So long as elections are first past the post the system will effectively create two parties competing for the centrist vote. There are other parties now, calling the largest of them officially the third party just formalizes them as the protest vote.
Close! Damn close! Regardless of the party accepting the presidential popular vote, we continue to watch the aristocrats in power passing the power to the next centrist leader! The Republicans and Democrats enjoy appetizers together before their unconstitutional dinners! We need a system that REQUIRES 3 parties or more EVERY election to ensure a choice for the American people!
A way to enforce this can be by having legislation that reads "no elected party nominee can become president unless there are ate least 3 parties, and the sitting president shall remain in power until there is justified and viable competition in elections..." -this would cause a serious uproar and upheaval in American politics, guaranteeing that another party (whether biased or otherwise) would join and make things more interesting and realistic.
There are already hundreds of parties so that requirement is already satisfied.
But under FFP only two will get a lot of votes.
I am not sure how making government cease to operate would suddenly create a substantive third party?
The number of parties in a country doesn't matter. In fact, there are numerous - 20+ - parties in the US each election. It's just that none of them get any financial support.
If you like a Libertarian, Constitutional, Green, Socialist, or whatever party, donate money and get involved.
The reason that 3rd party never gets enough votes is that EVERYONE is convinced that they are throwing away the vote, so they are afraid to vote for the guy they like. Instead, they vote for whoever they think is popular, or whoever they feel bullied into voting for. If more people would vote their conscience, and pick the one that is actually the right person for the job, it could make a difference.
Under FFP the odds are a third party vote is wasted. The exception (like the current UK coalition government) are extremely rare.)
The thing is if you break the deadlock by going proportional, the third party gets all the power as they decide which of the big two gets the majority.
It's kind of a mess either way.
I agree, which is why I believe there should be an American reformation concluding that 3 (or more) parties MUST run in order for elections to take place. By doing so, in the event of only 2 strong parties and a weak third, the public could and would demand that a new party be formed, and hopefully a more democratic one. Most likely, as a result, an opposing or different party alongside it would arrive thus making four parties in total. The argument for this is that there are like 10 parties in general elections (if not more), but with bad appropriative funding and exposure. It usually results in the stupid continuation of our half-retarded American political agenda from the previous presidency...
sorry, lots to say, and my bad
by Thomas Byers4 years ago
As a American Veteran I used to support the Democrat Party but over time I changed to the Republican Party. But I have always been the type of person to really investigate and as I began to check into what both parties...
by Deforest3 weeks ago
I am not saying that none of the candidates gathered the 207 electorate votes. I am just stating that a majority of the US citizens vote blank. Will the majority rule?
by FatLibertarian6 years ago
political parties and the conflict between ALL of them, but mainly the republicans and democrats, is just a distraction from people fixing whats really wrong with america. most things are. maybe one day people will wake...
by Friendlyword4 years ago
I'm not sure is this will work again:One day after I wrote a hub about the illegal attempts by Governor Rick Scott and his Secretary Of State to purge Blacks, Latinos and Elderly voters from Florida voter rolls; a...
by woolman606 years ago
When some criticizes your political party, how do you respond, and do you find yourself using sarcasm to retaliate?
by lady_love1585 years ago
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/201 … party.htmlAs well they should! In spite of that dumb a** Reid saying they are going away, they aren't! They will be a force to be recend with as anyone can see in these...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.