ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Technology»
  • Consumer Electronics & Personal Gadgets»
  • Portable Electronics

The Best Compact Superzoom Camera 2013: Panasonic DMC-FZ200

Updated on May 21, 2013

Panasonic Beats Out Bigger Names Like Canon

When it comes to cameras, Canon is the world's leading manufacturer, controlling nearly 20 percent of all market share. But when it comes to compact superzoom cameras, Panasonic has them beat.

The new Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 is arguably the best superzoom on the market in 2013. CNET called it "the megazoom that has it all" and another camera review site said it's "darn close to perfect." I have to agree with them. I'm a diehard Canon fan and have preferred Canon for more than 30 years, but when I went shopping for a superzoom, I chose the Panasonic. Here's why.

Sample Photo from the Panasonic Superzoom Camera

The 24x optical zoom (600mm equivalent) on the Panasonic DMC-FZ200 gets you close to your subject and is fast enough to capture action.
The 24x optical zoom (600mm equivalent) on the Panasonic DMC-FZ200 gets you close to your subject and is fast enough to capture action. | Source

How Close Can You Get with a 24x Zoom Lens?

The Panasonic DMC-FZ200 has a 24x optical zoom that can go from the equivalent of 25mm (shown here)...
The Panasonic DMC-FZ200 has a 24x optical zoom that can go from the equivalent of 25mm (shown here)... | Source
... to the equivalent of 600mm (shown here). Both photos were taken from the same spot.
... to the equivalent of 600mm (shown here). Both photos were taken from the same spot. | Source

Why The Longest Zoom Isn't Necessarily the Best Zoom

Most people buy a superzoom camera for one reason - they want to get closer to the action.

Many of the most popular compact models on the market have an optical zoom range of 5x or less, but today's superzooms can get you up to 10 times closer to the action. But getting closer isn't the only feature to consider.

The question you should ask before purchasing a compact superzoom is, "What am I going to use this camera for?" If you only plan to take photos in bright sunlight of stationary objects or people standing still to pose for the camera, and you simply want something to help you get closer, you could probably choose just about any camera on the market and get good results.

But if you want a camera to take close-up photos from the sidelines while your kids play soccer or while you enjoy a professional sports game, or if you're planning to capture photos of birds in your backyard or wild animals on a safari, there's something more important to consider - speed. You're going to need a fast shutter speed to capture these moving images without blur. And that's where most superzooms fail.

With a typical zoom lens, the closer you zoom in, the less light passes through to the sensor. That means the camera must use a slower shutter speed to make sure the photos aren't too dark. If you're already shooting in low light (such as early morning or late afternoon) or your subject is moving fast, this could mean your photo won't be exposed properly. It will likely be blurry or too dark.

Professional photographers avoid this problem by using lenses that allow them to shoot with the same shutter speed and f-stop across the entire zoom range. But these professional lenses come with a hefty price tag. For instance, a new Canon 70 -200mm f/2.8 lens currently sells for over $2000. If you want a 400mm Nikon f/2.8 lens, it'll cost you about $10,000.

A compact superzoom camera is obviously a much more affordable option. But most of them don't offer the ability to maintain the widest aperture at the longest zoom. What makes the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 the best compact superzoom camera in 2013 is that it's currently the only superzoom that allows you to shoot at the same f/2.8 aperture across the entire zoom range, just like the professional lenses do.

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 vs. Other Superzoom Compact Cameras

The DMC-FZ200 is unique among the current crop of compact consumer-level superzoom cameras. For about $500, the Panasonic offers an amazing 24x Leica DC VARIO-ELMARIT optical zoom lens (25-600mm equivalent) with f/2.8 aperture across the entire zoom range.

The 12.1 MP camera also offers 1080p HD video, 5.5 fps continuous shooting mode, a 100% field-of-vision tilt LCD, and plenty of special features, including creative effects such as Toy Effect and Star Filter, Panorama Shot, and 3D images.

There are, of course, other superzoom compact cameras on the market with a longer zoom range. The Canon Powershot SX50 currently holds the title, with an impressive 50x optical zoom (24 - 1200mm equivalent), but it has a slower f/3.4 - f/6.5 aperture range. The Nikon Coolpix P510 comes in close behind with a 42x optical zoom (24-1000mm equivalent) and f/3.0 - f/5.9 aperture range.

For sheer distance, these cameras easily outrank the Panasonic, but if you're looking for the most versatile, fastest superzoom compact camera on the market, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 can't be beat.


Which is more important to you?

Which is more important: absolute optical zoom range or being able to capture action without blurring?

See results

Please Share Your Thoughts on the Best Compact Superzoom Camera for 2013

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • lisa42 profile image

      lisa42 5 years ago from Sacramento

      Ghost32, before I saw the Panasonic, I was debating between the Canon SX50 and the Nikon P510. But I prefer speed to focal length, so I ultimately went with Panasonic. There's no doubt, however, that Canon makes awesome cameras, so I'm sure the SX50 would be a fun camera to own.

    • profile image

      Ghost32 5 years ago

      Interesting. In my case, I'd LIKE speed but will usually opt for magnification first. My current Canon SX230HS has 14X optical plus 4X digital, total of 56X out at the long end. Enough for a full moon to take up a good portion of the frame.

      Additionally, I'm "hooked" on the compact point-and-shoot Canon, which rides in a nylon case at my left hip during most hours I'm out of the house, night or day. (Night shots have included things like Mojave green rattlesnakes and camel spiders.)

      However, I will freely admit the 56X setting does not produce a wildlife photo that could be considered top quality. It's certainly better than nothing, but....

      More than the Panasonic, you've gotten me interested in checking out the Canon SX50. :)

      Voted Up and Helpful as Heck.