Is it correct to consider sports as an obstacle?
Between two countries when they have political issues?
It goes both ways. Not so much because of the sport, because sports are a common bond between peoples, but because of the politics.
Judging by your avatar you are probably too young to remember the USSR and their part in the Olympics. At one time virtually the entirety of Eastern Europe was under one leadership but there were many countries, like states in America. Since each country had a vote they could easily skew results. Also since the "State" carried athletes their's were basically professionals because they didn't have to make a living and could dedicate all of their time and effort to training. It was pretty much the height of politicizing sports.
But so long as politics is kept out of the fray sports are one thing that can bring people together.
I'm not sure I fully understand your question and statement. Do you mean sport becomes another issue when two countries have political differences, or it causes more issues?
Either way, I think sport can be an olive branch between two countries. In the early 70s, South Africa's apartheid policy was greeted with condemnation in Australia when their national Rugby Union team toured the country, resulting in riots at every game. The result being the exclusion of South Africa from World Cups and most other sporting events, including the Olympic games, until that policy was abandoned when Nelson Mandela and his government was elected to power. It was then sport that helped to bring the country back into favour. I consider sports more of a commonality than an obstacle.
There are two examples I can provide:
A positive example is the so-called "ping pong diplomacy" which refers to an event when the U.S. National Table Tennis Team received an invitation to visit China in 1971. It was reported to have marked a thaw in U.S.-China relations that paved the way for U.S. President Nixon's visit to China in 1972.
A negative example is the football (soccer) war between El Salvador and Honduras in 1969. Though the roots of this conflict is deep-seated and complex, hostilities were believed to have been triggered by violence among fans that occurred after these 2 countries played a series of qualifying matches for the 1970 FIFA World Cup.
by Savio Koman 4 years ago
What is the difference between 'atleast' and 'at least'? Which is correct? or are both correct?
by Felixedet2000 6 years ago
When you take a critical look at the issue of religion and world peace, you will find out that the main reason for violence in the world is based on religious beliefs.Religion instead of uniting the whole world has always been at the forefront of disunity.Sport on the other hand has been a strong...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|