|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Just when I thought I had this down pat...
I understand the importance of backlinks to a page/post/hub. I've done some backlinking to my hubs, but I'm very sure not enough. In trying to find out the right types of places that other hubbers are backlinking to, I've been using SEO XRay from SeoBook to analyze specific hubbers' hubs. (No, I won't reveal any names or info!)
SEO XRay shows all of the backlinks to my hubs that I've put out there (except the most recent ones). When I went to these other Hubbers' hubs and XRayed them, only two of them had any backlinks show up at all. I assume they backlinked to sites that give NoFollow links? I was under the impression that those links don't really gain you anything.
What am I missing here?
Maybe they are not interested in getting backlinks for their hubs?
Maybe they spend more time writing than getting backlinks?
No. These folks talk quite frequently about the time they spend getting backlinks, and they understand the importance of them if you want to rank and therefore get traffic which will make $$$.
Maybe these folks are talking about getting backlinks to the websites owned by them and not towards their hubs?
At least five of them talk specifically about getting backlinks to their hubs. One of the five has a ton of backlinks that I can see. Another has some. The others? Well, I can't see any.
hmm, then did you try checking backlinks to their hubs through yahoo.com? in the search bar type: link:(url of their hubs, preferably without an http).
Yep. SEO XRay basically does the same thing. The link: command in Google shows no inbound links. The link: command in Yahoo shows internal links but no external links.
I guess my question really boils down to this. I know these folks have built up backlinks, but evidently they are NoFollow. Are NoFollow backlinks worth the time to bother going after?
Yes, they are worth it, but only certain nofollows, not all.
BTW, I don't know why, but yahoo includes nofollow links when I check backlinks to one of my sites.
Well, from my perspective, if you have to get 1,000 NoFollows to equal the value of 50 DoFollows, I'm only heading for the DoFollows!
Hubpages gives backlinks on it's own through your profile, all the related hubs, and tag categories. Not all hubs need them unless you're trying for something really competitive
Volty, those are Internal links. You need both internal and external to rank well.
Point taken, but don't you think external backlinks have their own importance when it comes to search engine rankings?
Backlinks to sites with nofollow links can gain you direct traffic. If they're relevant sites and relevant traffic, and the traffic is significant, this may be worth it on its own merits, whether or not it directly affects ranking.
I'm not a big fan of blitz-type backlinking, except for certain articles in very competitive categories that have been up for months and aren't getting enough traffic/revenue. My instincts say that in the next couple of years, Google will go, "hey, EzineArticles, Xomba, HubPages, and all those article sites are all linking to each other...let's make those backlinks worth less by treating them all as 'internal'" and change the algorithm.
I somewhat agree, FT. That's why I don't blitz backlink. I have several hubs that are years old with good PR, and I only link my to my relevant hubs from them. For my other topics, I'm creating new, relevant, quality blogs. I think sites like Digg are here to stay, though. What Google really wants to know is what pages are popular, and Digg will certainly help to let you know that.
You know Irohner, there is no clear answer to your question. I've written a few hubs on how to get backlinks, most refer to individual websites but can also aply to hubs and individual articles. I can tell you that I no longer backlink my individual hubs. I concentrate on getting good keywords and longtail keywords. I'm finding that other people are building my backlinks for me and it's a good indication that I'm writing what people are searching for.
Placing links to your hubs on Dofollow or Nofollow sites will generate direct traffic, once this traffic gets to your site and they like what they read, they will build the links for you.
Good advice as always, LWR. I go that route with my blogs, but find it much more difficult for hubs. I mean, I have blogs that I've tended for a few years that have hundreds and hundreds of organic backlinks. But I just haven't figured out the secret forumula, I guess, on how to do that from a single article. Sigh...
If you want to know all the links to a page, including nofollow, try using the Yahoo site explorer.
As to the topic of needing links, one of the beauties of Hubpages is that, depending on the topic, you can get dozens on links from internal pages, which is enough to get good traffic for a lot of search terms, but for the really competitive stuff you'll need some external help.
Google's OK with internal links, but you need to have the Page Rank on your site to make them worth anything. Hubpages and Ezines both do a good job of internal linking and that's a big part of their success.
I'd say half of my top 10 traffic hubs pull that traffic with no help from external links. I do, however, try to link my related hubs together to get a little more boost from Hubpages for both the SERPs and internal click throughs. And when the Hub needs a little boost I'll shoot some links at it, but more often than not I just let it go.
by Jason Menayan6 years ago
There is a lot of bad SEO (search engine optimization) advice out there, and the use of automated services that procure backlinks to your Hubs is one particularly egregious example. Using services to get backlinks can...
by Paul Goodman6 years ago
Article for discussion. I know that this recent development has already been mentioned by some hubbers in forums. But I am now wondering if this might be the main reason why we are seeing the current traffic...
by KnowledgeAnywhere7 years ago
I have been on hubpages for two months. I have read multiple articles on SEO and backlinking. Ninety percent of my hubs do not have backlinking. But I choose for a while to say no backlinking. It...
by Kate Swanson7 years ago
IzzyM and I have been chatting about backlinking, and disagreeing on what's the best way to go about it. She's been spending hours backlinking her Hubs on social bookmarking and backlinking sites, because she feels...
by wytegarillaz7 years ago
Has anyone paid for these backlinks at all and had benefits from them ?I keep seeing the advert so thought I would ask.Thanks
by easyspeak8 years ago
I know it fluctuates depending on a billion variables...but for you hubbers here who are making decent money, how many backlinks do you create for each hub. Please specify between social bookmarkting, article...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.