Another Google Algorithm Update on 8th, 9th October?

Jump to Last Post 1-10 of 10 discussions (38 posts)
  1. eugbug profile image97
    eugbugposted 2 months ago

    According to Search Engine Roundtable, it seems there was another update this week. I notice traffic has dropped a further 20% to 30% on at least two of my high traffic articles.
    Has anyone else noticed changes?

    1. Jeremy Gill profile image95
      Jeremy Gillposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Yes, traffic's been even worse for me the past few days. Hopefully, we'll rebound.

    2. OldRoses profile image95
      OldRosesposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      My traffic is down but it's hard to tell if it is due to Google or the season.  In the gardening niche, traffic slows in the fall and winter and picks up in the spring and summer.

      1. TIMETRAVELER2 profile image97
        TIMETRAVELER2posted 2 months agoin reply to this

        Same for my main niche, which is what I have attributed the lower numbers to.  Will know more after this weekend.  Ironically, two older articles of mine took off for a few days!  Go figure!

      2. lobobrandon profile image89
        lobobrandonposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        If you really want to compare you can. Compare against last years stats. See the gain you had in the summer compared to last summer and you should be seeing the same gain in percentages now compared to this time last year. If you aren't that means the traffic was hit. Also with hubs on Dengarden I can confirm that they were hit, not as bad as caloriebee though.  I'm not sure about this last update though, things were already going down so hard to tell if this made things worse.

        1. OldRoses profile image95
          OldRosesposted 2 months agoin reply to this

          Compared to last year, both my traffic and my earnings are up because last year I had fewer hubs in general and fewer hubs on Dengarden specifically.  This is why I'm not sure if my drop in traffic is due to Google or the end of the gardening season.

          1. lobobrandon profile image89
            lobobrandonposted 2 months agoin reply to this

            Makes sense.

            1. Jean Bakula profile image98
              Jean Bakulaposted 2 months agoin reply to this

              My work is all evergreen, and I've fallen so low I'm about 50% lower than I was before this happened. I was feeling so good I was writing new material, only having a few last articles I wanted to move to niches. Now I feel like it's not worth it again.

              I had about 15 articles which had 100 scores and my traffic was better than ever in September. Now I can barely see anything except blue down arrows.

          2. Jeremy Gill profile image95
            Jeremy Gillposted 2 months agoin reply to this

            Unfortunately, I think it's hitting everyone; even hubbers like myself (who don't have gardening articles) are experiencing a sharp decline.

        2. NateB11 profile image92
          NateB11posted 2 months agoin reply to this

          This is a good point to make and good to let people know, because when I made the comparison I actually found out I'm doing better this year - so I'm guessing the drop in traffic is seasonal. Good news is I saw that last year the traffic picked back up soon after this seemingly seasonal drop. I could be wrong, have to wait a week or so to find out.

          1. lobobrandon profile image89
            lobobrandonposted 2 months agoin reply to this

            Below is a screenshot of my analytics from Google search traffic only. September and October may not seem like a lot less, but it is 25 - 35% lower than last year on most days. It doesn't look like a lot less because the summer has like 200 - 300% increases. I can compare very well because I did not really write any new hubs that receive Google traffic. The Hubpages guide (no google traffic) and just a month old new tomato hubs over the last year.

            So with the increase from Jan which you can see, this is a trend that shows the traffic has dropped. The niche sites were hit with the recent Google updates. I see this on SEMRush too, for 10 niche sites that I checked. I didn't check them all, the trend was clear. 


            https://hubstatic.com/14247520_f1024.jpg

    3. TIMETRAVELER2 profile image97
      TIMETRAVELER2posted 2 months agoin reply to this

      I compared last years numbers with this year's as of yesterday and found my views increased by 304,000.  They're a bit low right now, but for me this has been a banner year.

  2. lobobrandon profile image89
    lobobrandonposted 2 months ago

    Yeah, these major updates (major to some websites) are going to be happening more frequently now. Before it was once every 2 years, then it became once a year and now multiple times a year. The algorithm is being updated daily, but these bigger updates are usually less frequent. They mainly target quality, quality parameters, the fair use of Google resources and the end user experience. As long as these factors are taken care of it should be good.

    1. theraggededge profile image98
      theraggededgeposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      What is 'fair use of Google resources', Brandon?

      1. lobobrandon profile image89
        lobobrandonposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        This is mainly for websites that add a lot of new content and content that changes in time. Google allocates a crawl budget for each domain in its database and if you do not have a good website architecture and don't have a sitemap submitted, it is possible that the search bot won't get to the right pages in time. It may re-crawl static pages while missing on your dynamic pages. It's not very relevant here on HP, but I wanted to provide a complete answer.

        1. theraggededge profile image98
          theraggededgeposted 2 months agoin reply to this

          Thanks! It's all so complicated. I don't even use GA... I'm best kept away from such things or my laptop would probably get hurled through the nearest window.

          1. lobobrandon profile image89
            lobobrandonposted 2 months agoin reply to this

            Haha yeah. I get the whole user experience thing, but trying to additionally satisfy the beast is complicated.

          2. Natalie Frank profile image96
            Natalie Frankposted 2 months agoin reply to this

            Ditto.  I was getting crazy checking performance and stats every few hours then even more regularly so I had to pull back.  The info available is great on the one hand but sometimes I think there's just too much for my own good!

  3. Natalie Frank profile image96
    Natalie Frankposted 2 months ago

    Traffic wasn't great at the beginning of the week so I took a couple of days off and it was a little better yesterday but not up to where it should be.

  4. Natalie Frank profile image96
    Natalie Frankposted 2 months ago

    I'm down about 12% today.  What's more concerning to me though are earning which are down far more this month.  For the first time in a year, unless things change radically, it doesn't look like I'll make payout.

  5. Ladymermaid profile image91
    Ladymermaidposted 2 months ago

    It doesn't seem to be affecting my sites but I got hit earlier by some out of country cons spamming and stealing my articles so still trying to recover from their monkey business.

  6. ziyena profile image92
    ziyenaposted 2 months ago

    All of my Owlcation articles seem to have fallen in ranking ... hardly any traffic in comparison to before.  It's hard not to sound pessimistic when these things play out.  Just got to stay focused and to keep on writing  ... I've been hitting those keys hard

    1. Jean Bakula profile image98
      Jean Bakulaposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Mine too, and they are my most popular. But I agree, we keep writing, and the tide turns.

      1. ziyena profile image92
        ziyenaposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        Here Here  smile

  7. PaulGoodman67 profile image96
    PaulGoodman67posted 2 months ago

    The biggest hit that I can see is against hubs with Amazon products. This is nothing new, Google's been doing this for some time, but irritating if you still earn a reasonable amount from this type of hub.

    It also annoys me when we get hit in the run-up to Xmas. this is the busiest time, and potentially most lucrative.

  8. Susana S profile image96
    Susana Sposted 2 months ago

    I don't have many product hubs nowadays but the ones I do have, have gone down in traffic only as much as my others.

    I do wonder about ratios of affiliate links overall though. I noticed some of my product hubs were recently moved to network sites. Maybe if a lot were moved over alongside mine it would tip the balance.

    I try to stick to one product page per a minimum of 10 info pages on my own site.

    1. PaulGoodman67 profile image96
      PaulGoodman67posted 2 months agoin reply to this

      You were one of the people that inspired me to try product hubs, back in my early days as a hubber - I seem to remember you wrote a hub about it. I noticed that you generally moved away from them some time back. There was a terrible time period for product hubs. But later, after I did a lot of edits and re-writes, I made decent money off them again and they were easily my best earners.

      I have a number of product hubs on the niche sites, though they are a minority of my overall output. For the past 18 months, however, their trajectory has only been downwards. I've clipped back the affiliate links to such as extent that if I do any more clipping they will no longer be product hubs.

      I'm not unhappy about moving to info-only/non-product hubs, that appears to be the future, but it takes a lot of writing to make up the lost income, that leaves me feeling like I'm treading water sometimes.

      1. Susana S profile image96
        Susana Sposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        Yes I did write a hub about it. Things were a lot easier back then. Little did we know that Google would pull the rug out from under us! I did move away from writing about products on HP but elsewhere I've experimented a little with affiliate pages.

        The main thing I notice is that Google often prefers pages and sites featuring a variety of different affiliates (rather than a singular affiliate) especially when the keywords promise a comparison e.g. 5  Best *******

        So instead of 5 Amazon products, have 2 X Amazon, 1 X target, 1 X other company, 1 X other company.

        It's good that you've kept going. Which network sites are your hubs on in the main? You've probably got more insight into what's going on here than me as I've not kept track of things.

        I don't think affiliate marketing is dead, it just needs to be done right (read how Google likes it).

        1. PaulGoodman67 profile image96
          PaulGoodman67posted 2 months agoin reply to this

          My hubs are on niche sites like Owlcation, Wanderwisdom, Turbofuture, Dengarden, Toughnickel, and others.

          They're spread across 11 HP accounts/profiles. This profile is my original one from when I joined in 2009.

          Only a small amount of my hubs are affiliates nowadays, I don't really write any new ones. They still bring in about a third of my HP overall earnings. But they used to make up 75%. The change is a combination of the fall of affiliates and the rise of Hubads, particularly over the last couple of years.

          (Amazon lowering their payment rates is a big problem too, but off topic).

          I tend to appreciate official HP advice, as my experience is that Google tends to keep its wording on such matters deliberately vague. Analyzing the competition is useful, but not straightforward given that there are so many factors involved in the Google rankings, some of them to do with technicalities of things like the coding rather than the written content of the page/site that's published.

          I don't have much insight as to what's going on. I'm waiting for the official HP analysis and advice. With the recent burst of roll outs, it could take weeks before things settle.

  9. lobobrandon profile image89
    lobobrandonposted 2 months ago

    If Google were against product articles and affiliates, you would not find affiliate sites on best ...

    But they are all affiliate sites. So don't stop writing product hubs as long as you offer quality and a unique view on things. Not amazon re-writes is what I mean.

    1. PaulGoodman67 profile image96
      PaulGoodman67posted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Historically, Google algo changes have often targeted affiliate hubs on HP and other sites such as Squidoo (RIP). That's why over time HP have brought in stricter rules and updated the advice it gives. That's the context for my comment.

      Generally speaking, I stopped writing product hubs some years ago and don't have any intention to write any new ones. My best affiliate earners have tended to be old hubs that I wrote early on, then tinkered with. They've had down periods, but also some very good spells.

      I'll be interested to hear what changes, if any, that HP make once the dust has settled.

      1. lobobrandon profile image89
        lobobrandonposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        Yes, and Squidoo had nothing but list of top products with names to the product and links nothing more. No new or helpful information. They were essentially spam, the kind of stuff no one wanted to see on the internet.

        1. PaulGoodman67 profile image96
          PaulGoodman67posted 8 weeks agoin reply to this

          HP liked the Squidoo content and migrated it over to their site, for better or worse.

          I'm not defending "spammy" content, by the way. I just think there is way more to the situation than your explanation implies. The definition of "spammy", for instance, is never fully defined and it constantly changes over time. Part of the point of ongoing algorithm changes is that Google has altered its conception of what is "spammy".

          There are also situations where Google cuts traffic for non-quality related issues such as when they cut traffic to HP by 22% because they wanted "how to" articles to have a lower profile in searches.

          I applaud the HP/Mavern attempt to set up an alternative to Google's virtual stranglehold on large-scale advertising (outside of Facebook at least), but I wouldn't be at all surprised if we see reprisals by Google.

          And by the way, Squidoo was a fun site - whatever its faults, it was a relatively small independent company squashed by a big corporation.

          When you search in Google for a product, check out all the advertisements at the top of the search results page. They are not there because they are the most relevant results, they are there as a result of payments to Google for favorable treatment. Google  then "merges" in some of the "sponsored" results so that they look like the general search results and people will click on them. If a rival company did that, I believe that those adverts would be labelled by Google as *spam*.

      2. Glenn Stok profile image99
        Glenn Stokposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        The only articles with affiliate links that Google targeted were the spammy types as Brandon explained. I have a hub with five amazon capsules that works very well and gets a lot of Google traffic in season. When it’s done right, Google has no problem with it.

        1. PaulGoodman67 profile image96
          PaulGoodman67posted 2 months agoin reply to this

          It's easy to write product hubs that Google likes, difficult to write product hubs that Google likes and make a significant amount of money nowadays.

          There are numerous reasons for why it's got harder over time. It's a competitive and complicated area. Brandon's advice (which I never sought) isn't bad or wrong, but it is the same general advice for beginners that's been around for years. It doesn't explain why your product hubs went down 10%, Glen.

          My concern is that we are in mid-October and Amazon income is going down, not up, as we approach Xmas. I'm generally much more focused on non-product hubs at other times of year.

          Anyway, any help or advice from HP staff and editors much appreciated. I know it will likely take time to figure out the effects and implications of the latest changes.

          1. Glenn Stok profile image99
            Glenn Stokposted 8 weeks agoin reply to this

            Paul, I didn’t say that I lost 10% traffic on only my product hubs. I lost 10% across all my hubs. Based on a discussion in another forum, we are all coming to the conclusion that the drop is due to the Q&A causing a lower ranking on niche sites.

            1. lobobrandon profile image89
              lobobrandonposted 8 weeks agoin reply to this

              QnA very likely and also the webpage load speed.

  10. Glenn Stok profile image99
    Glenn Stokposted 2 months ago

    I agree with Brandon. Google is not against product hubs. Almost 1/3 of my monthly residuals if from Amazon sales. My Amazon hubs are doing well and their views only dropped about 10% since a month ago, which is the same drop I noticed among all my hubs.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)