I'd like some help with passing the Quality Assessment Process. Will you please give feedback on my Hub How To Putt From Off The Golf Green.
I already added new photos, included more sub-titles and removed a callout module that was not spammy but … who knows if it could be considered so? After all that I still get emails from HubPages recommending to remove spammy elements from my hub in order to get it featured. The funny thing is that this is perhaps my best hub. It’s innovative because it is about something I discovered, has a useful tip for golf players, has 2 photos I shot just to explain the concept and its content can’t be found anywhere else. It has 2 links, as all my other hubs and an Amazon module that I would gladly remove if I didn’t have seen somewhere that Amazon modules were good to help hubs get featured. I’m beginning to get tired of playing this game with HubPages team.
What can I do to improve? Thanks!
If you ever actually read the Hub rules, which is what HubPages has presumed with their emails, you'd quickly realize that promoting your own eBook is the spammy element.
Your Hub is either overly or purely promotional.
As a matter of fact I read the Hub rules but, because it was in the appropriate context, always considered that reference as one of the two permitted links. I already removed it. Thanks for making clear just with a short sentence what remained obscure after several six-paragraph emails from the HubPages team.
I'm glad that helped you.
Here's the take-away: if you are promoting yourself outright, or making money without giving HubPages a cut, you won't make it past QAP most times.
Sadly, HubPages long ago established very poor site user feedback habits, and they continue to make more work for both users and admin to this very day.
I'm guessing that it is the links to your site, because your site exists only to sell your ebook. You are probably being caught on one or both of:
Reasons why hubs are moderated:
"Appear to be solely designed to procure backlinks"
"Solely promote a products [sic], site, good, or service"
http://hubpages.com/learningcenter/publ … d_22732854
Perhaps you are right but, if you are, the situation is very funny because I had articles on my site about the same subjects and decided to remove the articles and create hubs. But I moved a step forward and created links (five!) on my site pointing to my hubs. In other words, my site is promoting HubPages and my hubs can’t have links to my site?
This means that the hub was not “solely designed to procure backlinks”.
On the other hand, no one can honestly say that the hub “solely promote a products [sic], site, good, or service” because it has 880 words, is highly informative and has a new helpful tip that I discovered and can’t be found anywhere else.
Any new ideas?
If you're hell-bent on using HP for a backlink, you could invent a new persona and create a new account here, then write a review of your book pretending to be a completely unbiased entity. Sometimes in book reviews they let you link to the item, sometimes they don't, no guarantees.
(Just don't tell anyone about your new account because someone might tattle!)
Honestly, I think you'll find the effort is not worth it since HP is a weak promotional tool. Much better to use your own site, Twitter, FB, Pinterest, LinkedIn, etc. to promote your books.
No, I’m not hell-bent on using HP for a backlink and I also don’t use SEO black hat techniques. My site is a hobby, I’m not a writer and I wrote the ebook just for the pleasure of saying something new, discussing new ideas and concepts with my readers and help golfers all around the world. I have been doing pretty well.
880 words is well below the 1500+ that is considered desirable here, together with masses of photos, polls, videos and other fillers.
I'm not condoning those requirements, just stating them.
Well, I guess I got all the help that you, my fellow hubbers, could provide.
I came from Squidoo and got 7 hubs featured. More than one year later one of those hubs became not featured because of insufficient traffic. Sad thing, as I discovered later, because it was not indexed and as a consequence was removed from the serps pages of search engines. Not even if someone googled the hub title was possible to get the hub listed. This is unfair!
Later, a second hub, this one we have been talking about, became not featured on the grounds of quality. I refuse to add worthless text just to make it bigger and I believe the content quality is good unless a golf player can prove the opposite. I won’t also remove the two links because they provide useful information for hub readers and also because my site has links pointing to HP. The conclusion is obvious:
I’m done with HubPages!
All the best, my fellow hubbers!
by hypnodoctor 3 years ago
Hi Hubbers,I'd like some help with passing the Quality Assessment Process. Will you please give feedback on my Hub How To Hypnotize People Without Them Knowing.The hub has not only been up and featured for several years, it has also been selected and edited by a professional HubPages editor. I...
by Gary Anderson 3 years ago
I thought if a hubpage was listed in Google search it was featured. But apparently that is not the truth. I guess I will keep the hubs up and run my own check on them.
by Chang Lee 2 years ago
Hi Hubbers,I'd like some help with passing the Quality Assessment Process. Will you please give feedback on my Hub Gift Inspiration - Themed with Doggie, Cat, Horse or Owl by Alex Clark (must be signed in to view). What can I do to improve? Thanks!Few more questions; 1. Are 5 featured hubs required...
by AnnaMKB 2 years ago
First off, my hubs are transferred from Squidoo, and I am aware of various issues there. I'd already checked and edited hubs after the transition, so this is all post transfer.What I don't understand is why some of my hubs get unfeatured after I've edited them? One even got...
by Daedalu 8 years ago
by Solaras 4 years ago
Your arrival has eclipsed a new feature that we were discussing in earnest when the merger was announced.HubberPro is a new feature. In a nutshell, HP has hired 7 excellent editors to help bring our hubs up to snuff. They will be doing fact checking, editorial corrections, updating images...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|