ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Wikipedia Odyssey: 2001 and Beyond

Updated on January 5, 2016
© Paul Stansifer and Wikipedia
© Paul Stansifer and Wikipedia

"Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing." --Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia co-founder

"People rely on Wikipedia, and a lot of it is wrong. But because there it is on the Internet, they assume it's right. Rumor gets printed as fact. We may have lost our critical facility as a nation." --Ben Mezrich, writer

The dream of vast, free knowledge versus how reliable and trustworthy it can be. Those two conflicting points of view seem to stand on each corner of the Wikipedia boxing ring. Regardless of where you stand on that ring, you have to acknowledge the impact that the "free encyclopedia" has had in research, education, web surfing, or just simple curiosity. But let's see where it all started.

Wikipedia was born

Wikipedia was officially launched in January 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Before that, wikis (which means "quick" in Hawaii) were already used in corporate environments, but they never became widespread. Wales and Sanger's idea was to create an alternative to the traditional encyclopedia, which was usually prepared by scholars and experts of certain subjects. Wikipedia, on the other hand, is constantly edited by its own users, allowing for a more open and varied content.

With time, the Wikipedia phenomenon blew up into one of the most popular websites ever (it is constantly ranked in the Top 10 of popular websites, according to Alexa). It is available in almost 300 languages, all of which feature a total of close to 40 million articles (5 in the English Wikipedia), and has a vast amount of editors and users.

Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger © 2010, Lane Hartwell and 2007, Associated Press
Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger © 2010, Lane Hartwell and 2007, Associated Press

But Wikipedia's huge popularity and broad scope is perhaps counter-balanced by the criticism it receives for its user-edited nature, which many people – like Mezrich in the opening quote – consider unreliable. Here in Puerto Rico, teachers aren't supposed to consider Wikipedia references in their students' assignments and projects, whereas Hubber bethperry asked a question here a couple of days ago about our feelings on educators recommending Wikipedia as a resource for their students' home work.

And although lots of people see Wikipedia's editable nature as reason enough to dismiss it, I think it's reason enough to embrace it. In a time and generation where books, libraries, and encyclopedias have become nearly obsolete, Wikipedia opens up a whole world of diverse, dynamic knowledge to anyone. And that sums up two of its biggest advantages for me.

Get Fuzzy comic strip © Darby Conley and UFS
Get Fuzzy comic strip © Darby Conley and UFS

Wikipedia is diverse

Wikipedia is not limited in its scope and breadth. You are bound to find almost anything, ANYTHING, within its pages. Articles range from Barack Obama or Christopher Columbus to a list of cricketers banned for match fixing or a list of characters from The Sopranos. The fact that is user-edited gives anyone the chance to contribute and create any article you deem valuable or worthy enough. That ability to cover a lot of diverse topics and grow sets the free encyclopedia apart from other resources which can seem limited in scope to some, and whose growth is dependent on external forces.

Wikipedia is dynamic

But Wikipedia's ability to grow also says also a lot about its dynamic nature. Its content is far from static; always changing, always updated. Whereas former resources, like an Encarta CD-ROM, weren't able to reflect changes in its content, Wikipedia updates faster than any news program. From articles about TV episodes just broadcast, sports games just finished, notable people that just died, or world events that just occurred, Wikipedia allows users to constantly update articles to reflect changes around the world. Geography buffs can find information about the establishment of South Sudan as an independent country, while sports fans can instantly see who won the 2013 NBA Finals or who was picked first in the latest draft. The access to constantly updated information is invaluable, regardless of where it comes.

Wikipedia as a Social Experiment

But despite those two strengths, I think Wikipedia's biggest achievement comes from the logistics behind its existence and its social background. Despite being founded by Wales and Sanger, and having a workforce of little more than 100 people, Wikipedia's existence depends solely on the editor itself. The one that's sitting in his home, writing about the properties of Zinc, or the one that signed up from a cyber cafe to write the plot of a Game of Thrones episode.

The fact that thousands of editors can get together to collaborate, manage, and protect such a vast project, says a lot about us as human beings. The establishment of the "backstage" politics of Wikipedia, created and enforced by the users themselves, is an impressive accomplishment in the Web 2.0 generation. Is there ground to improve? Of course, there is. But for a project that has little over 10 years and such a vast reach, I think it's a unique achievement.

From everyday tasks like determining the notability of an article or moderating an "edit war", to maintaining and monitoring long-term tasks like projects to improve or enhance certain groups of articles, to launching huge global projects and gatherings, most of it falls on the hands of the editors and users of the site, which voluntarily push these initiatives forward. These principles of global collaboration and social integration between different users all around the world that have nothing to gain out of it, should be something to embrace.

To see this happen, in a time where some businesses can't even agree on the release date of a product, or the coversheet for their weekly TPS reports, should be remarkable, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the end result. Moreover, I think it's diverse input of knowledge gives it more credibility than some newspapers and channels that are subject to corporate agendas and political changes.

I don't work for the Wikimedia Foundation, nor am I a moderator or administrator on it. But as a frequent reader and editor, I respect the goals that it wants to achieve and admire the efforts of the website and its editors to reach those goals. Because of this, I feel that a swift dismissal of EVERYTHING on Wikipedia shouldn't be the reaction to it. I do agree that there are still things to work on it, and that's part of the beauty of it, because it's an ever-changing project; and I do think that people should always look for additional sources for their information. But that's not different from what most researchers do with any single source. To automatically discard all of the information in it is tantamount to challenging the knowledge of thousands of people around the world with a single blow.

I think Wikipedia deserves a chance to be considered first as a worthy example of mutual collaboration, and then as a good source of varied information. With the success and popularity that the website has had among regular Internet users, and the grasp it has on typical Internet searches, we have to accept the website is here to stay. And it's improvement, just like its creation and growth, it's up to "us".

NOTE: Thief12 has been a frequent editor on Wikipedia since 2005, and has more than 20,000 edits on the website.

In Wikipedia We Trust?

How much do you trust the information in Wikipedia?

See results

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)