|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisements has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
I am currently writing an article on InfoBarrel.... they flashed a warning before publication which stated that they have a maximum keyword density of 3.5% and that my post would have to go into a queue unless I got it down. It was 4%, I deleted the word a couple of times, and the warning went away.
Surely such a flag or filter would be good to both: a) cut out the spammy crap, and b) potentially beneficial to our own performance? Perhaps even just in the form of a small widget in the editing page, which lists the top 10 keywords by density?
That sounds like a good idea (I have to admit this is the first time I realized keyword density was something I needed to worry about).
Fairly easy to overdo it, huh? Yeah that'd be a good tool. It really is quite easy to work your keywords naturally into your articles if they're on target. I used to notice this at... somewhere where I used to pop them in at. Haven't bothered in some time, because I never thought of the risk of having too many, and it was easy to hit the 2.5 to 3% recommended.
InfoBarrel thinks 4% is too many, apparently, is there any other official word on this from anyone, such as google, does anyone know?
InfoBarrel has a 3.5% cap.
I'm not suggesting a 3.5% cap, unless that is considered the optimum.
In fact, I would probably use the tool more to determine which keywords I can bring UP to 2% or 2.5%. But it would be handy nonetheless, particularly if you intend to write to target a specific phrase, and find that another phrase or is undermining it a little.
Alternativley, if edweirdo wants to write a plugin or add-on I would happily shell out a few dollars for it
How do we know that 3.5 is the right cap? Where does Google say that it will penalize 3.6% Pick the wrong number or don't update it and you'll screw up a lot of SEO and fall behind in the rankings. That rumor number has changed constantly in the last 10 years that I've dealt with it.
by Thomas Byers9 years ago
I thought I would start publishing some search engine tips to help everyone to get some extra hits from the search engines.1. Long TailDo you know what the Long Tail is. Its where you use a 3-5 word title for your Hub...
by Syed Hunbbel Meer6 years ago
How much density of keyword do you prefer in your articles? OR in other words, how many times you use your main keyword in a 500-600 words article? And do you also mix up other permutations of that main keyword? If yes,...
by Ru-an8 years ago
I heard someone say that if possible your hub title should be the exact keyword that you use as your main keyword, if you want to rank high in search engines. But that doesnt allow for a catchy title which will get you...
by Nathan Bernardo4 years ago
I guess it seems simple: Too many keywords, too often, in one article. But what if your title is nothing but keywords, yet they are relevant? Is that too dense? I understand that tricksters try to pack irrelevant...
by JP Carlos6 years ago
What rules should I follow on keyword density for my hub?Is there a rule or guide when it comes to keyword density for a hub?
by kschang7 years ago
With my own hub as an example... I won't show you the hub, but I'll just tell you it's my most popular hub. The hub was started in April of 2010 as sort of a joke, but steadily grew and grew, and grew. In September of...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.