DOJ already knew Israeli Cellebrite had an NAND Apple hack BEFORE the FBI all writs act & if so then
Does this mean that the FBI was trying to leverage a terrorist tragedy to set a legal precedent? Was the FBI's public grandstanding calculated to get 'case law' precedent that US law makers have refused to give the FBI by legislation? Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said, "This unprecedented reading of a nearly 230-year-old law would create a dangerous precedent that would put at risk the foundations of strong security for our people and privacy in the digital age,”
Cool breakdown. Hey you cannot blame them for trying. Privacy hinders policing actions and investigations. Just like rights do. It is the job of the DOJ to help erode those protections.
Kind of strange isn't it?
They are sworn to protect us but in order to do so they want to take away our rights.
We can complain all we want to about our courts but we should be thankful we have the best judicial system in the world.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.