ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Religion & Morality

Updated on January 7, 2018
Corey Campbell profile image

Corey has been a student all his life but his cynical outlook comes from his external experiences and shaping his personality.

Objective Moral Truths

In every major religion, there is a list presented to us that outlines that which we should not do. Since they come from a god, they are seen as absolutist and should be followed to the T but this, to me, is unsettling.

Personally, I have a very consequentialist morality. I believe that whether something is moral should be based on the circumstances as much as the act: killing is wrong unless it serves a greater purpose (e.g. saving a greater number of people); theft is wrong unless it is for mere survival; assault is wrong unless properly justified.

If there is such thing as objective morals, who decides them? Even if there is a god, that does not mean we should trust him/her to decide how we should live our lives, much in the same way we don't allow our parents to do so. Surely, the objective morality system would be decided on by a group of elected officials to ensure the preservation of the human species.

As every major religion has a list objective morals, which set should we follow? All of the individual lists have their flaws and all have their advantages, For example, the Ten Commandments of the Judeo-Christian bible outlaws murder (surely that is common sense?) but also uses the first 4 commandments just to ensure that he is the only god that is worshiped, a purely egotistical move. The qu'ran is against adultery, which is great except it's punishment for such an offence is death. There are many more examples like these that can be found with just a brief look at the holy books.

Moses at the base of Mt Sinai with the 10 commandments
Moses at the base of Mt Sinai with the 10 commandments

Why should we be moral?

This question is posed to atheists like myself frequently and, so far, the best response I've seen was from the great Richard Dawkins in his bestseller The God Delusion: "Do you mean to tell me the only reason you try to be good is to gain God's approval and reward, or to avoid his disapproval and punishment? That's not morality, that's just sucking up". On the same train of thought, Einstein once said "If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed."

The main reason that we should be moral is reciprocation: treat others how you would like to be treated. The concept of reciprocation is something I will return to in explain where our morals come from but the best way of looking at its significance in morality is the survival of our species. If I do not kill people, causing other people to reciprocate that mercy, then in effect I just prevented the deaths of several people by being "moral".

In addition, shouldn't we be moral just for purposes of social acceptance? If it has been outlined (before Mt Sinai even occurred) that we should follow certain rules then surely, due to societal pressure, we should just follow these rules? I can't be the only person who questioned where people got their morals before this event, especially since people had exactly the same laws in their civilizations before the time of Judaism.

A Case Study...

In the Christian bible, we are presented with a wide array of stories of the same events, including the events of Mt Sinai and the Ten Commandments. Because of this, we see multiple versions of these commandments and are left to ponder: which moral model should we follow? To what extent does each account portray God's true thoughts?

For instance, in the bible there is five versions of the ten commandments which mostly have the same message but, due to their different wording, can be interpreted in different ways. One example of this is in Exodus it says "I am the Lord your God who has taken you out of the land of Egypt" which, does not sound like a commandment but is just another of God's egotistical moments.

Again in Exodus 34, God says you should "Celebrate the Festival of Unleavened Bread. For seven days eat bread made without yeast, as I commanded you. Do this at the appointed time in the month of Aviv, for in that month you came out of Egypt."

If in the religious texts of one faith, the morality cannot be objectively outlined: how are we expected to follow these texts as a way of life?

Evolution: the true source of morality?
Evolution: the true source of morality?


From everyday life we know that followers of any religion don't take every aspect of them seriously, especially since the teachings are often contradictory to themselves but even in the texts of the religions are massive hypocritical moments. For instance, in the Judeo-Christian Bible it states that murder is wrong yet god incites genocide of many people simply for believing in the wrong god.

In addition, God says in his commandments that "Thou shalt not steal" yet he tells the Israelites to steal the goods and plunder the livestock of their neighbours. With these blatant examples of disregard for his moral code, why should we trust him? He incites murder, theft, impregnates a woman without permission and asks for sacrifice of people including the virginity of Lot's daughters instead of just saving them with his omnipotence!

A video that I enjoyed on the subject of morality

A dilemma

When faced with objective, absolutist morality, there is multiple issues you will run into with little chance of avoiding them.

Firstly, if killing is not allowed under any circumstance and person A takes 10 hostages and threatens to kill them. You have a sniper rifle pointed at his head but the round will not pass through his body armour. Do you pull the trigger and kill him to save the ten? If so you killed one and saved many. If not: you spared one but allowed him to kill 10.

Secondly, person B steals £1,000,000 from a huge corporate bank without harming anyone and donates every penny to a charity that clothes and feeds the homeless. You find the thief by chance and have the opportunity to arrest him. What would you do?

These two situations are extremely hard to decide on if you operate on absolutist morality but personally I found it quite easy. I'd love to know what your thoughts are on this!

Purge: What if we had no morals?
Purge: What if we had no morals?

My final thought for all of this is: do we need morals?

If we had one day (like The Purge) with no laws, no morals and no reason to refrain from anything, what would happen?

In the purge it led to a more peaceful society on days other than Purge night but I believe it would instead just be chaos at ll times because killing or maiming would, surely, cause the perpetrator to become mentally unstable.

Again, what are your thoughts on all of this? Let me know!


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • AshutoshJoshi06 profile image

      Ashutosh Joshi 

      2 years ago from New Delhi, India

      Not on this subject mate. Thanks for the suggestion!

    • Corey Campbell profile imageAUTHOR

      Corey Campbell 

      2 years ago from United Kingdom

      As I said, you should look at all of this yourself from a more distinguished source like research papers.

    • AshutoshJoshi06 profile image

      Ashutosh Joshi 

      2 years ago from New Delhi, India

      But isn't morality already preconditioned for good and bad choices basis certain principles or norms. Not that there is hard and fast rule for everyone. But it exists nonetheless. I steer clear of such norms though :)

      I don't know, its often confusing with all these add-ons, do appreciate your response.


    • Corey Campbell profile imageAUTHOR

      Corey Campbell 

      2 years ago from United Kingdom

      Ashutosh, while post-rationalis ation is a tendency to choose things based on an inherent bias, consequentialist morality is more based on what is seen as right and wrong not just a personal choice. Post-rationalisation is different in the approach, not relying on an opinion on what is preferable but rather on what would happen as a result, going above the person making the decision. Personally, I suggest reading up on this from a psychology point on view.

    • AshutoshJoshi06 profile image

      Ashutosh Joshi 

      2 years ago from New Delhi, India

      Interesting, I am still stuck on this 'consequentialist morality'. Sounds more like post-rationalization to me. Thoughts?


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)