Why is science so poorly understood by the general public?

Jump to Last Post 1-9 of 9 discussions (13 posts)
  1. TFScientist profile image77
    TFScientistposted 11 years ago

    Why is science so poorly understood by the general public?

    E.g. Evolution, climate change, gm crops, bioengineering, stem cell research.

  2. conradofontanilla profile image65
    conradofontanillaposted 11 years ago

    Science consists of bodies of knowledge and approaches in the accumulation of knowledge. There are forces prejudicial to science like astrology, religion, Big Pharma and manufacturers of medical equipment and conventional drugs. Some approaches in science are difficult to master, especially theory-making; that is, making of hypothesis and verification of hypothesis that graduate into theory. read more

  3. Shanti Perez profile image78
    Shanti Perezposted 11 years ago

    I get the impression from some people that if something's not interesting and presented in a way that is easy to understand, they get bored. Also, if they do not comprehend what is being presented, they tend to get frustrated. If they get frustrated, they stop paying attention.

    As far as evolution, climate change, GMOs and GM crops, etc., these are areas of science that people may not want to admit they have a hand in creating/preventing, because if they understand these sciences, they will have to change their habits and not be so lazy. They don't want to do that, you see.

  4. CertifiedHandy profile image60
    CertifiedHandyposted 11 years ago

    Because those who teach it teach in such a way to appear above those they teach. If everyone understood it would it controlled by specialists?

  5. profile image0
    scottcgruberposted 11 years ago

    I think the problem isn't necessarily with science or science education, but with a lack of critical thinking skills. This applies not only to science, but other areas of learning as well.

    Education systems may be too focused on teaching facts and formulas, and not enough on enabling students to discover knowledge for themselves. Critical thinking doesn't lend itself well to standardized testing, so in our results-based education systems it is not a priority.

    The problem with this focus on the facts and formulas is that it creates the impression of science as this ivory tower of learned scientists handing down facts to the teeming masses. This leads to the idea that scientists are conspiring to concoct evolution and climate science, or hide evidence of aliens and rogue planets.

    Science should instead be taught as a process of discovery that anyone can engage in. Yes, most of us don't have particle accelerators or mass spectrometers in our basements, but we can certainly buy a telescope or download raw ice core and genome data. It is a sad irony of the internet age that we in the lay public now have more access to scientific data and papers than ever before in human history, yet many people are using this medium primarily to spread pseudoscience and woo.

    Much of this, I think, would be solved by making sure kids learn basic critical thinking tools before they leave elementary school. The ability to evaluate evidence and separate fact from spin will improve understanding of science, civics, literature, history, math, and most other subjects.

    1. Shanti Perez profile image78
      Shanti Perezposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      I have this idea that critical thinking skills should be taught throughout a child's education, beginning as early as 1st grade. It would seem to me, though, that some powerful force within society does not wish this to be the case.

  6. profile image0
    Old Empresarioposted 11 years ago

    Organized religion prevents people from accepting evolution because it reveals the truth behind what has come to be a 2,000-year hustle. Stem cell research is also stopped by religion even though it has nothing to do with debunking religion. It is more of a team-building rally to celebrate arbitrary religious doctrine. In that case, the religious people got the spirit of a general moral case correct, but missed the mark. I think there does need to be some moral bulwark that stands in the way of science. If not, I am sure certain biologists would happily perform vivisections on helpless people and other animals in the name of private or corporate research. Given carte blanche to scientific progress and research can be as dangerous as religion. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb and they don't invent diseases. We do have to accept the fact that some geniuses can be apathetic and so socially maladroit that they couldn't be trusted with making moral decisions in the name of discovery or progress.

    Philosophical point aside, the general public does understand climate change--just not in the United States. We have the best universities in the world and worst public education in the first world. People who never went to college are susceptible to getting all of their information from TV, where everything is argued and politicized. I'd blame private industry for this, but industry is actually moving in the direction of clean energy right now. Again, I smell the Christians behind the climate change lack of information. If you go into any oil company, you'll find that it is full of either greedy Christian zealots or 80-year-old greedy dinosaurs ready to retire. The defense industry is the same way. Church leaders also preach against the notion of human-induced climate change. I don’t know why.

    1. profile image52
      hunter518posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      True religion never, disputes true science.  The Bible speaks of the "circle of the earth hanging upon nothing", and David spoke of God knowing him before he was born and parts of him being written down in a book....DNA? weather patterns described...

  7. Any Other Voice profile image60
    Any Other Voiceposted 11 years ago

    I think it's because for every fact that's out there, there's a lie...and most of the time, the public can't tell the difference. hmm
    I love to say "percentages are the ammunition of the public" because they totally are- you hear all these people spouting numbers that they never bothered to RESEARCH before, and it annoys me so much!

  8. KatyWhoWaited profile image81
    KatyWhoWaitedposted 11 years ago

    This will sound TOTALLY off the wall, but I think the structure a person's spoken and writtten language, as well as the syntactic structure of the spoken language affects the ability to think on the left side of the brain.  I have often thought that the vertical, pictoral dipiction in Asian languages somehow relates to the understanding of science.  Those who speak English and who understand science have a naturally more developed left side of the brain in spite of the language they speak; the rest of us who are English speakers need that spatial relationship, visual, mathematical aspect of our brains exercised more thoroughly.
    ...totally an intuitive hunch on my part

    1. profile image0
      scottcgruberposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Interesting idea, though I tend to think language works in the same part of the brain whether the language is alphabetic or character-based. We recognize words by shape, rather than letters, wchih is why you can sitll raed tihs snetnece.

    2. conradofontanilla profile image65
      conradofontanillaposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Sometimes intuition provides ideas for  concepts and relationships that can go for a hypothesis. Concepts and relationships must be tested for truth. If a hypothesis passes the test of truth then it graduates into a theory.

  9. profile image0
    Larry Wallposted 11 years ago

    Science is a very broad subject. If some research was done, it might reveal that some people are very knowledgeable in some areas of science and no so knowledgeable in other areas.

    We learn a lot of things in school--a lot of lot of it was unnecessary. I had to memorize the periodic chart of the elements. That is something that has never come up in conversation. Living in the southern United States I have studied on my own a lot about coastal erosion and weather patterns that deal with hurricanes. Many people are knowledgeable as to how computers work and recognize what they can do with them. I do not understand the details of organic chemistry, advance aspects of physics or even explain with any authority the Theory of Relativity. However, I do not think I am ignorant of science. My wife, a former elementary teacher, can explain a lot about how flowers grow, insects and other things that I once knew but have forgotten. Most people understand the concept of time and other forms of measurement.

    I think people understand what they need to know in their daily lives and what interests them. I work as a sales clerk, after losing my public relations job of 22 years. I had a deaf couple in the store. As a child I learned how to finger spell. So, I could say, hello, good bye and thank you with sign language. I have decided to start studying American Sign Language. That is not science, but it interests me. Someone else, may want to study the mineral content in their yards, so they can plant the appropriate garden. That is science. It is something that interests them.  Assuming that people do not care about science, is doing a disservice to the many aspects that make up the thing we call science.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)