ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Class Action Lawsuits

Updated on December 26, 2016

The story of one class action lawsuit.

IBM Pension Class Action lawsuit - Cooper v. IBM settled 5/2007. A summary report and personal commentary.

Note: It is my intention to provide information for the average person. If there are any errors on this lens, please notify me. I will gladly correct it. Also, I welcome comments and suggestions for additions to this lens.

- May, 2007

My personal view

As a former IBMer of 28 years, let me summarize the crux of this case.

1. IBM traditionally had a "defined benefit" pension plan for all regular employees.

2. In 1995, IBM decided to modify their plan to

a hybrid plan called a pension equity plan. Then in 1999, IBM introduce a "cash balanced" pension plan.

This plan would allow employees to take their accumulated benefits with them when they move from job to job. It would also create a "cap" to the amount the company is required to pay.

3. There would have been no controversy if the conversion formula was done in a "proper" way and not discriminate against older employees.

4. IBM and its accountants, decided to use this change of benefits to draw off some of the pension funds and help their troubling bottom line.

5. In the process, they have cheated hundreds of thousands of employees of their earned pension benefits.

6. A class action lawsuit was launched by Cooper to address this problem in 2002.

7. 5 years later, after numerous litigation, and appeals, the Supreme Court of the US decided not to hear this case.

8. A summmary penalty of $320,000,000 was imposed on IBM Corp.

9. The funds will be distributed to all party concerned based on some "formula". With a large portion (29%) of first 250 Million and 25% of above that amount going to the attorneys.

10. Approx. 140,000 employees were affected by this case.

Recent developments

Even though I did not initiated or participated in this lawsuit, I received a settlement on April 27, 2007 as part of this class-action.

I am grateful to Cooper for bringing this case to the forefront.

By my estimates, assuming $320 Million payout, the average amount per employee would be $1622 or $15 per month.

This is much less than what they were owed by IBM assuming the previous pension plan were kept in place.

I think IBM did a great dis-service to its employees and to the company reputation when it proceeded with this pension reform. They would have been much better if they just discontinued the previous pension and converted them fairly to the 401K plan (TDSP). That is my humble opinion.

Detail calculation for subClass 1

I requested a detail explanation of the Base Annuity calculation from the Cooper Settlement Admininstration. I received a one page summary.

Here is the detail of how they compute the final number. They don't explain how the various factors are generated. (perhaps someone can explain them to us...)

Here it is:

Base Annuity = Average Annual Compensation(Your salary average) x Base Annuity multiplier (0.00017034) x Years of Service (20 is maximum cap) x Base Annuity Group factor (1.0 for subClass 1, 0.5 for subClass 2) x Age factor (1.0) x Adjustment Factor (1.001251) /12

In addition, depending on your age, there is a final Age reduction factor in my case (0.5195): I was retired at age 50.

That is how your Annuity is computed.

Important link

This is the IBM Pension site. You can login and find out your personal earnings history and your current pension payments and options.

You will need a SS # and a pin. You can create a pin by calling the main pension number 800-796-9876.

Winners and Losers

At the conclusion of these drawn out legal battles, there are always winners and losers.

  • Winners - IBM Senior Executives - Their compensation is tied to the company's performance. Funds taken from IBM pension help improve the company's bottom line. They took a gamble and decided to proceed with the suit instead of settling. They won because the appeals help them reduce the amount of payout.

    Winners - Attorneys - They received a large portion of the final payout by IBM. There share was 29%.

    Losers - IBM employees/retirees - Their pension was reduced significantly and the class action case only recovered a small portion that was lost.

    Losers - IBM Shareholders - The "good will" of IBM was damaged as a result of this lawsuit.

    Losers - IBM Human Resource - Their work will be much harder going forward given their handling of this case.

    IBM has dropped off the Fortune top 100 Best Companies list in 2007.

  • In times like this, I would wonder what TJ Watson Sr. would do? He was the founder of IBM.

    1. First of all, I don't think he would approve of the pension changes the way it was implemented.

    2. At this juncture, I think he would have issued a public apology to all IBM employees/retirees stating that they (the senior management) miss interpretated the law and thought at the time that the changes to the pension program was legal and proper. However, having gone through the courts and received a ruling against IBM, they now apologizes for the error in judgement.

    3. They will make amends by repaying all benefits due to the retirees down to the last penny. This is not rocket science. IBM and it's accountants has the skills to compute exactly how much each retiree affected by these changes and will repay them in a lump sum payment. If necessary, out of the stock options given to top executives which amounted to millions.

    4. Going forward, they will convert all pension benefits to the employee's TDSP account (401K) by using a fair and equitable formula that will not discriminate due to age.

A poll on what to do with the extra money.

What will I do with this windfall?

See results

Reader Feedback

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • jackclee lm profile image

      Jack Lee 2 years ago from Yorktown NY

      credence, thanks. I did not support the government bailout of the Bush Administration back in 2007. Don't confuse Republicans for Conservative. Bush was not a conservative by my definition.

    • Credence2 profile image

      Credence2 2 years ago from Florida (Space Coast)

      Good article, Jackclee

      A few years ago, during the GW Bush administration, legislation passed congress making it more difficult for private parties to declare bankruptcy while giving corporate entities more options. One of these options was to make it easier for corporations to renege on its obligations to its employee pensions.

      Too often, the conservative ideology involves giving corporations a free ride and not holding them accountable for passing on their 'shortfalls' to the tax payer.

    • profile image

      anonymous 9 years ago

      Our Attornies in Maine are very close to getting money to all of the ex IBM employees over 40 years of age that were unfairly laid off a few years back. The minimum of monies will be at least in the 5 figures amount. Stay tuned for more updates

    • profile image

      anonymous 9 years ago



    • profile image

      anonymous 9 years ago

      Some Of The Best IBM age discrimination information on any site.




      Author's Site


    • profile image

      anonymous 10 years ago

      My father was employed during the "ups" and "downs" of the company. It was a shame to see big blue use and abuse my father, who passed almost 10 years ago. the stories of job security were all smoke and mirrors.

    • profile image

      anonymous 10 years ago

      Click here for story:

      Copied, Re-Edited

    • profile image

      anonymous 10 years ago

      Your summary and views are fair and right on target. TJ would indeed be embarrassed. IBMers were family and company loyalty was a huge company asset. When the Microsofts and Ciscos were starting up, we were lied to: job security, superior health insurance, and lifetime pension. Damn, we blew it!

    • profile image

      anonymous 10 years ago

      Wonderful summary, great commentary, and fantastic perspective... thanks