Reading & video games are both advantageous to a child learning experience.
77
How can we manufacture reading & writing games that offers immediate reward like the video games do.
Children are stimulated to play video games mainly because of the rewards they received for every task achieved through playing the game. As described by some, it is the desire to see what happens next in the preceding stage that gives the kick which makes the child wants to play the game. Although some games promote aggression and violent responses to conflict, not all games simulate those types of behaviors. SimCity promote knowledge that can be useful to a child as that child grows up to understand the world he or she lives in.
Reading on the other hand, is a mind exercising function. Most children do not develop a kick for reading until they are a little older. I must also add that parents can help the child develop this function by playing an active role through participating in the reading exercise with the child. However, the reward obtains from reading books are far less acknowledged from a child perspective than an adult. The advantages that a child gets from reading books are directly related to future benefits that are available in today's society. The information obtained from reading good books is important to a child education, long – term career benefits and future goals.
Games are relevant to real life situations in the sense that they reward a child when they've done well and punish them when they have failed to achieved a task. As we often noted in real life situations, when someone does good he is rewarded, and punished when done wrong. The same logic is often applied to game playing, except in some games the past is so close to the future that it often reminds the child of his previous mistakes. Perhaps, the reason why a child learn faster when playing video game relates to his or her interpretation of past experiences.
As it is known by some, before anyone can learn anything, perception must take place. The child must become aware of what is being taught through one of the senses. Meaning, the child has to hear, feel or see what is being taught before he or she can interpret the lesson through those senses. In the case of video games, in some situation, all three of those senses are applied in the learning experience. And it's because of that we say video games can help a child learn faster than books.
Reading on the other hand, only occupied one of the senses which we all know as seeing. One can read a material and yet has no understanding of what they have read. Reading requires children to apply their cognitive skills which are attention, memory & symbolic thinking. As some parents have noticed, some have argued that cognitive skills are a necessity when it comes to play video games. Attention, memory & symbolic thinking are all required for a child to be a successful game player. As stated by Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) “we see things not as they are but as we are.” Since a child focus mostly on playing games for the purpose of rewards, anything that does not involved immediate rewards has no interest to that child. Now the question that comes to mind is how can we manufacture reading & writing games that offers immediate reward as the child plays the game?
The advantages that a child gets from reading books can be categorized in two groups. The information gathered from the books and the mental work that goes into processing and storing the information gathered. The mental benefits of reading incorporate the power of imagination, attention and concentration. Reading encourages people to become active participant in their society, participate in entertainment, events that leads to progress. Unfortunately, the national endowment released a study in 2004 that showed reading for pleasure had declined among all groups of Americans. That was since 2004, we are now in 2009. It must be reminded that Tex messaging is not reading nor is it writing, let us not confuse that for reading & writing. Tex messaging contained too much short hand writing which carries no merit for literary content.
Studies have proved that violent games can promote aggression in some children. Likewise, studies have showed that violent movies are also capable of stimulating aggression. However, they have been no studies that can prove that reading books influences violent behavior in children, even when considering horror novels. The supporting argument state that children often lose their attention or gets distracted when reading books because the reading material does not captivate them as the video game does, whereas the graphic details of the video games plus the violent actions portrayed by actors will always captured the child attention.
The graphical violence signals stimuli to the child subconscious mind that is not in common with previous graphical record obtain by the child mind. As the child adapt to those graphical violence the child becomes less sensible to violence behavior and therefore adapt to those graphical violence as the norm. Meaning, when the child sees again that graphical violence, his mind produces a habitual respond to them. This is not to say that this will cause the child to adapt to real violence, because real violence has a different notation in the sense that it can be sudden and painful.
Although some video games promote violent behavior, it does have its benefits. It is true that playing video games does in fact improve one’s visual intelligence and hand coordination, but having the ability to read goes far beyond these advantages. I see video games as a means for someone to improve his or her cognitive skills. A cognitive skill is a skill that must be taught. A skill needed for laying the foundation for immediate and future awards. Like learning the alphabet, numbers or a trade in college, certain video games can be categorized as such. For example, a pilot simulation game can help prepare someone who wants to pursue a career in aviation.
Likewise reading is also a cognitive skill, except it demands more concentration than video games. Whereas, playing video games can be done by just paying attention, reading requires concentration for proper understanding. Where video games help to prepare one in acquiring visual and mechanical skills, reading focuses more on literary and analytical skills. Therefore, you cannot become a medical doctor by simply playing a medical gross Anatomy game. Logical thinking and long attention span which are not often required in video games would be an important skill to become a medical doctor.
One of the differences between playing a video game vs. reading is that the player of the video games often focuses his short attention span on the opponents, whereas reading takes every subject in account. It would also be useful if some video game manufactures would built applicable functions in the video game that would take all subjects in consideration just as reading would require a reader to do. In video games they are no subliminal messages, every message is forward, the gamer either respond to it or don't. That is not the case for reading, in reading, depending on the writer, there are sometime subliminal messages hidden within the writing as mean to cause the reader to think. Let's be honest kids there's not that much thinking going on with video games.
But more importantly, the problem I have with video games is that most games are programmed to function on an interactive platform design to project false reality. When one stops playing, when facing the real world, one can find themselves unable to manage conflict logically. The ability to think before one act goes onto the back burner. The person becomes irrational to the point where his ego is engulfed by all those illogical thoughts assembled during the period of game playing. And as a result, this is where art begins to imitate life.
However, although I truly think reading is important for future benefits, I must include that reading sometime cause one to be not original when writing literary content. Those people sometime borrow too much from their favorite authors. Their writings have become a reflection of those authors and thereby carry alone with them their author’s ideas without any challenge.
However, reading is good exercise for the mind, it prepares one for future opportunities & helps one to appreciate and respect other writer’s literary content. I sometime wish that I did much reading, had I done that, my spelling could have improved and so would my writing. It seems like now days most people do they readings on line. They seems to be too occupied to pick up a book, but good writings and those who are famous will always attract readers. We are a country of gossipers, if one write today about whose celebrity boyfriend was caught with whose celebrity's girlfriend, it will make the bestselling book tomorrow.
Anyhow, there are many books that I can suggest, but one of the few that can help heal this nation racial barrier is this outstanding human beings, an American Jewish patriot Dr.Tim Wise who has continued to contribute to the struggle to end systematic racism. As we celebrate Dr. Kings Jr, both white & black who are for change, and if they really want change, I truly recommend that they check Tim Wise work. He can really help us reach across the ale by giving us a helping hand of knowledge on systematic racism. All that would be required of us would be to keep an open mind.
As black people, we should not presume that we know everything that is to be known about systematic racism just because we're black, for they are so much to learn it often cause me to repeat my grandmother’s words "those who knows, know."
- The Color Line » Tim Wise
Race, Ethnicity & Immigration in the 21st Century - http://www.timwise.org/
Coolbreezing said the simplest form of racism is pure ignorance ...see what Tim Wise has to say on this subject.
Tim Wise Views On Affirmative Action
Obama's views on Affirmative Action
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
Hey! What’s up Andrew .....I see where the confusion came from. What i said was (As the child adapt to those graphical violence the child becomes less sensible to violence behavior and therefore adapt to it as the norm.) It is my mistake for not making my self clear. What I meant to say is that the child became adapt to that graphical violence as the norm not voilent itself. Meaning when the child sees again those graphical violence he produces an habitual respond to them. Real violence does carry a different notation than the video game that can be more sudden. I don't think that human beings can ever get used to violence, thinks for the correction.
Ah, right, I see what you mean. Sorry for the confusion. I take it your point is that someone playing a violent video game adapts to the violence in the context of the game, as opposed to becoming to believe that violence generally is the norm in reality.
Back to the main point of the hub, I had a friend who bought a game that was based entirely around the crusades. He said "I'm going to learn way more here then I did in any history class." He was probably right. I think people have more of a desire to learn when the learning experience is interactive and they have some control. With a school class the teacher can appear like a dictator that you always have to follow the lead of. Reading is not as interactive but you do have complete control and can stop if you don't like it.
great articles and your think













Andrew Hawkley says:
10 months ago
It's good to see you defending video games as a form of learning. However I still don't buy the concept that entertainment with simulated violence makes people believe that violence is normal in reality. I think the fact the violence is in an abstract context actually re-affirms the belief that violence belongs to the abstract. I do remember a case once when someone after watching 2 fast 2 furious (not a type of movie I'd personally bother watching) got straight into his car and died in a high speed crash. But some people are just uncontrolled and compulsive, if a piece of simulated violence/action doesn't push them over the edge then something else will. It's not as if Jack the Ripper saw any horror films.