The Prince Of Fools

1. 60

   lady_love158posted 13 years ago

   http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/ … secon.html
   
   That's Obama! How else can you describe those that voted for him? He was unknown untested inexperienced and a far left liberal that held contempt for America so much so that he ran on a promise of " fundamental transformation" of the country. Yet nobody bothered to ask change to what? Well now we know so will the fools return in force and reelect this incompetent radical? Let's hope not!

   replyreport
   1. 72

      rhamsonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      The article you reference is one of many that shows the author is another "anything but Obama" neocon.
      
      Articles By Lauri B. Regan
      •Will Ignorance Lead to a Second Obama Term?
      •History's Repetitions: "Never Forget"
      •Separation of Journalism and Politics
      •Power Corrupts
      •The House Should Curb Obama's Extravagant Lifestyle
      •The Complacency and Complicity of America's Jews
      •Obama's Foreign Policy Flies in the Face of Reason
      •Dhimmis are Dummies
      •The Novel Presidency
      •The Unwarranted Castigation of Israel
      •The Mainstreaming of Anti-Semitism
      •Hope amidst Threat
      •The Obama Zone
      •The Exploitation of Israel's Vulnerability
      •Obama through the Looking Glass
      •No More Rock Stars!
      •Do Democrats Lack a Conscience?
      •It's Time to Play Ball
      •The Intellectual Dishonesty of the Democrats
      •Planting the Seeds
      •Obama Is an Impediment to the Mideast Peace Process
      •Hit the Reset Button on Obama's Foreign Policy Agenda
      •It's Time for Obama to Get a Clue
      •Credibility for Conservatives
      •Civil Rights in the Age of Obama
      •The History Lesson Obama Missed
      •The Tin Ears of the Bully-in-Chief and his Comrades in Arms
      •Government Knows Best?
      •Liberalism and the Dumbing Down of America
      •Baseball, Hotdogs, Apple Pie and... Obama?
      •Alan Dershowitz, American Jews, and the Religion of Liberalism
      •Obama's Attraction to Human Rights Violators
      •Who Has Lost Their Way?
      •The Nature of the Scorpions in the Mideast
      •Can Holocaust Deniers Be Partners in Peace?
      •Land of the Free Because of the Brave
      •How to Lose a Friend in 100 Days
      •A Lesson from our Friends the Israelis
      •A Country under Siege
      •The Other Right to Choose
      •The Audacity of the Obamas
      •Obama's Letter to Ahmadinejad
      •Life in the Russian Underground
      •The Cancer known as Anti-Semitism
      •Respect for Life Begins at Home
      •It's Time for Obama to Lead by Example
      •What We Have to Fear
      •Obama is a roll of the dice on Israel
      •How the voters bought into Obama
      
      Could you please come up with a suitable candidate and something positive.  I don't like a lot of what Obama has done or the direction we are headed as he has about faced on a lot of issues and policy.
      
      Somebody positive might be a Ron Paul candidacy.

      replyreport
      1. 77

         Castlepalomaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         I would have preferred voted in H. Clinton yet Obama is stuck with a hell of a mess to clean up

         replyreport
         1. 72

            rhamsonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            The only trouble is the choices we are served up by the two party system.  The Tea Party should take a look at that and be careful not to serve us up the same nutcase fare we had in '08.

            replyreport
      2. 77

         Castlepalomaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Ron Paul along with Ralph Nader are two candidacies maybe too intelligent for such a corrupted system.

         replyreport
         1. 72

            rhamsonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            I agree that they would be good choices but the bought congress who runs the bought parties will not allow anybody to get in their way.  The Obama phenomena was a gasp of the American electorate to effect some change.  Unfortunately it has turned against them with the appointments of wall street and big business thieves who are out for themselves.  Is there really any public servant anymore?

            replyreport
            1. 77

               Castlepalomaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

               Who would want be a President?

               replyreport
         2. 60

            DannyMaioposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            I think you are soooooo right! Ron Paul is the most honest politician with absolutely nothing to gain. He is exactly what this country needs but the media will play him as a joke and the weak minded fools will listen and follow. even the republican s made fun of him. sad we have someone who really would do the right thing and people are blind and stupid. I also wanted Hillary and I know for sure things would have been better! Bill was excellent and she would have also.

            replyreport
            1. 72

               rhamsonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

               I agree but the press with their corporate mandates to allow them access to the candidates will never give an honest candidate a break.  They know he will eventually turn on them as their manipulation of the news sways voters away from the mundane stories and focuses more on the exploitive money scoops.

               replyreport
               1. 60

                  DannyMaioposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  both republicans and democrats do not want him, he is too honest and straight forward. I'm convinced most people are either afraid of the truth or just plain stupid. everything is right in their face and they refuse to see it? amazes me. the republicans have their abortion, and too high christian morals with same sex marriage, the democrats have become socialists and want to much government and fiscally irresponsible. If these clowns ran a business they would either be in jail or out of business in the real world!

                  replyreport
                  1. 72

                     rhamsonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                     I agree.  The problem is our fault as we have allowed the system to prosper in a direction that is counter to the common good.
                     
                     As long as candidates can raise humongus amounts of money with special interest caveates attatched to them they will continue to serve who paid them.
                     
                     Unfortunately Ron Paul will always be referred to as the former Libertarian.  That is to say he has a crackpot agenda as espoused by the media.

                     replyreport
2. 60

   lady_love158posted 13 years ago

   Not all of the potential candidates have announced yet but any of them and I do mean ANY would be better than what we have.  I like Bachmann though she hasn't officially announced yet.

   replyreport
   1. 72

      rhamsonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      

      replyreport
      1. 64

         kmackey32posted 13 years agoin reply to this

         

         replyreport
         1. 61

            canadawest99posted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Lady  love, when do you get your cheque from Rush Limbaugh?  Since you make zero on hubpages I assume he pays you well to spout garbage.

            replyreport
3. 61

   dingdondingdonposted 13 years ago

   In most other Western countries Obama's politics would actually be considered more center, and certainly not "far left".

   replyreport
   1. 62

      Daniel Carterposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      The only people who think Obama is far left are fundy conservatives. That sort of crack-pot thinking is pretty rampant among vigilante tea partiers who want everything changed but their own hand outs from the government. After all, they are the only people entitled to such things.
      
      

      replyreport