ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Class Action Lawsuits

Updated on December 26, 2016

The story of one class action lawsuit.

IBM Pension Class Action lawsuit - Cooper v. IBM settled 5/2007. A summary report and personal commentary.

Note: It is my intention to provide information for the average person. If there are any errors on this lens, please notify me. I will gladly correct it. Also, I welcome comments and suggestions for additions to this lens.

- May, 2007

My personal view

As a former IBMer of 28 years, let me summarize the crux of this case.

1. IBM traditionally had a "defined benefit" pension plan for all regular employees.

2. In 1995, IBM decided to modify their plan to

a hybrid plan called a pension equity plan. Then in 1999, IBM introduce a "cash balanced" pension plan.

This plan would allow employees to take their accumulated benefits with them when they move from job to job. It would also create a "cap" to the amount the company is required to pay.

3. There would have been no controversy if the conversion formula was done in a "proper" way and not discriminate against older employees.

4. IBM and its accountants, decided to use this change of benefits to draw off some of the pension funds and help their troubling bottom line.

5. In the process, they have cheated hundreds of thousands of employees of their earned pension benefits.

6. A class action lawsuit was launched by Cooper to address this problem in 2002.

7. 5 years later, after numerous litigation, and appeals, the Supreme Court of the US decided not to hear this case.

8. A summmary penalty of $320,000,000 was imposed on IBM Corp.

9. The funds will be distributed to all party concerned based on some "formula". With a large portion (29%) of first 250 Million and 25% of above that amount going to the attorneys.

10. Approx. 140,000 employees were affected by this case.

Recent developments

Even though I did not initiated or participated in this lawsuit, I received a settlement on April 27, 2007 as part of this class-action.

I am grateful to Cooper for bringing this case to the forefront.

By my estimates, assuming $320 Million payout, the average amount per employee would be $1622 or $15 per month.

This is much less than what they were owed by IBM assuming the previous pension plan were kept in place.

I think IBM did a great dis-service to its employees and to the company reputation when it proceeded with this pension reform. They would have been much better if they just discontinued the previous pension and converted them fairly to the 401K plan (TDSP). That is my humble opinion.

Detail calculation for subClass 1

I requested a detail explanation of the Base Annuity calculation from the Cooper Settlement Admininstration. I received a one page summary.

Here is the detail of how they compute the final number. They don't explain how the various factors are generated. (perhaps someone can explain them to us...)

Here it is:

Base Annuity = Average Annual Compensation(Your salary average) x Base Annuity multiplier (0.00017034) x Years of Service (20 is maximum cap) x Base Annuity Group factor (1.0 for subClass 1, 0.5 for subClass 2) x Age factor (1.0) x Adjustment Factor (1.001251) /12

In addition, depending on your age, there is a final Age reduction factor in my case (0.5195): I was retired at age 50.

That is how your Annuity is computed.

Important link

This is the IBM Pension site. You can login and find out your personal earnings history and your current pension payments and options.

You will need a SS # and a pin. You can create a pin by calling the main pension number 800-796-9876.

Winners and Losers

At the conclusion of these drawn out legal battles, there are always winners and losers.

  • Winners - IBM Senior Executives - Their compensation is tied to the company's performance. Funds taken from IBM pension help improve the company's bottom line. They took a gamble and decided to proceed with the suit instead of settling. They won because the appeals help them reduce the amount of payout.

    Winners - Attorneys - They received a large portion of the final payout by IBM. There share was 29%.

    Losers - IBM employees/retirees - Their pension was reduced significantly and the class action case only recovered a small portion that was lost.

    Losers - IBM Shareholders - The "good will" of IBM was damaged as a result of this lawsuit.

    Losers - IBM Human Resource - Their work will be much harder going forward given their handling of this case.

    IBM has dropped off the Fortune top 100 Best Companies list in 2007.

  • In times like this, I would wonder what TJ Watson Sr. would do? He was the founder of IBM.

    1. First of all, I don't think he would approve of the pension changes the way it was implemented.

    2. At this juncture, I think he would have issued a public apology to all IBM employees/retirees stating that they (the senior management) miss interpretated the law and thought at the time that the changes to the pension program was legal and proper. However, having gone through the courts and received a ruling against IBM, they now apologizes for the error in judgement.

    3. They will make amends by repaying all benefits due to the retirees down to the last penny. This is not rocket science. IBM and it's accountants has the skills to compute exactly how much each retiree affected by these changes and will repay them in a lump sum payment. If necessary, out of the stock options given to top executives which amounted to millions.

    4. Going forward, they will convert all pension benefits to the employee's TDSP account (401K) by using a fair and equitable formula that will not discriminate due to age.

A poll on what to do with the extra money.

What will I do with this windfall?

See results

Reader Feedback

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • jackclee lm profile imageAUTHOR

      Jack Lee 

      2 years ago from Yorktown NY

      credence, thanks. I did not support the government bailout of the Bush Administration back in 2007. Don't confuse Republicans for Conservative. Bush was not a conservative by my definition.

    • Credence2 profile image

      Credence2 

      2 years ago from Florida (Space Coast)

      Good article, Jackclee

      A few years ago, during the GW Bush administration, legislation passed congress making it more difficult for private parties to declare bankruptcy while giving corporate entities more options. One of these options was to make it easier for corporations to renege on its obligations to its employee pensions.

      Too often, the conservative ideology involves giving corporations a free ride and not holding them accountable for passing on their 'shortfalls' to the tax payer.

    • profile image

      anonymous 

      9 years ago

      Our Attornies in Maine are very close to getting money to all of the ex IBM employees over 40 years of age that were unfairly laid off a few years back. The minimum of monies will be at least in the 5 figures amount. Stay tuned for more updates

    • profile image

      anonymous 

      9 years ago

      IBM AGE DISCRIMINATION

      www.ibmdiscriminates.com

      www.ibmdiscriminates.net

      IBM - BIG TIME ON AGE DISCRIMINATION!

    • profile image

      anonymous 

      10 years ago

      Some Of The Best IBM age discrimination information on any site.

      "CLICK"

      www.IBMDiscriminates.com

      &

      www.IBMDiscriminates.net

      &

      Author's Site

      www.JohnLanaMellon.com

      Enjoy

    • profile image

      anonymous 

      10 years ago

      My father was employed during the "ups" and "downs" of the company. It was a shame to see big blue use and abuse my father, who passed almost 10 years ago. the stories of job security were all smoke and mirrors.

    • profile image

      anonymous 

      10 years ago

      Click here for story:

      http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/today/business/...

      Copied, Re-Edited

    • profile image

      anonymous 

      11 years ago

      Your summary and views are fair and right on target. TJ would indeed be embarrassed. IBMers were family and company loyalty was a huge company asset. When the Microsofts and Ciscos were starting up, we were lied to: job security, superior health insurance, and lifetime pension. Damn, we blew it!

    • profile image

      anonymous 

      11 years ago

      Wonderful summary, great commentary, and fantastic perspective... thanks

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)