Does a 'minimum wage' conflict with the principle of private property and 'free enterprise'?
Should a person be paid for their labors according to their effort and the market or by a government mandate?
Well, this is more of an ethical question. Is it right for an employer to pay really low wages to employees that they can not live on? If an employer was able to go off of the work that is output by an employee then you might see even lower wages than those that are minimum wage. Also, what defines "effort" in the work place? That is very subjective. Minimum wage is there to protect peoples rights. Corporations already have a lot of power over their employees so why grant them the ability to assess what constants "effort"? That is a question that should be judged by the people. So no, I would say a minimum wage does not affect free enterprise. First, enterprise is not above the rights of man. Second, corporations already can step their bounds when it comes to those rights so limiting them is necessary. And third, a fully free enterprise only exists in theoretical capitalism so accepting it in today's complex society will break down the system into an unworkable machine.
Fred-What Rights (Constitution) are being protected by a govt mandated wage? As a people, I should be able to judge your 'effort'? Do you promote a socialist agenda?
Again, you follow a trend of not thinking ethically. If people have a right to life then they have the right to earn a wage that allows them to live properly in our society. A business should not be able to mandate what they believe people are worth.
Fred--The Right to life leaves you free to achieve or fail. A right to a guaranteed wage promotes, at best, mediocrity and achievement is by definition of a government.
And what about someone not having a fair chance to actually succeed? You are using fallacy to justify your point. Correlation does not prove causation.
Fred-Define fair. A mandated set of parents. A mandated upbringing. A mandated intelligence. Mandated ambition. A mandated level of achievement for all?
Why must I define fair? Do you believe a corporation should define what is fair? How are parents mandated? Do you believe pushing society to be more intelligent is a bad thing? Do you think achievement for all is bad? Again, more fallacy.
Fred-You asserted "fair", that you cannot or will not provide a definition leaves you no argument.
"You asserted "fair", that you cannot or will not provide a definition leaves you no argument". Again you use fallacy to try and prove a point. Try and think objectively rather than biased and I will continue the conversation.
by Nickny79 9 years ago
Our Founding Fathers codified a profound respect for the common law notion of private property as between the gov't and citizens as well as among citizens themselves.The Due Process Clause and the Takings Clause of the 5th Amendment are two obvious examples of this codification. To...
by cindybarrymore 7 years ago
Building the Islamic community center at Ground Zero on private property is a Constitutional Right.Correct? If not, then why? Please support your arguments with facts NOT emotions. Because we all know that more than just Christians died in the 9/11 attacks, correct? If I'm wrong, please tell me so,...
by Doodlehead 5 years ago
According to Lew Rockwell, Ron Paul has plans to lead the Liberty Caucus Republicanswhen he resigns in December. Lew says Dr. Paul has kept his typical low profileuntil he is out of Congress. What do you think he has planned?
by Reality Check 3 years ago
Is land ownership and private property at the root of all wars?
by Jack Lee 6 months ago
It seems to me, the ACLU is missing in action...They claim to be the defender of freedom and individual rights and work against abuses of power by our government...sounds good until you examine just what they do.They target religious institutions and defend criminals...
by Sooner28 5 years ago
Libertarians either claim we have an "absolute" right to private property (if they are of the anarchist variety), or that we nearly have one (those who believe the government should only fund military, police, and courts to protect private property). Thus, coercive taxes are a...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|