- Religion and Philosophy»
- Christianity, the Bible & Jesus
Why It's Written "In the Name 'Of' Jesus"
Educated Guesses Based On History And Bible
A Biblical prophecy (Exo. 4:6-8) suggests the person called Jesus was a man of color turned diseased leprous as snow by teachings as white. The Bible, especially the Old Testament, is a book of Metaphors, Allegories, Parables and Symbol-types I call MAPS that are types of the New Testament and especially end-time events. By Learning to interpret them, after being born again, sheds light on the Bible’s meaning. We must first understand everything done is being done by god as Isaiah 45:7 saying I form light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the lord do [present tense] all these things indicates.
Understanding hunters, as Esau was, are outdoorsman and the sun darkens their skin while tent dwellers as Jacob was would loose color from not getting sun struggling in the womb symbolizes black and white man have always had dissension between them. A glimpse was shown (Gen. 12:11-13) when Abram believed his life would be endangered because his wife, Sarai, was fair as they approached Khemet Israel renamed Egypt. Understanding that we can see how Esau and Jacob made that dissension between those two ethnic magnifiers clear that it has always been.
The Bible doesn’t describe Leah nor Rachel’s skin colors but the probability is the two girls may not have been by the same mother. Laban means light yet Leah’s mother may not have been. Jacob symbolizes Europeans but with most of his children by Leah and servants may suggest all had the stronger African gene making eleven of his children be of color. That allows us to say Joseph and Benjamin were fair skinned and all of Leah children were of color. The probability that all of Jacob’s children except Rachel’s were of color provides a solid reason the 10 brothers to hate Joseph enough to sell him into Egypt, along with his dream’s interpretation.
Since to this day there is dissension between blacks and whites and the man called Jesus was foretold to be a Rod of the stem of Jesse (Isa. 11:1) who was of Judah and not Rachel’s son, Jesus was a man of color. However, after his ascension as the gospel was spread abroad his color became leprous via teaching him was white. About a hundred years after his ascension and teaching him was white Constantine made Christianity Rome’s religion and required keeping him fair skinned. Thus, the biblical person of Jesus remains diseased as snow today.
Knowing fair skinned Romans would not accept a dark skinned man as their Christ they would need to change the name protecting it against his color being made known by the Hebrews called Jews, a people mostly of color who knew their history, otherwise making him fair skinned and his Hebrew name being preached by the Catholic Church would cause questions that changing it would elevate.
How the name was chosen I know not but Janus is the name of a Roman god and Zeus the name of a Greek god so maybe they made the name by merging the two, it may have always been a Spanish name Rome profaned the pronunciation of or the Nicene Council may have given it to Spain as a deception but what we do know is it isn’t found anywhere in the Hebrew language.
The Unsolved Mystery
I’ve often wondered what the definition of Jesus was and where it came from. Spanish speakers say it is the name of the Lord and Savior but no definition. As said in Educated Guesses Based On History And Bible above, how the name was chosen I know not but I’ve had an earnest desire to know. It is written ask and it shall be given, knock and the door shall be opened unto you and seek and ye shall find which is saying, have an unwavering desire for it and it will be obtained. So, on the above date while reading page three of a Washington, DC paper called Express an article entitled “Disabled youth shine in art” revealed the definitions as “Je” and “Suis” means “I Am” and “Because You Are.”
I pointed out above it could have the Spanish origin “Yo Soy” written “Jesus” revealing its origin was formed by uniting two words with adjustments to forms it. The English translation given was as the definition with some profaning by uniting them and removing the letter "i" formed the name Jesus. Yet it is the will of I AM THAT I AM for it to be done because Isaiah wrote in chapter forty-five and verse seven, “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.”
Google Translator showed “Yo Soy” is Spanish and “Je Suis” French with both meaning “I am,” if the translator can be trusted. Continuing the search and talking with a Frenchman revealed “Je Suis” is a French word and means “I Am” as “Yo Soy” does.
In 1977 I searched a dictionary of Hebrew and English names for a name translating of Jesus but found none. I later discovered the name of the man called Jesus in English should have been the English name Joshua but with no relationship to Jesus. Then I ran across the two French words Je meaning I and Suis meaning Am that I considered to be a Nicene Council’s development by removing the i out of suis and united them into Jesus then gave it to the Spanish to use as a name. Now I have found a source saying Iesus is a translation of the Greek name Iesous a transliteration of the Hebrew name Joshua. All time I used Joshua defined I AM THAT I AM Saves because of Matthew 28:19-20.
With the United States of America being the Bible’s Mystery Babylon, meaning babbling and intentional to cause the misunderstanding of words for controlling its people, I must confess I am confused. Since spirit hasn’t shown me which name to use I believe it’s to remain in use until the wise virgins enter Armageddon.
Finding The Names “Of” Jesus
Throughout the New Testament we find written “in the name of Jesus” and “in Jesus’ name” but in no place do we find “in the name Jesus.” In the English language the word of connotes belonging to whereas when left out it saying that it is. So if Jesus is the name, as Christians often say, why isn’t it written in the name Jesus reflecting it is the name instead of using the word of?
When looking at Jesus’ words in the Gospels he says both I the son of man (Mat. 16:13-16) and other times only the son of man (Mat. 12:39-40 & 17:11-12) with the latter said as if he may be referring to someone other than himself. What’s said in Matthew 16 intended to ensure there was no misunderstanding he was talking about himself while the other two appears to be intentionally deceptive, because it was about him and someone else. The following is why.
According to Matthew 27:45-28:1 Jesus died somewhere around the sixth hour Friday (3 pm CE time) and was out of the earth by dawn Sunday: Matthew 12:40 reads for as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. That makes the day and time of entering the ground at pre-sunset Friday to the time of his resurrection at dawn Sunday to be an error since from Friday night until pre-dawn Sunday is two nights and one day. In Matthew 17:11-12 it appears he didn’t want people to know Elijah is to be the second messiah, especially since Revelation 19:12C reads, he had a name written that no man knew but he himself suggesting it was intended to misdirect as Isa. 45:7 shows. Those examples show in the name of Jesus is written as a pseudonym for the Rod and Branch messiahs of Isa. 11:1.
Let us now look at an Old Testament type to see if we can discover the crucified messiah’s name.
Israel’s entering Canaan is a prophetic type everyone entering the spiritual promise, Moses brought them out of bondage and across the red sea and to Canaan’s border but did not enter (Deut. 32:52). That will be the same with the prophet like him (Deut. 18:15 & 18), Elijah. Elijah is also the landowner (Mat. 20:1-16) in the paymaster parable who seeks workers during the last days who, as the prophet like Moses, protects them from the Red Sea of blood during the world ending battle (Rev. 16:14) by gathering the five wise virgins (Mat. 25:1-12) in Armageddon (Rev. 16:15-16) and leading them into the wilderness (the millenniums) afterwards. They give birth to the foolish virgins (Rev. 6:9-11) from the last material world’s end and are replaced by the five dying from this one (Rev. 14:13) before giving birth the rest of the discarnated (Rev. 20:4-5). Those who discarnate during Israel’s 40-year wilderness stay and Moses symbolize those who are to be raptured (Num. 14:1-33) while those born to replenish the earth for the coming civilization were represented by those who went in Canaan.
God appointed Old Testament Yoshua to take Israel into Canaan and Yoshua called Jesus to take spiritual Israel into their promise but according to John 14:3-4 he scouts it revealing man don’t enter it discarnated, they must have a body functioning like his post resurrection body to enter it. He’s also the paymaster paying spiritual Israel the rapture beginning with the last spiritually born and works his way to Elijah who becomes Alpha and Omega (Rev. 1:17) after sixth millenniums of this earth’s rejuvenation to look like a new heaven and new earth where man don’t have the fleshly feeling (Rev. 21:1-4).
Another reason his name would have been Yoshua is because Matthew 28:19 reads in part go ye, baptizing them in the name of the father, and of the son, and of the Holy Ghost saying the son’s and Holy Ghost’s names includes the father’s. The definition of father’s name as provided in Exodus 3:14 means I AM THAT I AM: the Yo in Yoshua is an abbreviation of Yohuweh reflecting the father’s name as the jah in Elijah who shall become the Holy Ghost (whole man doing what ghosts do after his resurrection) means I AM THAT I AM in the father’s name. Therefore two messiahs are necessary to fulfill the prophecies. The go ye in Matthew 28:19 suggests Jesus had been a wanderer prior to becoming the historical messiah to Israel and Elijah will prior to becoming the messiah to Judah of prophecy (Gen. 49:1 & 8-12). So when Jesus said follow me as Exodus 4:8 and Matthew 17:5’s hear ye him suggests, both messiahs’ examples are to be followed for entering the promise. Only a few Jews followed Joshua and no more than the 5 of the 10 virgins will Elijah.
Do you see that as what the scriptures say about Christ?
I believe the Nicene Council of the CE year 325 in Nicaea united the French word Je with Suis and had Spain to include the name pronounced hey Zeus in their language without its meaning. They arranged for the name to be mentioned a few times in history to appear historic and changed some Hebrew days representing him to match The Pagan Book of Days celebrations in Is Christ The Reason For The Season.
When we know words’ definitions and the fact that the Bible is a book of MAPS its revelation is obtainable without the definitions since man preach the words without the vision of their meanings by the spiritually born. Therefore, as presented, the purpose for the Bible’s reading In the name 'of' Jesus is because it’s a pseudonym for the two different messiahs Exodus 4:6-8 reveals as a first and latter signs and many others prophecies reveal there were to be. Thus, we are looking for Elijah the messiah to learn how he lived, follow his example (Isa. 7:14-22) to enter the promise called heaven and everlasting life but until Elijah enters his temple (Mal. 3:1B) few if any (Rev. 19:12) will know who he is.