tenants of the faith enough that he requested a religious exemption - in fact, he enlisted). If anything, given his anti-Communist stance, I think we would have been more involved sooner.
I *do* think, though, that if Kennedy had lived, we would have had fewer troops in Viet Nam and they would have been out sooner. After all, in October 1963, Kennedy had signed orders to begin removing the so-called advisers and had laid out plans for complete withdrawal. Those orders were reversed after his death a little more than a month later.
by Drew Breezzy 9 years ago
Good organizations to become involved with?
by Dr Billy Kidd 5 years ago
Foreign policy analyst Norman Bailey claims that all across the Middle East Shia and Sunni Muslims are fighting each other. They still are battling in Iraq, even after the U.S. spent $1 trillion dollars and ten years trying to impose America's version of government on the people there. The truth is...
by Sunshine Diaz 6 years ago
Would it upset you to see a good friend or sibling become involved with an ex lover of yours?If so, why do you think you feel this way?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 16 months ago
Do YOU believe that the United States government has become more intrusive in the livesof its citizens or do YOU contend that the United States is only creating more safeguards and protections of its citizens against impending harmful, even dangerous acts?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
How has Conservativism in the United States has become retrogressive, even veering to theextreme right? How has Conservativism in the United States devolved into a more retrogressive philosophy & mindset?
by mio cid 7 years ago
I try to think back and I can't remember a worse candidate than Mitt Romney.
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|