New Spate of Low-Quality Posts

Jump to Last Post 1-17 of 17 discussions (34 posts)
  1. Jodah profile image89
    Jodahposted 2 years ago

    Has anyone else noticed there are a lot of low-quality posts appearing on their feed in the last few days? With some, the entire content of the article is written in the summary. I checked one such article and found it was actually on Discover...shock, shock!
    Others are the usual, one or two-paragraph 'day in my life' type blog posts.
    It seems the dreaded YouTube scammer may be at it again.

    1. Matt Wells profile imageSTAFF
      Matt Wellsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I know the spam is annoying, but we are doing our best. The HubPages community pitching in with flagging helps. Please continue to do so.

      1. Kenna McHugh profile image92
        Kenna McHughposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Matt, How about a finder's fee!?

      2. Jodah profile image89
        Jodahposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Thank you, Matt. I know it must be labour intensive trying to keep on top of it all. I will just keep flagging away.

  2. Brenda Arledge profile image82
    Brenda Arledgeposted 2 years ago

    Yep.  I don't understand it.

    How is it they get to discover?

    1. Jodah profile image89
      Jodahposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      That is the question, Brenda.

      1. Brenda Arledge profile image82
        Brenda Arledgeposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Confusing...i do report the really bad ones.
        Quite frankly I don't want those kind of articles on Hubpages.

  3. PaulGoodman67 profile image97
    PaulGoodman67posted 2 years ago

    I see a lot of spam, typically just adverts making a feeble attempt at pretending they're an article. Everything from management consultancies to escort services.

    They're on Hubpages.com, though, generally, rather than Discover. I still report them whatever site they're on if I see them.

    There's an awful lot of spam on Hubpages.com and Discover. HP must get bombarded with hundreds every week, maybe hundreds every day.

    I think, like you say, Jodah, some people are wrongly informed that they can benefit from publishing low quality crap here.

    I think the site is pretty good at filtering it out nowadays, though. I remember when we were all supposed to go "hub-hopping"...  smile

    1. Jodah profile image89
      Jodahposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, Paul, I remember the hub-hopping well. That often became quite time consuming and I am not sure how effective it was. I thought the site was getting better at filtering out the very low quality stuff, but it seems to have slipped lately. I reported six articles yesterday, four from the same company but for different services and the first paragraph in each was a link to their website.

  4. ravirajan01 profile image95
    ravirajan01posted 2 years ago

    I am also getting a lot of advertisements about various services from beauty treatments to writing services. Not sure why it is happening.

    1. Jodah profile image89
      Jodahposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Same here, Ravi.

  5. Misbah786 profile image80
    Misbah786posted 2 years ago

    I frequently report such articles. There are far too many spammers here... we simply cannot get rid of them... HP should conduct an entry examination before allowing users to post anything... just reporting them is not the solution, in my opinion. smile

    Just yesterday, I discovered four spammers in a WhatsApp-related forum post. The thread was started two months ago, and is still rolling on....HP had already blocked three of the four users who posted on it, but is banning those profiles really helpful?  Those spammers can create a new account the very next second.

    1. Jodah profile image89
      Jodahposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, Misbah, it becomes a bit frustrating to keep reporting and then seeing new posts by the same spammers.

    2. Kenna McHugh profile image92
      Kenna McHughposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I agree. Why should we deal with HP's flack?

  6. FatFreddysCat profile image84
    FatFreddysCatposted 2 years ago

    Yeah, my feed over the past few days has been more crap-intensive than usual.

    I had to laugh at one genius' bio, which proclaimed that he was "a professional artical (sic) writer" who "writes professional articals (sic) for you."

    I will admit to a certain amount of sadistic glee as I flagged his profile. Eff that guy.

    1. eugbug profile image94
      eugbugposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Yeah, it's enough to make you sic (sic).

  7. FatFreddysCat profile image84
    FatFreddysCatposted 2 years ago

    ...and now we've got a live one in the forums, saying HP is "racist" because their article hasn't been published.

    Strange days indeed... most peculiar, mama!

  8. Rupert Taylor profile image96
    Rupert Taylorposted 2 years ago

    That charming lady from Egypt alleging racism has posted an image of the middle finger, no doubt in an attempt to ingratiate herself with people who have offered to help her. It might not work in her favour.

    1. FatFreddysCat profile image84
      FatFreddysCatposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Egypt Lady's thread has been deleted. What a shame. She'll be missed.

      ...no, wait. No she won't. Good ridn'z.

      1. Jodah profile image89
        Jodahposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        That is a shame. She was growing on me.

  9. Rupert Taylor profile image96
    Rupert Taylorposted 2 years ago

    Just this morning I have wasted (?) 40 minutes of my time flagging three spammy pieces and seven "articles" of very low quality. There were others lower down the feed that looked dodgy but I just don't have the time. I do have what sometimes passes for a life.

    A few days ago I flagged a plagiarized article and it's still on the platform.

    Some time ago I asked the editing squirrels if I was wasting my time in flagging rubbish but Matt encouraged me to keep it up.

    1. Kenna McHugh profile image92
      Kenna McHughposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      That's nice of you.

  10. Stephen Tomkinson profile image82
    Stephen Tomkinsonposted 2 years ago

    Surely there's a big difference between spam and an article that doesn't quite meet standards? Undoubtedly, there are some writers out there who are trying their best and using HubPages as a platform. It's important that they have the chance to see what works, and what doesn't, and learn from their experience (and the goodwill of those who are willing to offer constructive criticism.
    It seems to me that a few low-quality posts is a small price to pay.

    1. Kenna McHugh profile image92
      Kenna McHughposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      You know, time is money these days. Writing takes time.

    2. PaulGoodman67 profile image97
      PaulGoodman67posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Stephen - I think that's part of the reason that they have Hubpages.com and Discover, so that writers can learn what works without the low quality stuff p*ssing off Google and screwing things up for everyone.

      The problem is really if it gets into the niches, which doesn't really happen as those articles are checked by editors.

      That said, if it's essentially an advert, or written in truly terrible English then I'll flag it.

    3. Jodah profile image89
      Jodahposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Yes Stephen, if I read any articles from newbies that actually appear to be a genuine attempt at writing, I email them with advice on what needs improving and/or to check the Learning Centre.

  11. Rupert Taylor profile image96
    Rupert Taylorposted 2 years ago

    I agree with your sentiment Stephen, but a lot of the offerings are just plain awful whose authors have no hope of making the grade. I'm not talking about articles that "don't quite meet standards."

    Every day I see long screeds of spun text that is complete gibberish, other postings come from people who have not been near the Learning Center and think that 250 words of bad English on the topic of a politician in their land will score them lots of money. Yet others want to rant about something that upsets them, often this has been the state of play in Kashmir.

    There used to be a lot of forum threads from people whose articles were rejected and came here for help. Sometimes, they weren't dreadful and needed some tweaking and advice. Those rarely appear in my feed now.

    Some of us offered coaching, one Welsh angel in particular, but the same errors kept cropping up over and over again so that I, for one, grew tired of the repetition. In addition, there were folk who took belligerent exception to being told they had written something of less than Pulitzer Prize quality.

    If HubPages is going to continue to be successful it has to publish only quality material; it can't be a training ground for beginners. Google will punish HP if it allows low-quality writing onto its platform.

    1. DrMark1961 profile image98
      DrMark1961posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I am always amazed at how helfpul that Welsh angel is. I would have been banging my head against the wall long before on most of them.

  12. Stephen Tomkinson profile image82
    Stephen Tomkinsonposted 2 years ago

    Agreed Paul. There should be no room for Spam here. It would be good if genuine writers could be offered a little more help as they get started.
    Having said that, I've just read a piece that is appallingly badly written and gets the basic facts wrong.

  13. Stephen Tomkinson profile image82
    Stephen Tomkinsonposted 2 years ago

    Agreed, She seems to have infinite patience.

  14. theraggededge profile image88
    theraggededgeposted 2 years ago

    ::Blushing::

    The occasional lovely article makes up for all the not-so-good ones. And I don't actually look at my feed, not ever. So I only see the posts here.

  15. Stephen Tomkinson profile image82
    Stephen Tomkinsonposted 2 years ago

    Don't blush -  take a bow.

  16. FatFreddysCat profile image84
    FatFreddysCatposted 2 years ago

    If you look at the list of "related discussions" under this thread, you'll find that sub-standard articles have been an ongoing problem for a loooooong time around here. Some things never change.

    https://hubstatic.com/16125991.jpg

  17. PaulGoodman67 profile image97
    PaulGoodman67posted 2 years ago

    Yup. Problems like spam, misinformation, substandard material continue to be an issue not just at HP, but across the internet.

    Computers speed up and increase the volume of info being published and posted. It's usually not economic to filter this with humans, so computers decide what gets through, and then they use algorithms to decide what's promoted and what's relegated.

    The best that websites can do is usually to divert the crap to a safe place. Email software might put it in a spam folder. HP put the crap in hubpages.com, and the questionable stuff goes into the purgatory that is Discover, where it's checked over by (human) editors.

    That's how I understand it.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)