ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Why I Abandoned Replacement Theology

Updated on February 10, 2013
Source

I left replacement theology behind.

I once believed in and taught “replacement theology,” but no one ever accused me of it at the time. Since turning away from replacement theology, however, I’ve faced this accusation numerous times.

What is replacement theology? Matt Slick, the president and founder of Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry (CARM), says this on the subject:

Replacement theology is the teaching that the Christian church has replaced national Israel regarding the plan, purpose, and promises of God… [In] replacement theology the church has replaced Israel as the primary means by which the world is blessed by God's work… Replacement theology is also known as supersessionism, which means that the Christian church has superseded Israel in God's plan.

John Hagee, the founder of Christians United for Israel (CUFI), said this in his 2006 book, “Jerusalem Countdown: A Warning to the World”:

“Adherents of replacement theology believe that the Jews are no longer God's chosen people, and God does not have specific future plans for the nation of Israel" (page 72)… “Replacement theology means that Israel failed, and God has replaced Israel with the church" (page165).

Ironically, when I formerly taught replacement theology, my thinking was very much in line with Slick and Hagee. I wasn’t replacing Israel with the church, but I sure was replacing Jesus with the modern nation of Israel. I would have agreed with graphics like the one I saw posted on Facebook by a fellow Christian a few weeks ago (see the "Genesis 12:3" graphic at the beginning of this post).

This illustration epitomizes the replacement theology I’ve left behind. It takes the role belonging to Jesus and assigns it to a political nation whose population generally has nothing to do with Him. The New Testament is especially clear in showing that it’s through salvation in Jesus that the nations are blessed.

Consider the progression of Biblical revelation regarding the promise recorded in Genesis 12:3:

[1] It was first made by God to Abraham alone: “It will be through you [Abraham], that all the families of the earth will be blessed.”

[2] It was repeated again in Genesis 22:3, and this time expanded to include his offspring: “And through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed Me.”

[3] In Acts 3:25-26, the apostle Peter, speaking to a Jewish crowd in Jerusalem, is clear in identifying Abraham’s offspring and the means of blessing for the nations:

And you are heirs of the prophets and of the covenant God made with your fathers. He said to Abraham, ‘Through your offspring all peoples on earth will be blessed.’ When God raised up His servant, He sent Him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.”

It’s Jesus who is Abraham’s offspring, and He blesses the nations, beginning with the proclamation of the gospel to Jews in the first century.

[4] The apostle Paul, in Galatians 3:7-8, declared that Jesus’ followers are Abraham’s offspring too:

Understand, then, that those who believe are children of Abraham. The Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, and announced the gospel in advance to Abraham: ‘All nations will be blessed through you.’”

According to the terms laid out by Matt Slick and John Hagee, the apostles Peter and Paul were guilty of teaching replacement theology. Yet according to Peter and Paul, when it comes to God’s plans, purpose, and promises, Slick and Hagee are seeking to replace Jesus and His church with a geopolitical nation located in the Middle East. It’s highly ironic that Christians are comfortable with the idea of replacing Christ (their Savior) with a mere political nation, but are up in arms with those who allegedly replace Israel with the church.

Galatians 3, incidentally, goes on to make the point even more strongly that all of God’s promises are wrapped up first in Jesus and second in His followers. Paul says this in verse 16:

The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say ‘and to seeds,’ meaning many people, but ‘and to your seed,’ meaning one person, who is Christ.”

Jesus is singularly the recipient of all of God’s promises, and He extends those promises to His followers (verse 29), who are all one in Him regardless of ethnicity, societal status, or gender (verse 28):

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.” (Galatians 3:28-29)

Does Paul leave any room for those who are outside of Christ to be heirs of the promises? No, he doesn’t, not even for Jews who are outside of Christ. Neither did Peter (Acts 3:23), and neither did Jesus (e.g. Matthew 8:10-12, Matthew 21:43, John 8:31-47).As Paul says in II Corinthians 1:20, all of God’s promises are “yes” and “amen” in Jesus. What are they outside of Jesus? Meaningless and void.

One of my questions for Slick and Hagee is this: If God’s plan, purpose, and promises are waiting for the nation of Israel to carry them out, then did God utterly abandon the world between 70 AD and 1948 when there was no nation of Israel? Or is it not possible that God’s plan, purpose, and promises continued to be carried out by true Israel, Jesus and His church?

Consider also what Paul said to the Roman church: “A person is not a Jew who is one only outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and physical. No, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit…” (Romans 2:28-29). “For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring… This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring” (Romans 9:6-8).

The church is Israel, that is, the Israel of God (Galatians 6:16). This is only true because Jesus is true Israel, and we who belong to Christ are made one with Him. One more example of each of these points will suffice. First we will look at how Matthew takes what was once said about the nation of Israel, and applies it to Jesus. Then, finally, we will look at how Peter takes what was once said of the nation of Israel, and applies it to the church.

[1] In Exodus 4:22, God instructs Moses to say to Pharaoh, “Thus says the Lord, ‘Israel is My firstborn son, and I say to you, “Let My son go that he may serve Me.”’” Then in Hosea 11:1-2 we read, “When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son. The more they were called, the more they went away; they kept sacrificing to the Baals and burning offerings to idols.” Who is Israel in these Old Testament texts? Clearly it’s that ancient nation, known as Israel, which was finally destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD.

Yet look at how Matthew treats this same statement. To set the background, an angel has warned Joseph, the father of Jesus, to flee to Egypt with his family, because Herod would seek to destroy Jesus: “And he [Joseph] rose and took the child [Jesus] and His mother by night and departed to Egypt and remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet, ‘Out of Egypt I called My son’” (Matthew 2:14-15).

Only 40 verses into the New Testament, Matthew declares, by strong implication, that Jesus is true Israel.

[2] Compare what Moses spoke to “the people of Israel” (Exodus 19:3) to what Peter said was true of the church. It’s impossible to miss the parallel language, and I have letter-coded the parallels (A, B, and C):

To ancient national Israel: “Now therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, you shall be [A] MY TREASURED POSSESSION among all peoples, for all the earth is mine; and you shall be to Me [B] A KINGDOM OF PRIESTS and a [C] HOLY NATION…” (Exodus 19:5-6).

To the church: “But you are a chosen race, [B] A ROYAL PRIESTHOOD, a [C] HOLY NATION, a people [A] FOR HIS OWN POSSESSION, that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light. Once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people…” (I Peter 2:9-10).

Peter leaves no doubt that Christ’s followers are chosen for the same purpose for which the nation of Israel was once chosen.

I abandoned replacement theology because Jesus is irreplaceable, and I love His church.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • searchinsany profile image

      Alexander Gibb 4 years ago from UK

      Welcome to HubPages, this is a very interesting Hub. I look forward to reading more.

    • AdamMaarschalk profile image
      Author

      Adam Maarschalk 4 years ago from Bowling Green, Ohio

      Thanks, brother!

    • profile image

      michael 3 years ago

      great teaching, i have friends who now worship a piece of real estate in the middle east more than jesus

    • profile image

      George 3 years ago

      he is not a jew which is one outwardly but he is a jew which is one inwardly

      sorry but it does not get any clear than that. thank god for the new covenant

    • profile image

      rakovsky 3 years ago

      What an interesting post. I am glad to hear that you believed in Replacement Theology because it shows you are familiar with Christian views and are able to change yours. I propose to you that Replacement Theology is one valid, correct way to look at Christianity, while the alternative is also valid.

      That is, since all people are chosen by God, God has replaced one group with all groups. He has replaced a focus on one nationality's faith with a focus on a faith community made up of all nationalities, as Christ has come and in Him there is neither Jew nor Greek. I do understand your idea that Israel's faith continues to have some meaning, but your valid view about this does not really contradict the idea that now we have a new belief to replace it. If there was no replacement at all in any way, it would not matter if you followed Judaism or Christianity- they would be equally good. But Christianity replaces all kinds of things, like replacing Christ's sacrifice on top of animal sacrifices.

      Personally, the idea that God uses the New Testament to replace harsh things in the Old Testament is a comfort to me.

      As for your opening about "I will bless you" in Genesis 12, the promise you emphasis was made to Abraham, and in Galatians 3-4 Paul explains that Christians are Abraham's descendants and that this is how Christians get that promise to Abraham. By the way, the Hexagram in your opening illustration was very rarely used in ancient Judaism.

    • AdamMaarschalk profile image
      Author

      Adam Maarschalk 3 years ago from Bowling Green, Ohio

      Michael, thank you, and I can relate to what you said about some of your friends. I've witnessed the same thing among some of my friends and acquaintances.

    • AdamMaarschalk profile image
      Author

      Adam Maarschalk 3 years ago from Bowling Green, Ohio

      George: Amen. That verse is indeed very clear (as are others like it throughout the New Testament). I'm also grateful for the new covenant, and it's sad that so many don't seem to appreciate all the realities that it contains for God's people.

    • AdamMaarschalk profile image
      Author

      Adam Maarschalk 3 years ago from Bowling Green, Ohio

      Rakovsky, thanks for your feedback. I fully agree with your synopsis of Genesis 12 and Galatians 3-4.

      I'm a little unclear as to how you define "Replacement Theology," what you believe "the alternative" is, and what you mean by "Israel's faith" (in your second paragraph).

      I've heard the same thing as what you said about the hexagram in the picture at the top of this post. I sourced it from a viral Facebook post, but as I said in my post that illustration represents the faulty "replacement theology" (i.e. replacing Jesus and His church) that I left behind.

    • lawrence01 profile image

      Lawrence Hebb 22 months ago from Hamilton, New Zealand

      Some intriguing stuff here. Not sure I'd go with Peter and Paul teaching replacement theology but some Christians certainlt have!

      God does have a plan for the Nation of Israel, but its so that they will "weep as they look on him they pierced" and will turn to him.

      Lawrence

    Click to Rate This Article