ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

1984 Olympics: Katarina Witt, Rosalynn Sumners, Kira Ivanova, Tiffany Chin and Elaine Zayak

Updated on September 8, 2015

Katarina Witt in 1984

Katarina Witt in 1984

Fleming complimented "Very well done" after her free program.

Well, that's comparatively appreciable, but it ain't impressive at all. Witt's usual power and audacity appears not so efficient to produce a performance. Her skating simply appears flat and disjointed.

It's quite messy. In conclusion, To say Witt's victory in the 1984 Olympics is not convincing is a gross understatement. Witt's popularity might influence the result, but even then, it's categorically an example of wrong judging.

Witt might edge Sumners out in short program due to her, but she didn't actually win free program.

Her PCS in free program is 7.5 while 7.75 for short program.

Rosalynn Sumners in 1984

Rosalynn Sumners in 1984

Although Sumners aborted a few jumps, she definitely beat Witt in free program. Sumner might not be the winner of free program, but she didn't lose to Witt here.

It is more reasonable for Sumners to win.

Her speed, power, and contextual continuity stood out, and Witt didn't overcome Sumners' skating; Sumners in fact edged out Witt.

In short program, Sumners will get -GOE for the failed jump. Her PCS is 7.75 for both free and short.

Kira Ivanova in 1984

Ivanova is a skater with poor jump technique.

There is no way for her to get on the podium. I guess Ivanova is a case benefited from Cold War era. Her jump deficiency appears too glaring.

It is interesting to know that Dick and Peggy both criticized Russian skating depletion even then. No wonder why Russian skaters repeat that bad tradition today.

So this is a smoking gun for how international politics heavily weighed in on that competition. Dick pointed out how wrong the marks are. Yes, it's bullshit.

Please don't trumpet the result of the 1984 Olympics. That's scandalous.

Her PCS is 7.0.

Tiffany Chin in 1984

Tiffany Chin in 1984

Tiffany Chin was perhaps the most talented skater in this competition, besides Elaine Zayak.

Her short height and arms and legs stood in her way of aesthetic lines. However, she demonstrated how high her skating proficiency was in free skating.

That's why Fleming here nominated Chin for the 1988 Olympic headliner.

Her PCS is 8.0.

Elaine Zayak in 1984

Elaine Zayak in 1984

You see how different she was on ice compared to other skaters.

The way she moves and the way she uses her body as momentum picks up. That's how a skater moves on ice. Zayak was the best among the lot. No question about it.

Although Fleming had complained Zayak's artistic ability in the past, here Fleming gave a compliment to Zayak. She couldn't help it. Well, it's so obvious that Zayak was the only one who incorporated her moves into music of free program.

The scores only reflect on the prejudice Zayak received at the time. But as for Fleming, her reluctance to give a full nod to Zayak was based on legitimate questions, at least to her, that Zayak's skating didn't advocate line aesthetics.

But who did well on that part at the time?

Her PCS is 8.5.

Who do you think is the real winner of the 1984 Olympics?

See results


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)