ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Rediscovering the Exodus 2

Updated on November 27, 2013

As mentioned previously, the Exodus could not have occurred in a vacuum, even thought there does not appear to be any other eye witness accounts or historical records from other kingdoms to confirm any such event of such a magnitude having occurred. But therein lies the first issue, the one concerning magnitude. What we perceive of having been a tremendous event of such significant numbers to represent the evacuation of all of Goshen, may not have been that significant at all. Although the Torah would suggest the exodus was measured in hundreds of thousands, we do know that the scriptures often used numbers metaphorically, often in an exaggerated nature in order to emphasize a point. Then again, they may have been describing the total after a generation’s birth in the desert rather than at the actual time of the Exodus. We do obtain a suggestion of the actual numbers from the Exodus based on the size of the Tabernacle. We know that it was built shortly after entering into Sinai in order to accommodate all men of suitable age for prayer. Moses was a strict authoritarian, so there would have been no excuses for the men not to attend the sacrifices and services. The children, women, etc. would have remained camped outside its perimeter fence along with any people that had not joined the covenant. Since we know that the perimeter fence was 100 cubits by 50 cubits, and we commit the first 20 cubits of its length to the priestly functions and altar, then we roughly have space to accommodate worshippers of approximately 10,500 square feet. Although it would be a tight fit, we can imagine 7500 men of 20 years and older standing upright within the confines of the inner court for prayer. If they had to prostrate themselves, then it would be with some difficulty but manageable. Even if we were to assign one woman to every man of that age, then we can safely assume there were at least 15,000 people of a mature age. And if that is the case, then we can also assume there would have been probably double that in children, from infants to teenagers accompanying them, or roughly 45,000 people at the time of the Exodus. Though 7500 men of age may sound like a large number, it would hardly be sufficient to go to war with, battling the tribes that inhabited the land. So there may have been a practical reason as well why Moses chose to stay in the desert. By allying themselves with the Midianites, he would have perhaps doubled this number, but against cities even that number would barely register as a threat. So Moses stayed a generation in the desert until he had sufficient numbers to continue on his way and then dismissed Jethro with his tribe back from whence he came. With this younger generation now grown to manhood, the numbers would have been closer to a twenty thousand man standing army, much more formidable, and with the offspring born in the desert, an insurance of future numbers to go to war with Moses was prepared to enter the land of Canaan. If they did stay in the desert for a single generation, then the total population would have been a multiple of the 45,000. Perhaps they averaged five children per family unit, then if that was the case they would be of a total number suggested by the Torah, numbering over 200,000.

Insignificant and Ignored

Would the Egyptians have bothered mentioning the Exodus of 15,000 slaves, the children not even being considered in the equation? Probably not; especially if their leader was a known renegade prince from the Great House as the Torah describes Moses. Like every other prince or Pharaoh that ran afoul of the gods of Egypt, their names were erased from history, literally chiselled out of the stone in which they had been engraved. And taking into consideration that the new dynasty wanted nothing more than to eliminate anything to do with the heretical 18th Dynasty that preceded their rise, it should be no surprise that there is no recorded history of this event. After all, the 18th Dynasty attempted to introduce monotheism into Egypt, a failed experiment as far as the Ramesids were concerned and it was their role to expunge if from the Book of Life. So any event where what they would have considered a continuation of the leprosy on their Ka, they would be thrilled if it voluntarily separated itself and passed quietly into the desert. The Pharaoh would have been grateful for this gift from the gods and would not have described it as anything more than the breaking of the curse or similar. There would have been no mention of Apiru, Shazu or any other slaves fleeing from the country as they had become undesirables, and beneath mentioning.

So the error of those looking for validation of the Exodus is the fact that they look for confirmation through the historical archives recording an event that actually concerned people. But as you can see, there was no reason or justification to record such an event other than by the Israelites themselves who saw it as the turning point in their lives. But what could not be overlooked were the catastrophic events described as the Ten Plagues. History would not have been able to ignore this had they occurred. If those truly were phenomena of nature then there would be a geological and possibly archeological evidence and recording of such events and these would be beyond dispute. In order to fully appreciate this it is necessary to have an understanding of what was occurring around this time. We must look towards the great Hittite Kingdom (1750-1200 B.C) which besides Egypt, dominated the known world. By 1750 B.C.E., the Hittites had taken control of a large part of Anatolia (Turkey) and established their first kingdom at Nesa, near Kultepe. The old city of Bogazkoy was declared the capital of the Kingdom and the name of the city was changed to Hatusa. Hattusili became the first king of the Hittites. Hittites used chariots against the Egyptian army for the first time in the history of wars and not too surprisingly, the Egyptians lost that war. Hittites used both cuneiform and hieroglyphic inscriptions so we must appreciate that this was not a barbaric civilization but a highly sophisticated one that had mastered the manufacturing of iron implements. By the latter part of the Late Bronze Age (c. 1400-1200 B.C.E.), Mycenaean civilization flourished in Greece and Crete but the Hittites controlled most of Anatolia and northern Syria while the Egyptian New Kingdom ruled not only in the Nile Valley but also in Palestine and southern Syria. Even though these three civilizations were in a perpetual state of war, commerce flowed over trade routes that crisscrossed both land and sea carrying cargo from Cyprus, Canaan, Egypt, Anatolia and Mycenaean Greece. Everything points to a bustling, burgeoning and flourishing multicentred civilization that looked unstoppable. In the scope of civilizations developing to this degree, the expulsion of a few thousand slaves was insignificat but even more so if there were other matters of a far graver concern.

World Catastrophe

But at around the same time of the Exodus,during the 13th century B.C.E. the great Bronze Age civilizations of the Aegean and Near East suddenly collapsed without any indication or advance warning. The destruction of the palace at Knossos which had been originally dated c. 1400-1380 B.C.E. by Sir Arthur Evan, a dating that had stood without question for a long time, has now fallen under recent review of evidence from Knossos. It is now considered more likely that the palace continued to exist under Mycenaean rule well into the 13th century B.C.E. Again making the timing of its destruction more in line with the timing of the Exodus.

Similarly, if we were to examine the events of a century later, all these great civilizations had begun to unravel simultaneously with evidence of their cities burned, their once extensive trade becoming virtually nonexistent, and large groups of people migrating from one place to another without any known justification. The Aegean raiders that sailed to the near east only to become the Philistines of the Torah are no more or less a displaced people as Moses and his people wandering in the desert were. And when the legacy of this catastrophe ended and the world awakened from under this spectre of terror, it had metamorphosed into brave, new world. Within the magnificent Late Bronze Age two new peoples eventually arose, which we know of as the classical Greeks and biblical Israelites. From a catastrophe came two people that would ultimately define Western civilization.

So let's assume there was a major earth shattering event (still to be defined) that destroyed the archaic Greek civilization, caused the Hittites to disappear as a force to be reckoned with, caused a mass migration of peoples throughout Europe and had its effects seen and felt in ancient Egypt. Then surely there would be some physical evidence of this cataclysm spread across the Mediterranean and thereby confirming it was of a magnitude never seen before by humans; in other words, a divine punishment in the eyes of these ancient people. For more evidence we only have to look at what archaeologists refer to as Troy VI which has been dated to 1800-1275 B.C.E. Troy VI was concurrent with the Great Hittite Kingdom and established its kingdom on the ruins of Troy V near Canakkale in the northwest region of Anatolia only to disappear at the same time the Hittite Kingdom appears to have been knocked off its pedestal. The city kingdom was abandoned following a migration of Indo-European groups from the Balkans into the region after a major earthquake devastated the city around 1200 B.C. But the coincidence of a mass migration for Balkan people at the same time this great city of legend was being destroyed would suggest that the migration had been forced upon these people by the same event that destroyed Troy. What may have been an earthquake in Troy, may have been a tidal wave in Greece, or an eruption elswhere on the continent. Combine these events and you have mass devastation. So as we can see, what was occuring in Anatolia, was also occuring in Greece and the Balkans, and from what we know from the Torah, was affecting Egypt as well. We also know that during this same time period, there were major population displacements and replacements throughout the region, including Cyprus and the Levant all while the Hittite empire was collapsing.These were not random events but caused by a single source yet to be determined.

Every event must have its epicentre, so where would this earth shattering event have taken place? From the Torah we know that the looking from Goshen, there was a pillar of light at night and a pillar of smoke by day that guided Moses initially to the Northeast, towards Yam Suf, or the Sea of Reeds. This would suggest that we should look to the northeast which draws our eyes to present day Turkey, the home of the once mighty Hittites. Karprinar is a volcanic filed located in central Turkey and it consists of five cinder cones, two lava fields and several explosion craters and maars. The 300-m-high Meke Dağı, is surrounded by the crater lake known as Meke Golu and it is one of the largest cinder cones in Central Anatolia. A volcanic field of this size if it was erupting all at once, may have also triggered the Mediterranean Ring of Fire to ignite all around the north and east of the sea. And with that much ash, smoke, and sulfur being spewed into the air, it had to have a long term effect as well. And we do get some comment from Egypt that something had changed drastically in that it was recorded that from the time of Ramses III (c. 1182-1151 B.C.E.) until that of Ramses VII (c. 1133-1127 B.C.E.), the price of an emmer of wheat rose to eight times its earlier price. Not until the reign of Ramses X (c. 1108-1098 B.C.E.) did the price drop, but even then it remained twice what it had been at the beginning of the 12th century. During this time, the government also frequently failed to pay grain and other food rations owed to artisans that worked on the royal tombs. These craftsmen staged strikes at least six times between about 1154 B.C.E. and 1106 B.C.E. because their grain allotments were months in arrears. It is obvious that there had been a major alteration to the climate, the soil, etc. which for quite some time (the biblical 7 X 7) or 49 years affected the crops resulting in poor harvests. Whatever the change, it predated Ramses III and would again have likely occurred in the 13th Century B.C.E. From the change of soil, moisture,, etc., it is suggetive of soil contamination from massive ash clouds.

The truth is we don't know yet the exact location or magnitude of this catastrophic event. But with science we are learning more and more each day that it did happen. And its just a matter of time until science does prove the Exodus and the plagues happened exactly as they were recorded.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Kahana profile image

      Kahana 7 years ago

      Actually Ilan, the ultimate point goes to Anan. You did exactly as he instructed. You read, you investigated and you have approached the Torah with an open mind to find an explanation that appears good to you. That is all he ever wanted from us.

    • profile image

      Ilan 7 years ago

      Set match to you Kahana. Kol hakavod as you have forced me to look up some Torah scholars that I never would have beleieved held similar beliefs

      The most commonly accepted translation of dam is that it was actual blood (e.g., Targum Onkelos; MaharaI;

      S'forno). The MeAm 10' ez stated the water of The Nile River turned into real blood, not

      just blood-colored water; it had the taste and smell of blood, as well as the same chemical

      and physical composition. A lesser known explanation is that dam was a red-colored

      substance similar in appearance to, but not actual, blood.

      Rav Sorotzkin (1993) cited the

      early commentator,

      R' Bachya (1263·1340), who noted that the water of the Nile River

      took on the appearance, taste, and smell of blood, but was not real blood.

      A similar point

      of view is taken by R' Naftali Zvi Yehudah Berlin (HaamekDavar) (1817·1893)~:

      Shemos 7:19) and Rav Avigdor Miller. To quote Rav Miller, "It was not blood that could

      be used for transfusions or for fertilizing the land, but the resemblance was close enough

      to sicken the spectators. A revolting miasma came up from all the streams of Egypt, and

      the people (who were accustomed to eating and feasting always) lost their appetite, and

      instead vomited again and again at the sight and the odor of the revolting fluid. Normal

      life in Egypt came to a shocked standstill; and thirst, now the first time in their history,

      became the chief matter in the land. Everywhere, the infirm and aged lay dead; and the

      nation groaned in the depths of despair."

      Whether the water of the Nile River turned to actual blood or a blood look -alike impacts

      upon why the fish died and what caused the befouling of the waters. Thus, according to

      Rav Z. Sorotzkin, if the Nile River turned to actual blood, then the waters were fouled

      due to the rotting blood. Subsequently, unable to live in blood, the fish died, with their

      stench adding to the malodorous emissions from the bacterial decompositions of the

      blood. The Malbim suggested that Nile River fish were cold water species and when the

      river was turned to blood, its elevated temperature lead to the death of the fish.

      Conversely, if the water of the Nile River only appeared as blood, but actually remained

      water, then the fish remained viable. Thus, as part of the overall plague, dam, an

      additional plague killed the fish and it was only the decomposing fish that befouled the

      Nile River.

      On the phrase, ''For they conld not drink from the waters of the River" (Shemos 7:24),

      Rabbi E. Munk (1993) wrote that although the term "waters" indicates that the blood was

      drinkable, the Egyptians could not endure seven days without drinking real water.

      However, do people really drink blood? Apparently, yes; the phrase, human hematophagy,

      describes the habit of certain societies to drink blood and to manufacture food items with

      animal blood. The African Masai apparently drink a liquid composed of a mixture of cow

      blood and cow milk and blood sausage is eaten in many communities throughout the

      world. Ritual hematophagy, or the consumption of human blood, is also known. The

      Scythians, a nomadic Russian people, drank the blood of the first enemy killed in battle

      (Wikipedia, 2007)

      If the water of the Nile River was not changed to real blood, what possible natural

      mechanisms were available to HaShem to transform the Nile River to a blood-like

      substance, eventually leading to the death of its aquatic life and to the emanating stench,

      making it non-drinkable. As a preface, it is important to quote Rav Munk, "In the

      miracles recorded in the Torah, the supernatural if often interwoven with the natural and

      the plagues may be defined as miraculously intensified forms of the diseases and other

      natural occurrences encountered in Egypt" Rav Munk, suggesting that the plague of

      dam, and of the other plagues, had a basis in a natural phenomenon, mentions the

      possibility that due to the presence of certain vegetable matter, the color of the Nile River

      changed to a pale red. Secular scientists provide various theories for the Nile River

      turning red, including the following: (a) the fall ofred meteorite dust from a comet, (b)

      volcanic ash fallout, (c) red silt, and (d) water contamination by the flageJIated protozoa,

      zooplankton, microfimgi, dinoflagellates, and/or cyanobacteria (Marr and Malloy, 1996;.

      Treviasanato, 2006).

    • Kahana profile image

      Kahana 7 years ago

      I don't know Ilan, if you look at a picture of Blood Falls, part of the Taylor Glacier of Antarctica, you will see what is preserved for all to see what looks very much like a river of blood if it was flowing and not frozen. You have to remember one thing, God is talking to men without the chemical knowledge we have today. He had a choice to either say, I'm turning your water to Ferrous Oxide or I'm turning it to blood. Which do you think He would have said to this uneducated group of slaves?

      As I also mentioned, the miracle was not so much the change in colour but in the knowledge that it would happen, thereby suggesting that Aaron could touch the water and subsequently it would be turning red. Foreknowledge is the miracle as I see it. Foreknowledge which would have given Moses the time to advise the Hebrews to fill their vats and jugs with water before the contamination occurred.

      Now since we all know that ancient civilizations tended to draw their water from the local wells on a daily basis, and didn't bother to store water since it was always available, not to mention the fact that the Egyptians didn't heed Moses's warning, so why would they bother to go fill every vessel on his advice, of course when they went to draw their daily ration of water, their pails and jugs would be contaminated from the wells since it would share the watertable from the river which had become contaminated.

      Makes sense to me since God is the ultimate scientist. After all, He created the laws of physics, nature, etc. Why wouldn't He use them as He desired?

    • profile image

      ilanb 7 years ago

      Hi, this seems more like a Simcha Jacobowtiz story, He claims it was Santorini in Crete and alleged destroyer of Atlantis/Minoan civilizaiton that caused all the troubele with the water in Egpt from 1500 miles away.

      1.Problem-Rusty water and blood dont look the same.

      2 The waters already stored by the egyptians also turned to blood.

      3. The Israelites had no problem as their water remained fresh.

      4. Aron was told to strike the nile, that would have been a god trick if theire were divers waiting with hoses to blow rustywater up real fast at the same moment.

      Friends Blood is Blood and that is exactly what covered the Nile that day that Moe and Aron came their knowing faro and his clown magicians would be there.